Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Got an argument against it other than appeal to tradition? Or is "Grrrr libruls " basically it?Of course it will, give it a few years. What liberals claim to oppose today will become a celebrated lifestyle choice by tomorrow.
Proud monarchist here *raises hand*Do they still like the Queen down under?
Proud monarchist here *raises hand*
Countries like Australia prove secularism does not equal communism and other violent antitheisms.
This thread is basically about secularism vs theocracy
HICommunism, in principle.... sounds amazing to me. It’s just not possible and is unrealistic given the nature of humans. It also would threaten other systems, which would be a big no-no.
So now, it’s just a buzz trigger word and label that turns on an offensive switch in many due to the indoctrinated preconceptions of it being evil or given a bad image/rep for what others may have done to abuse it.
Nonsense, one could just as easily point to poor theocratic places such as Middle East and North Africa as failed examples of theocracy. Or richer examples of theocracy such as Russia.Hi
I noticed that you started this thread to debunk the comment,,,,, Forget the "end of religious wars" which was the sentiment ushered in at the turn of the 20th Century - where hundreds of millions were murdered for secular causes.
The question that you posed did not mention the hundred million or so who died in the failed secular experiments of the 20th century,
The modern chinese expression of this collective secular approach is not looking so good either.
Surley the chinese at 1,5 Billion occuppying part of a continent is a better example than Australia's you 25 million on an entire continent. Countries like australia are no example of anything other than it is better to be a rich country than a poor one. Our secular good charm would turn pretty parochial and nasty very quickly, us Aussies are like that.
This thread is basically about leftists and liberals trying to forget what their ideology leads to when it gets control.
Peace
Countries like Australia prove secularism does not equal communism and other violent antitheisms.
This thread is basically about secularism vs theocracy
HI
Killing millions upon millions of your own people is an unfortunate glitch in the system though.
Peace.
HINonsense, one could just as easily point to poor theocratic places such as Middle East and North Africa as failed examples of theocracy. Or richer examples of theocracy such as Russia.
Liberals often do have power in Australia (bar the current government) and to no detriment.
Norway and Sweden have non-religious countries (although I don’t know how left-wing they are).
China is a communist country and one need not be communist to be liberal. Japan has low religiousity and it is capitalist.
You slur liberals as communists or other violent anti theists etc, but this is a lie that you tell to keep fellow church goers in the dark about better options that they have.
HiActually killed in the name of nationalism.
I'm a British republican, but I think we're the minority here.
I reckon the French had the right idea!
Hi
How do you figure that?
Peace
HIPolitics. Those killings were not in the name of communism but to stamp out objection to the revolutionary cause, i.e. nationalism.
However if you want to talk about mass killings in the name of a cause, how about religion who's tally beats 800 million in recorded history
HiCountries like Australia prove secularism does not equal communism and other violent antitheisms.
This thread is basically about secularism vs theocracy
Well yeah, we helped our allies in times of war.Hi
The australian governent has whole heartedly supported every stupid military venture in the last 100 years. It is not an example of the secular ethic that you should be proud of.
Peace
HI
That is not a very comprehensive list. Yes they went after counter revolutionaries in the first couple of years but the REAL slaughter was when they went after the middle class and the small farmers and collectivised the means of production.
The mass starvations were not nationalism they were the result of human decisions made in line with the collective ideology of the rabidly secular left.
Marx was just plain wrong. The world can not be viewed as the oppressor and the oppressed. That way leads to the grave.
If you want to get into the religious violence you name the conflict and i'll give you the geo/political reason why it really happened. Anywhere from now back to the Summerians just so i don't miss anything.
Religion has been used to justify war but it has mostly been the junior partner. Secularism is the same beast without any of the restraint.
Peace
Well yeah, we helped our allies in times of war.
Of course it will, give it a few years. What liberals claim to oppose today will become a celebrated lifestyle choice by tomorrow.