Father Heathen
Veteran Member
"But animal torture is integral to my very identity..."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"But animal torture is integral to my very identity..."
And? So the animal is dead, so what. It's dead, then drain the blood. This is not complicated, and it's being hung up over unnecessary beliefs.
You're dodging the issue.
Your religion requires you to ritualistically slit an animals throat?
Are you prepared to give up Pork and shellfish to make others happy? Thought not. So perhaps just minding your own business ....?
"But animal torture is integral to my very identity..."
So explain, then, just why they can't comply with modern slaughter and exsanguination methods? There is no difference aside from the use of electricity or captive bolts, a method that ensures not only efficient exsanguination but also ensures the safety of those doing the work. For Jews to cry antisemitism over an ancient and unnecessary practice being locked down (and this isn't new, either; it has long been criticized by veterinarians and animal welfare groups) is ridiculous and childish. There is nothing, nothing, lost by them modifying their beliefs and practices as others have throughout the ages.
A stupid attempt at table-turning. Others have given up many things, as outlined in Post #12. Are you (or rather, the government) going to mind your own business over animal sacrifice? What about genital mutilation? Polygamy? Witch hunts? How about when your neighbor starts displaying swastikas?
Thought not.
No one is forcing them to give up meat. If one's superstitious, oops II mean religious, beliefs say that one needs to unnecessarily torture the animals that one eats, then that is their fault.Not dodging at all, but I am aware of the various opinions. If the Jews or the Muslims want their meat slaughtered a certain way, why interfere. Are you prepared to give up Pork and shellfish to make others happy? Thought not. So perhaps just minding your own business ....?
Are you proposing that there should be no regulations on how animals are slaughtered for food so anyone can choose to do it however they personally prefer or are you proposing that we keep the existing laws and regulations but grant special exemptions for Muslims and Jews to break them? If it is the latter, do you extend this principle to any other laws or regulations and any other religious religions or beliefs?Not dodging at all, but I am aware of the various opinions. If the Jews or the Muslims want their meat slaughtered a certain way, why interfere. Are you prepared to give up Pork and shellfish to make others happy? Thought not. So perhaps just minding your own business ....?
What it amounts to is a statement of "stop being Jewish the way you understand to be Jewish, or leave." Now, of course, this could be prompted by a sincere belief that something intrinsic to Jewish practice must be legislated against, or a belief that (a) religious belief must take a back seat to other legal systems. The underlying message, though, is the same -- no one is forcing you to continue to practice as you see fit so either change your practice or you will have to go elsewhere.The United States envoy against anti-Semitism has condemned the spread of legislation in Europe that limits the slaughter of animals according to Jewish religious tradition as “disgraceful” and “intolerable,” claiming such laws are forcing the expulsion of Jewish communities.
Countries banning kosher meat are forcing “expulsion” of Jews, says U.S. anti-Semitism envoy
The United States envoy against anti-Semitism has condemned the spread of legislation in Europe that limits the slaughter of animals according to Jewish religious tradition as “disgraceful” and “intolerable,” claiming such laws are forcing the expulsion of Jewish communities.
Countries banning kosher meat are forcing “expulsion” of Jews, says U.S. anti-Semitism envoy
Are you proposing that there should be no regulations on how animals are slaughtered for food so anyone can choose to do it however they personally prefer or are you proposing that we keep the existing laws and regulations but grant special exemptions for Muslims and Jews to break them? If it is the latter, do you extend this principle to any other laws or regulations and any other religious religions or beliefs?
Pretty sure the last few moments the animal is aware after it's throat is slashed are pretty upsetting for the animal.How do we know which is the most humane way? At least with Halal and Kosher the animal is calm up to the moment its throat is slashed.
Good. I’m glad they’re banning it.The United States envoy against anti-Semitism has condemned the spread of legislation in Europe that limits the slaughter of animals according to Jewish religious tradition as “disgraceful” and “intolerable,” claiming such laws are forcing the expulsion of Jewish communities.
Countries banning kosher meat are forcing “expulsion” of Jews, says U.S. anti-Semitism envoy
Pretty sure the last few moments the animal is aware after it's throat is slashed are pretty upsetting for the animal.
Are they? Animals can often smell blood and fear of their own. I don't think that they are very reassured no matter what method is used. And I do admit to being ignorant in the following,but I am unaware of any demand by their religion that Jews or Muslims have to eat meat. If their meat processing is too cruel for countries that they live in isn't vegetarianism an option for them?How do we know which is the most humane way? At least with Halal and Kosher the animal is calm up to the moment its throat is slashed.