Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Oh you are back to Denis Noble. So what? It was interesting. It was not taken seriously so it was probably full of errors. The reason I say that is that parts of his work appears to be in areas outside his area of expertise. It is extremely easy for nonexperts to make areas outside of their own specialty. His specialty is not genetics. When an expert in genetics agrees with him then I will sit up and notice. But seeing a non-specialist claim a scientific revolution is all too common and almost always wrong.Pathetic. The article is not about refutation of the ToE it was about genetics in computational systems biology and was published by the Royal Society.
View attachment 79730
View attachment 79733
I am not claiming to refute his work. I am mere pointing out how badly you failed at supporting your claims.