Darwin's Theory | True?

[Heyo]

Have you ever noticed the 7th day? It never is said to have ended.... and the Apostle Paul said in Hebrews 4 that it was continuing even in his day!

That would explain why we don't see divine intervention today - but not the divine interventions that allegedly happened until ~2000 ago.

 

[shunyadragon]

This was written in Hebrew, right? Do mornings have anything to do with the ending of their days? No.

If it were literal, the text would say “from evening to evening”.

The Hebrew traditional day begins and ends at sunset. In other words from evening to evening.

 

[shunyadragon]

Yes I have, repeatedly!
Why would you say that?

Just blindly reading the Bible does not lead to understanding. In particular what is a day in the Hebrew culture in the time and today.

 

[paarsurrey]

Not really brother. Darwin did not discover "evolution". He developed a mechanism.

Did Darwin create a mechanism to create "Evolution" or to understand that already existed, please?

Regards

 

[ppp]

Did Darwin create a mechanism to create "Evolution" or to understand that already existed, please?

He did not create the mechanism of natural selection. He discovered and defined and described it.

 

[Valjean]

Did Darwin create a mechanism to create "Evolution" or to understand that already existed, please?

Regards

Think about it, Paarsurrey. Evolution had been going on for several billion years before Darwin ever showed up. How do you think all the thousands of different species got here if it there was no evolution before Darwin?
And how do you imagine one man could create a biological mechanism like natural selection, much less set it in motion all over the world?

Come on. You've been here eight years. Surely you understand the mechanism by now. You understand plants and animals have been changing -- evolving -- for hundreds of millions of years. You can't seriously think Darwin 'created' it.

You're asking questions you must know the answers to.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Peace Be Upon You.
So let's suppose that what Darwin said was right, Humanity has evolved from Apes, somehow it was proven scientifically that Apes were the origins of a creature that can think, understand, express his thoughts, have consciousness and choose his path in life, but then, does Darwin's theory only apply on Human beings and Apes?

May I ask what is the origins of Apes? or Maybe even the origins of origins of Apes.. May I ask the main origin of all biological creatures on Earth?
If Darwin's theory is correct then it should lead us to 1 single living organism and from this organism every other creature was developed and originated throughout thousands or even millions of years, but then we say.. what was the origin of this single creature or this single organism? Was it just a coincidence that this organism somehow developed and originated through a very complex chemical reaction and survived specifically on Earth? Have you ever wondered why humanity with all this progress in space has not yet discovered a single planet that has a single creature on it!

Is it really a coincidence that Earth is the only place where biology is present? Is it really a coincidence that the only planet among Trillions of others that has perfect conditions for living organisms is Earth? Why do you think human beings are the only creatures in this universe that know how to think, understand and have conciseness?(till now) Biology just developed?
Then why didn't it develop for Dogs, cats, crocodiles, cows, ants, bees and even Apes! Did humanity prove that an Ape can be transformed into a human?

See.. Einstein's theories were falsified a lot by other scientists when he first published them, but then it was all about the practical experiment that beat all expectations when this experiment proved that his theory was actually correct, and suddenly his theories became a fact. something we are sure of.. something we can take for granted in our future development in all fields of science.
But back to Darwin.. Did he transform an Ape into a Human? Has any scientist transformed any creature on Earth into a human? Is there something called Impossible? Can we actually go back in time?

At this point I hope you all know where this is going, what happened and what is happening to human beings is not a coincidence by any means but to prove the validity of Darwin's theory someone has to conduct a practical experiment that will shut down any other doubters and transform an Ape into a human.. Or maybe anything into a human.. Can this ever happen?

It's all an obvious answer that there is something much bigger and unimaginable behind all of this.

It does not seem that I have missed much in my absence. This is a fairly typical post from a religious believer regarding the theory of evolution.

What jumps out at me right away is your lack of understanding of science, theories, biology, taxonomy, the theory of evolution and how it differs from the origin of life. Over all of this is the false notion that to accept science, one cannot believe in God.

In the classification of organisms that is accepted in the fields of biology, human beings are a species of ape. This classification is based on numerous lines of evidence from fossils, to physiology, morphology, genetics, cytogenetics and so forth.

Scientific theories are logically consistent explanations of observable phenomena that are repeatedly confirmed. Einstein's theories were not falsified. If they had been, we would not be using them.

What you are proposing appears to be a straw man version of science and demanding that your straw man be upheld in order for you to be convinced of the science. It would be better if you did some research and gained some understanding of what is actually being said in science.

 

[firedragon]

Did Darwin create a mechanism to create "Evolution" or to understand that already existed, please?

Regards

Darwin "developed" a mechanism.

 

[paarsurrey]

Darwin "developed" a mechanism.

That one already told in post #206, please.
And I already answered it, please? Right, brother?

Regards

 

[firedragon]

That one already told in post #206, please.
And I already answered it, please? Right, brother?

Regards

I am only correcting you. But if you dont wish to be, that's your prerogative.

Have a good day.

 

[shunyadragon]

Did Darwin create a mechanism to create "Evolution" or to understand that already existed, please?

Regards

Science does not create anything. Science is descriptive of our natural existence. Our natural existence has always existed as it is based on Natural Laws and natural processes.

 

[rational experiences]

Reason. Conscious. Self presence first is a spiritual human before science.

A rational human self explanation.

Reason for our DNA. Body human. Self life presence. Medical science. Human sex reason we exist today. Today you are one day older.

No atmosphere means no natural gas history in space. Evolution first is a gas science discussion. No living presence in evolution spatial reason.

Heavens.
Heavenly body supporting thinking.

DNA. Markers mutation missing sacrificed human life gone already.

Consciousness today. Thinking.
Reading info. Agreed or disagreed with the info. Meaning deserved sacrifice of life or did not deserve sacrifice of life. A human agreement. A human choice.

Quote life DNA. Human. Our history sacrificed our past. Human storytellers say scientist healthy human life body deserved it.

Yet body owned by 2 innocent parents.

Quote.

Original sin. Science says O stone once in a higher massed body energy was Satan. Thinking cosmic history first.

First law in space to allow energy conversion from a colder and higher mass.

Humans argue. I am not living on Satan. I am living on O God stone body.

Energy did not begin as God or stone.

I am correct says God theist

Energy as greater amount of mass never God. Satan body energy greater mass cosmic hell theme.

Thinks as a greedy mind greater mass.

Not natural mass.

Greater mass is cosmos consumed and gone. Lies as a scientist thinking today with God body O our planet.

Just human.

All arguments just human.

Human DNA survived. Quotes teaching,.......... in the past all who died equalled the physical bio human life of a scientist. Just a human. A healthy human.

We were healthy.

Our life theme why human DNA genetics returned to life,.......

A story.

Returned human spiritual self reincarnated life after ice age. Quotes ice which is newly born every end of year keeps life safe with God. Not energy. A stone planet

Correct teacher.

Original sin was with God O planet. Satan fallen bodies burning in hell.

Cosmology. Greater mass themed as Satan history. Was never God O history the stone.

Science theist places Satan body above that of God. Unnatural thinker.

We are human arguing against self subliminal brain AI machine designers psyche. Human scientist.

Born naturally. Sex. Owns his spiritual brothers holy life body. A human a thinker. A natural human life. Just human. Human from his human brother.

Owns a Self possessed subliminal heard voiced father adult scientist. Theism of his brothers human life in the past. Quoting how a brother human murdered his brother human.

By changing God our planet.

Life removed. DNA gone. Memory belief still exists possessing those beliefs.

Theist.

Humans arguing for self survival. Quote scientific advice in the Bible. We are not scientists. Nor scientific theists.

Lots of false scientific detail is in the Bible. Only correct philosophers knew the secreted details. Who taught science meaning alongside of human reason for why their holy healthy spiritual life supported by natural God was harmed.

It is not correct to believe in life harm or spirit harm. It was wrong.

Ask why God sacrificed life of little innocent children,? Their own Father's changed fused earth core. The heart of God. The very reason.

Ask why some are saved. We say lucky. I wanted everyone to be that lucky. Why I argued against science. Satanism. All the isms inferred by a human theist.

 

[Valjean]

Darwin "developed" a mechanism.

He described an already developed mechanism that's been going on for at least 3.5 billion years.

 

[Subduction Zone]

He described an already developed mechanism that's been going on for at least 3.5 billion years.

So he has a time machine too

 

[firedragon]

He described an already developed mechanism that's been going on for at least 3.5 billion years.

But he developed a mechanism. You can call it described if you want.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

But he developed a mechanism. You can call it described if you want.

Darwin did a couple of things including the development of natural selection as a mechanism for evolution. He also proposed common descent and collated a vast amount of evidence in support of the theory of evolution. Of course, you may know this, but I thought it worth posting just the same.

 

[firedragon]

Darwin did a couple of things including the development of natural selection as a mechanism for evolution. He also proposed common descent and collated a vast amount of evidence in support of the theory of evolution. Of course, you may know this, but I thought it worth posting just the same.

True.

 

[paarsurrey]

Darwin did a couple of things including the development of natural selection as a mechanism for evolution. He also proposed common descent and collated a vast amount of evidence in support of the theory of evolution. Of course, you may know this, but I thought it worth posting just the same.

Dan From Smithville wrote," natural selection as a mechanism for evolution."
"Mechanism" is for understanding evolution not creating/effecting it, please. Right, please?

Regards

 

[shunyadragon]

Dan From Smithville wrote," natural selection as a mechanism for evolution."
"Mechanism" is for understanding evolution not creating/effecting it, please. Right, please?

Regards

"Mechanism" is a term for understanding evolution. As I said a number of times before, "Science is descriptive of the nature of our physical existence." "Mechanism" is a descriptive term.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Dan From Smithville wrote," natural selection as a mechanism for evolution."
"Mechanism" is for understanding evolution not creating/effecting it, please. Right, please?

Regards

The mechanism (natural selection) drives evolution. So it effects it very much.