Agreed. That said, some claims are more incendiary than others. Should we fight racism? Of course!
But should we make sweeping claims about how everyone is complicit? Probably not, not if we want to win hearts and minds.
We need to make it a little harder for the propagandists to twist our words.
I agree and sort of disagree.
Yes we should absolutely fight racism and I can agree with you that saying everyone is complicit isn’t going to win popularity contests anytime soon.
I can certainly see that turning people off.
But if our complicity (even if it’s unintentional) is part of the system that we’re fighting against then it is the reality that we have to accept as well. Otherwise how can we fight it effectively?
Hmm perhaps have that be more inner knowledge and not broadcast it straight away?
As for making it more difficult for propagandists to twist our words, again strongly agree.
But and this might be my more cynical nature peering through, I’m not sure how. Like I said, you could effectively say that you like seeing little kittens being saved from trees and that statement will be weaponised against you.
Look at the term “woke” or actual legitimate medical terms like “triggered” (a term common in psychology fields and more specifically circles treating actual trauma)
Both are commonly weaponised by the alt right all the time.
I used to run in those circles, not really understanding the implications, back in the day. I watched it happen in real time. It was actually kind of fascinating.
(Course they didn’t call themselves the “alt right” back then. And not being American I was largely unfamiliar with their politics. But still. That was my error. One that I am very repentant of.)
Like you could admire the work of like firefighters or something and it will be used against us!
Unfortunately there are those who are absolutely convinced that monsters of their own creations are real. And there’s not a whole lot the “other side” can do to change their minds.