-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Creationists, please provide evidence
- Thread starter evolved yet?
- Start date
The_Evelyonian
Old-School Member
Hey Evelyonian, somebody threw up on your avatar..... GO COLTS!!!!!!!!
Yeah, it was a pretty severe beating that the Colts handed us.....oh, wait.
Danmac
Well-Known Member
Yeah, it was a pretty severe beating that the Colts handed us.....oh, wait.
We will meet again you know?
The_Evelyonian
Old-School Member
Unfortunately, yes. And if the Texans play like they did against the Cowboys yesterday, it won't be a pretty sight.....
Danmac
Well-Known Member
We played horrible against Houston, but they are still one heck of a team. I think our defense finally woke up.
The_Evelyonian
Old-School Member
I really think that the Colts came in thinking that they were going to walk away with it. Houston surprised them. I doubt it'll happen that way twice.
If Houston can play the way they did when they beat the Colts and the Redskins, and if the Colts come prepared, it should be one heck of a game.
Danmac
Well-Known Member
I don't think they underestimated them. I think they needed a good beating to wake them up. That it did. The next time we play them it will be worth the price of admission. They are truly contenders at this point.
The_Evelyonian
Old-School Member
You could very well be right. If nothing else, it shook them up. The Colts know now they're not invincible. When they play Houston again, they'll be coming for revenge.
(In case you can't tell, I'm a bit of a Colts fan too
)Agreed.
A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
Football is so much more a worthy topic than creationism.
Danmac
Well-Known Member
Hell hath no fury like a pony scorned.
I take back every bad thing I ever said about ya.(In case you can't tell, I'm a bit of a Colts fan too
lets get ready to rrruuuummmbble
The_Evelyonian
Old-School Member
Hell hath no fury like a pony scorned.
I take back every bad thing I ever said about ya.
lets get ready to rrruuuummmbble
Frubals
Danmac
Well-Known Member
Hats off to the Texans. Frubals back at ya.:woohoo:
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
Could you be a little more vague?
No, they don't. You still have no idea what they teach.
Please please please stick to the subject, it's really irritating saying the same thing over and over. Can we please move on? This thread is NOT NOT NOT about abiogenesis. Please start a thread if you wish to discuss this subject.
You have no clue what the Cambrian explosion is. It has no resemblance to the Genesis account. It's about tiny slugs and shelled creatures, all living in the ocean, first showing up in the fossil record over a period of millions of years, millions of years ago. Does that sound to you anything like God poofing two giraffes into existence?
So why do creationists mention it, ignorance, dishonesty, or both?
Your argument is that the fact that two different species cannot reproduce together is evidence of your magic poofing hypothesis?
Do you disagree with me that idea can neither be supported nor refuted by evidence? If so, why?
Can you cite any such research?
Let's start with the initial magic poof. What sort of research would support that?
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
So the 99.9% of biologists who think the research support the Theory of Evolution are what--deluded? Idiots? Evil? Your view is that you know better than the consensus of mainstream Biology? Just how much Biology have you studied, to be in a position to refute one of the most important and accepted theories in the history of science?
Or is it science itself you reject?
Danmac
Well-Known Member
abiogenesis = God.... Neither can be tested right?
Poofing would have to do with abiogenesis. I thought that wasn't a part of evolution. If you want to talk about poofing (abiogenesis} start a thread.
Start a thread
The_Evelyonian
Old-School Member
Danmac
Well-Known Member
This is a thread about the magic poofing hypothesis a.k.a. creationism
I stand corrected. However, I am a creationist and I do not believe in magic poofing.
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
A mutation has a very specific definition. What it means is, instead of a line of DNA saying, for example, CCTGAG, when it gets copied, the copy accidentally says CCTGCG. This then effects what that part of the DNA directs the developing organism to do. Another example would be that when the CCTGAG is copied, the GA accidentally gets dropped, and now it reads CCTG, which again will affect the developing organism. It's analogous to copying an entire book by hand; you're going to make some errors; it's inevitable. Every mutation is a copying error.
Again, by analogy, think of the word:
TAKE.
If you copy it to read BAKE, you're going to do something different when you follow those instructions.
If you copy it to read TAK, you probably do nothing, and it doesn't matter.
If you copy it to real TAME, you do something different again.
That's more or less how mutations work.
That's how genes actually work. We can actually look at them and see the mutations. You genes have a couple hundred mutations in them.
You can learn more about mutations here.
RedOne77
Active Member
Do you believe that God created everything by "speaking", IOW incantations? If I understand Judeo-Christian doctrine correctly, God made everything (the universe) ex nihilo. Doesn't that make it essentially magic poofing, even if you don't like the term?
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
Could you show your math? Thanks.