Bishadi
Active Member
There are few participants on this cite who so naturally combine scholarship and integrity as does painted wolf. The counterposition between the two of you is stunning.
see pauli...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There are few participants on this cite who so naturally combine scholarship and integrity as does painted wolf. The counterposition between the two of you is stunning.
see pauli...
is understood by you.So in other words... none of this math proof you keep talking about.
you only see what you wish or what someone else tells you is correct; nothing is of your own mind except your choice of selfish complacency; you choose not to allow common sense to over come beliefs.Because so far I've only seen formulas that support life not violating thermodynamics.
Such as the solid evidence that Protons do not wrap around an organella for ATP synthesis. What happen there?If I had solid evidence to the contrary... ie, not rambling suppositions but solid formulas.
Who is Pauli and what does Pauli see?
Meaning to write E=mc2 would have no meaning to either of you...none of you and especially Tau, have no idea what that means in relation to the sun's 'entropy'..........
I suggest PW has little integrity; he suggests she does...
so in Pauli Exclusion; then a reason would possible exist; sharing maybe PW has something but I can't see it...
I gave him the benefit of the doubt...
you? .... a bonifide creationist.....
and guess who I am?
Especially me eh?
LOL
Give it up Bishadi I know what I am talking about, you don't.
I am not a creationist Bishadi, wrong again.
I find you very amusing btw...and so do my colleagues whom I have shown your posts to, they say 'LOL'.
And in the last five minutes you just realized Photons have mass but yesterday it was impossible and you shared how god said so; of was it some other scientists works and not your comprehension?
Hmmmmm ..... either way, that one item changes a bunch in the math but do you know why?
common on share to us your brilliance with that question
again as long as you are with the gang... and your buddies approve... you be okey dokey......
probably why you come to these forums; completely unsure of yourself!
How dare you?
God said so?
What the f are you talking about?
Now you are p****ng me off Bishadi, I am done with you man, no one misrepresents me, discussion over, I wont be talking to you again.
Hi I am one of Tau's buddies, while we argue with each other on various matters I certainly have no objections to what he has posted in this thread, however the same cannot be said for yourself.
OK ... an opinion .... fair!
but are you a thinking person?
Do you like fun conversations to look at life with both eyes open?
Because so far all Tau has offered is what any 10 year old can find in their text book about 30 years back.
I am sorry...... it was the wolf.... who said it....
when I can walk on water, they believe me over common sense
Oooops! I sorry
Dont worry Bishadi any critique from you I take as a compliment, I just don't like being misrepresented, nothing annoys me more.
but you have not clue what the sciences are you be talking about; you read what news articles share rather than read why it works as it is said too
you are simply a reflector and if you have someone or some article, even real old stuff, that can contradict me, then yu use it, but have no idea how any of it works...
you are simply making yourself feel good with old knowledge
basically not a damn bit of use for the 'greater good'