One would think.The name on the garbage scow should be enough to tip one off.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One would think.The name on the garbage scow should be enough to tip one off.
Christians too have millions of sites where they denigrate other religions. You do not have much right to complain. A pot should not call a kettle black.Hey!
I was on YA and saw someone posted a link to this BS site. I skimmed through it and the material provided there is extremely filled with hatred against my religion. It's disgusting.
http://www.exposingchristianity.com
Christians too have millions of sites where they denigrate other religions. You do not have much right to complain. A pot should not call a kettle black.
WHAMMY!!!Unless the OP personally created or contributed to such a website, yes he does. Or do you mean to imply that all Christians are bigots?
Hey!
I was on YA and saw someone posted a link to this BS site. I skimmed through it and the material provided there is extremely filled with hatred against my religion. It's disgusting.
http://www.exposingchristianity.com
WHAMMY!!!
Where in the world did you dream that up?? I was commenting on the precise placement of the verbal turning kick to the head that Quintessence gave to Aupman.I guess we've found us a bigot against Christianity here, folks.
Where in the world did you dream that up?? I was commenting on the precise placement of the verbal turning kick to the head that Quintessence gave to Aupman.
No worries. I've over 27,000 posts. If you read a few of them, you'll get a pretty good idea about me.Okay, if you are not a bigot against Christians then I humbly apologize.
No worries. I've over 27,000 posts. If you read a few of them, you'll get a pretty good idea about me.
1) I'm not religious.
2) I generally go to Hutton when I can for a reason: he was raised pagan and is either an atheist or agnostic.
3) Unfortunately, neurotic tendencies and a hatred for translations meant that even though modern languages are barely related to my field, I still not only took the time to learn (read) Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Latin, German, French, Navajo, Hittite, and to a lesser extent other languages, I actually took the time as an undergrad to add ancient Greek & Latin as an additional major. Apart from being an exercise in futility, the point is that I can read the primary sources myself. Also, thanks to access to databases like the TLC, TLL, JSTOR, and various databases of papyri and other electronic versions of primary sources (as well as the printed volumes I own), I actually HAVE the relevant sources in e.g., Greek & Latin among other dead languages to see for myself the nature of religious practices in antiquity.
4) Most of the history hear comes from classicists and classics, not biblical studies, and even biblical studies has been relatively free of doctrinal biases for the past two centuries. After all, the "historical Jesus quest" was basically initiated by Reimarus to under mine Christianity, the responses by the Christian intellectuals of the early 19th century were destroyed by Strauss, and the attempt to restore Christ via the liberal lives (reaching their epitome in the work of Renan) were demolished by Schweitzer. The kind of idiocy concerning dying and resurrecting gods and so forth vomited forth by this site is a sad rehash of late 19th century and early 20th century scholarly and amateurish attempts by those like Frazer which were heavily criticized for their problems at the time and remain only due to the ignorance of those who tell others to study history because they've read a few websites and some popular books (if that).
5) Feel free to provide the historical accounts you seem to think exist that are not "untainted by religious belief" and aren't written by some moron whose historical knowledge and academic proficiency is limited to ripping of other websites, misquoting popular sources, and claiming that communism is a Christian tool developed by "the Jews" as reflected in this anti-Semitic, paranoid-delusional website.
No, I certainly do not imply that. I am only stating what happens on internet. But I do get your point. If steve-vk has not created or contributed to such a web-site, I must and do apologize to him. He has the right to complain (just as I had my complaint).Unless the OP personally created or contributed to such a website, yes he does. Or do you mean to imply that all Christians are bigots?
No, I certainly do not imply that. I am only stating what happens on internet.
Pftahahaha. I'm gonna grab some popcorn, this should be great..........................................................................You really need to learn history that is untainted by religious beliefs.............
Maybe we've got an Internet Virgin on our hands. If so, I'm very, very disappointed I didn't get to pop their cherry. How ever shall I console myself?What is this thread about exactly? That the claims on the website are untrue?
You realize you're on the internet right. The overwhelming majority of it would not be considered credible in any right.
Maybe we've got an Internet Virgin on our hands. If so, I'm very, very disappointed I didn't get to pop their cherry. How ever shall I console myself?
That is amazing.This should help:
That is amazing.