I have some questions about the contents of this article.
The first thing, it says Sunnah is religious duties that are optional. It seems to say that Hadiths are part of the Sunnahs. So the instructions of Hadith then are optional? Have I misunderstood?
i think i could answer that as i'm an arab, the word sunna has two meanings, sometimes we said it's mentioned in the sunna to do ... here the word sunnah means hadith and so it maybe optional or obligation, and sometimes we say it's sunna to do ... that means it's optional to do
so sunna could be said about hadith and about some optional acts
hadith could contain obligations or optional acts,
observe the difference
you got it?
Secondly, it says that the Quran is impossible to understand without the Hadiths. But I thought that Muslims believe the Quran is perfect even alone. Why would it be impossible to understand on its own? Did God instruct Mohammad to have the Hadiths written also because the Quran is impossible to understand? Or is it just lucky that some men decided to write down some of the things that Mohammad said?
there's a sect called quranists who denied hadith compleltly
i'm sunni, so i'll answer that from sunni point of view
first nobody could understand the quran as Allah means, i mean you can't get 100% what Allah means as there are many meanings that we are discovering by time and by science which isn't existing in the past but Allah knows about it and he put it as signs and challenges for the further generations
so nobody can claim that he's fully what allah wills to say of a certain verse
second if you read the quran you will understand it, most of ppl who reverts to islam is via reading quran only but to implement it you need sunna or hadith i mean
for example Allah ordered us to pay charity in the quran this is a general headline but how much i should be? is it annually or monthly? hadith is explaining that
we are ordered to pray in the quran, but what's the form of praying? what i would recite? sunna or hadith answered that
hope it's clear
(I don't have a logical problem with this idea, only that it is the first I have heard about it)
My impression has been that Islam is so important for Muslims because previous religions have been corrupted over time and their scriptures are not trustworthy. But Quran cannot be corrupted and therefore it is the only scripture worth trusting. But since there are Hadiths which show fabrication, as has been mentioned in this thread and others, how do you know to trust any Hadith? How can one Hadith be completely trusted if we know that some are corrupt?
the hadith could be rejected for many reasons, the easiest one if it's contradicted with a verse of the quran, so it's obvious it's not valid one
second way which is the most complicated one is to look to the chain of persons who narrated the hadith from Mohamed till who listener "who collected the hadith in one book like Imam Muslim or Bukhari" so they look at the chain for example i born in 1984 so if i say that "anwar sadat told me ..." then they will see i'm born in 1984 and anwar sadat died on 1981 so it's impossible that i met him, so i'm liar and so all of hadith i narrated is rejected
another example let's suppose there's no internet, or phones as previously so i said Madhuri told me... then they will see i'm Egyptian and you are from Australlia "i think" so does Madhuri visited Egypt" yes when? when Islam was in Mecca so they didn't meet each other so islam is liar an all of any hadith i'll narrate will be rejected
it's not simple as that i'm just giving you examples to get it