• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Darwin is tricky

Bishadi

Active Member
So in other words... none of this math proof you keep talking about.
is understood by you.

Because so far I've only seen formulas that support life not violating thermodynamics.
you only see what you wish or what someone else tells you is correct; nothing is of your own mind except your choice of selfish complacency; you choose not to allow common sense to over come beliefs.

If I had solid evidence to the contrary... ie, not rambling suppositions but solid formulas.
Such as the solid evidence that Protons do not wrap around an organella for ATP synthesis. What happen there?

You had been given a method to represent how the 'potential' crosses a medium (the cell organella walls, via Gibbs resonance and yet you have no intent to further the progress.

Each of doubt want me to put something in writing like E=mc2 and give it to someone else to check because in application you really have no idea what it does or how it works.

Just as the scenario on the ATP energy transfer proves.

Meaning to write E=mc2 would have no meaning to either of you...

none of you and especially Tau, have no idea what that means in relation to the sun's 'entropy'..........
 

Bishadi

Active Member
Who is Pauli and what does Pauli see?

I suggest PW has little integrity; he suggests she does...

so in Pauli Exclusion; then a reason would possible exist; sharing maybe PW has something but I can't see it...

I gave him the benefit of the doubt...

you? .... a bonifide creationist.....

and guess who I am?
 

Tau

Well-Known Member
Meaning to write E=mc2 would have no meaning to either of you...none of you and especially Tau, have no idea what that means in relation to the sun's 'entropy'..........

Especially me eh?

LOL

Give it up Bishadi I know what I am talking about, you don't.
 

Tau

Well-Known Member
I suggest PW has little integrity; he suggests she does...

so in Pauli Exclusion; then a reason would possible exist; sharing maybe PW has something but I can't see it...

I gave him the benefit of the doubt...

you? .... a bonifide creationist.....

and guess who I am?

I am not a creationist Bishadi, wrong again.

I find you very amusing btw...and so do my colleagues whom I have shown your posts to, they say 'LOL'.
 

Bishadi

Active Member
Especially me eh?

LOL

Give it up Bishadi I know what I am talking about, you don't.

And in the last five minutes you just realized Photons have mass but yesterday it was impossible and you shared how god said so; of was it some other scientists works and not your comprehension?

Hmmmmm ..... either way, that one item changes a bunch in the math but do you know why?

common on share to us your brilliance with that question
 

Bishadi

Active Member
I am not a creationist Bishadi, wrong again.

I find you very amusing btw...and so do my colleagues whom I have shown your posts to, they say 'LOL'.

again as long as you are with the gang... and your buddies approve... you be okey dokey......

probably why you come to these forums; completely unsure of yourself!
 

Tau

Well-Known Member
And in the last five minutes you just realized Photons have mass but yesterday it was impossible and you shared how god said so; of was it some other scientists works and not your comprehension?

Hmmmmm ..... either way, that one item changes a bunch in the math but do you know why?

common on share to us your brilliance with that question


What?

I have never ever said photons don't have mass, print my quote that contradicts this statement.

LOL you are a pathetic liar.

How dare you?

God said so?

What the f are you talking about?

Now you are p****ng me off Bishadi, I am done with you man, no one misrepresents me, discussion over, I wont be talking to you again.
 
Last edited:

Tau

Well-Known Member
again as long as you are with the gang... and your buddies approve... you be okey dokey......

probably why you come to these forums; completely unsure of yourself!

Hi I am one of Tau's buddies, while we argue with each other on various matters I certainly have no objections to what he has posted in this thread, however the same cannot be said for yourself.
 

Bishadi

Active Member
How dare you?

God said so?

What the f are you talking about?

Now you are p****ng me off Bishadi, I am done with you man, no one misrepresents me, discussion over, I wont be talking to you again.

I am sorry...... it was the wolf.... who said it....

when I can walk on water, they believe me over common sense

Oooops! I sorry
 

Bishadi

Active Member
Hi I am one of Tau's buddies, while we argue with each other on various matters I certainly have no objections to what he has posted in this thread, however the same cannot be said for yourself.

OK ... an opinion .... fair!

but are you a thinking person?

Do you like fun conversations to look at life with both eyes open?

Because so far all Tau has offered is what any 10 year old can find in their text book about 30 years back.
 

Tau

Well-Known Member
OK ... an opinion .... fair!

but are you a thinking person?

Do you like fun conversations to look at life with both eyes open?

Because so far all Tau has offered is what any 10 year old can find in their text book about 30 years back.

Indeed and it's a shame you dont comprehend any of it.
 

Tau

Well-Known Member
I am sorry...... it was the wolf.... who said it....

when I can walk on water, they believe me over common sense

Oooops! I sorry


Dont worry Bishadi any critique from you I take as a compliment, I just don't like being misrepresented, nothing annoys me more.
 

Bishadi

Active Member
Dont worry Bishadi any critique from you I take as a compliment, I just don't like being misrepresented, nothing annoys me more.

but you have not clue what the sciences are you be talking about; you read what news articles share rather than read why it works as it is said too

you are simply a reflector and if you have someone or some article, even real old stuff, that can contradict me, then yu use it, but have no idea how any of it works...

you are simply making yourself feel good with old knowledge

basically not a damn bit of use for the 'greater good'
 

Tau

Well-Known Member
but you have not clue what the sciences are you be talking about; you read what news articles share rather than read why it works as it is said too

you are simply a reflector and if you have someone or some article, even real old stuff, that can contradict me, then yu use it, but have no idea how any of it works...

you are simply making yourself feel good with old knowledge

basically not a damn bit of use for the 'greater good'

Don't talk to me.
 
Top