But please stop being Christopher Rufo's dupe.
How about addressing my questions and laying off the insults. if you've got a strong argument, you ought to be able to avoid such nonsense.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But please stop being Christopher Rufo's dupe.
White Fragility is influential in the world of legal studies? I didn't expect that.@PureX, @Jayhawker Soule, @Stevicus, @The Hammer, @Orbit,
The article quotes directly from Robin DiAngelo's book: "White Fragility".
As I understand it, this book is extremely influential in the CRT world. So it would seem that you guys all disagree with DiAngelo?
Perhaps you're correct, but she's the one with the influential book...
How about addressing my questions and laying off the insults. if you've got a strong argument, you ought to be able to avoid such nonsense.
No, you asserted your points, which is fine, but ignored my questions. I guess 1 of 2 isn't too badI most definitely addressed your points, but you ignored it, as per usual.
No, you asserted your points, which is fine, but ignored my questions. I guess 1 of 2 isn't too bad
Let me try to steelman you here: You think the quote in the OP is not a central point of CRT, correct?
White Fragility is influential in the world of legal studies? I didn't expect that.
It's apparently about the defensiveness of white people in the author's experiences of giving corporate seminars on diversity. Doesn't sound like the kind of thing that would have an impact among scholars looking at how systemic racism in the US legal system hurts minorities.
I'm not American so maybe I've missed something.
Again, with the scholars. CRT is having a significant impact on politics. This isn't surprising. This is not a topic that will remain in a scholarly ivory tower, so it's time for the scholars to leave their tower and tell us what they really mean - if it's different than what DiAngelo is saying.
It's a scholarly discourse, that the right is trying to weaponize. It deserves to be where it rightfully belongs: scholarly discourse.
Have you tried reading their work?Again, with the scholars. CRT is having a significant impact on politics. This isn't surprising. This is not a topic that will remain in a scholarly ivory tower, so it's time for the scholars to leave their tower and tell us what they really mean - if it's different than what DiAngelo is saying.
CRT is a college level subject. It is not part of any K-12 curriculum.As soon as it's under consideration to be taught in public schools it leaves the scholar's ivory tower. And the public has every right to know EXACTLY what ideas will be in a CRT curriculum in a public school, correct?
You do you think represents best what CRT means?Have you tried reading their work?
google disagreesCRT is a college level subject. It is not part of any K-12 curriculum.
Citation neededgoogle disagrees
Oh good grief, Charlie Brown."Every single white person is racist."
Richard Dawkins claims Kant was an atheist in the God Delusion. My jaw about hit the floor because that statement is bewildering, stupefying and just downright wrong.@PureX, @Jayhawker Soule, @Stevicus, @The Hammer, @Orbit,
The article quotes directly from Robin DiAngelo's book: "White Fragility".
As I understand it, this book is extremely influential in the CRT world. So it would seem that you guys all disagree with DiAngelo?
Perhaps you're correct, but she's the one with the influential book...
Exactly !Oh good grief, Charlie Brown.
That appears to be a strawman argument.Oh good grief, Charlie Brown.
CRT doesn't actually claim that. This has been explained to you and yet again here you are with a thread repeating this fantasy.Exactly !
Yes.So, 37 posts in...
Did any of my critics read the article I linked to in the OP?