Frankly I don't want either on the ticket. Both parties can nominate better options.Surely we have better than nursing home aged candidates(no offence to anyone).
In 2024 Trump will be 78 and Biden 82.
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Frankly I don't want either on the ticket. Both parties can nominate better options.Surely we have better than nursing home aged candidates(no offence to anyone).
In 2024 Trump will be 78 and Biden 82.
I held my nose and voted for Hilary in 2016, so obviously not improbable.I'm not sure why some voters would like Hilary but not Biden. Perhaps you are correct but I find your suggestion improbable.
Funny, because that's how I view the things you say.None of this characterization is based on facts. It sounds as if you have been duped by disinformation.
Well that seems like a universal thing lolMany people are very apathetic and think voting is a waste of time as it doesn't change anything.
You know I heard a lot of folks (apparently from both sides) lament how Bernie was sabotaged.I preferred Tulsi Gabbard but the awful DNC sabotaged her like they did Bernie Sanders in 2016. They seem happy to ram unpopular or even hated (like Hillary) candidates down the voter's throats and refuse to listen to their base.
There is no political party here that really represents my views. I'm anti-corporate power, against money worship and materialism/consumerism, skeptical of "free market" capitalism but believe in strong borders/immigration controls, tradition, religion and upholding culture. I would fit better in the European populist right. So I just vote for whoever's views or values align mostly with mine, give or take.You know I heard a lot of folks (apparently from both sides) lament how Bernie was sabotaged.
If I may ask, why did you support Bernie?
If you don’t mind me saying so, I figured you to be somewhat conservative. If I’m mistaken, then I do apologise. The politics of some Americans I interact with are sometimes hard for me to get a firm grasp of.
Lost in translation maybe?
Until the minority votes for trump and he's president. That got voters motivated.Many people are very apathetic and think voting is a waste of time as it doesn't change anything.
My point is he was certified to win. Of course he thought he won. The system worked to some extent then, though the Supreme Court seemed to act in a political way, but we'll never know for sure if their considerations were political. Gore conceded the presidency to Bush, though he disagreed with the Supreme Court decision.I'm fairly certain that Bush always believed he won, regardless of any evidence otherwise. It was a while ago, so I can't remember their exact reactions off the top of my head.
Anyway, major elections and campaigns are filled with corruption and lies and have been for years. None of it is real or upfront. It's all just theater at the end of the day.
Gabbard never got adequate voter support to be nominated. She was an oddity that many conservative men were attracted to. I don't remember why they liked her.I preferred Tulsi Gabbard but the awful DNC sabotaged her like they did Bernie Sanders in 2016. They seem happy to ram unpopular or even hated (like Hillary) candidates down the voter's throats and refuse to listen to their base.
Because she had good ideas that crossed political boundaries. Of course she didn't have "adequate voter support" because they didn't even let her speak or be heard. They just dangle corporate puppets, with special interest money backing them, before us. So instead of a young-ish mixed race Hindu combat vet in the Army, we got another old *** decrepit establishment white man to give us more of the same that the neocons and neoliberals always give us.Gabbard never got adequate voter support to be nominated. She was an oddity that many conservative men were attracted to. I don't remember why they liked her.
That was expected LONG before the actual election. Nothing surprising about it all that it actually happened for such a high profile election.I don't make a claim either way but an extra 26+ million votes did come in 2020 compared to 2004 -2016. And that many more votes will make some wonder.
2004- 121 million votes
2008- 129 million votes
2012- 126 million votes
2016- 128 million votes
2020- 155 million votes.
Well the candidates that have more public support tend to get more attention. That's just how democracy works. She was too far right for democrats. Bernie has been too far left.Because she had good ideas that crossed political boundaries. Of course she didn't have "adequate voter support" because they didn't even let her speak or be heard.
Well this is cynical. Moderates or centrists tend to get the nominations on the democrat side. Obama was centrist. Hilary was centrist Biden is centrist. That's the trend.They just dangle corporate puppets, with special interest money backing them, before us. So instead of a young-ish mixed race Hindu combat vet in the Army, we got another old *** decrepit establishment white man to give us more of the same that the neocons and neoliberals always give us.
I don't make a claim either way but an extra 26+ million votes did come in 2020 compared to 2004 -2016. And that many more votes will make some wonder.
2004- 121 million votes
2008- 129 million votes
2012- 126 million votes
2016- 128 million votes
2020- 155 million votes.
Technically, all those people were right-wing, and most of the people you mentioned were warmongers, war criminals, beholden to the billionaire class and love to throw more poor people in prison for petty crimes, while generally shredding the Constitution and grabbing more power for themselves and their cronies. But you go ahead and believe Bush, Biden, Reagan, McCain, Obama, Clinton, etc. are "moderate" or "centrist". I guess Marie Antoinette was, too, when she said "let them eat cake". Lol.Well the candidates that have more public support tend to get more attention. That's just how democracy works. She was too far right for democrats. Bernie has been too far left.
Well this is cynical. Moderates or centrists tend to get the nominations on the democrat side. Obama was centrist. Hilary was centrist Biden is centrist. That's the trend.
Reagan was centrist. Bush was centrist. McCain was centrist. Romney was centrist. Trump is corrupt and a manipulative conman.
I think they’re all corrupt and manipulative. Granted I tend to be cynical towards politicians in general so.Reagan was centrist. Bush was centrist. McCain was centrist. Romney was centrist. Trump is corrupt and a manipulative conman.
I don't know about your country but here in the US you are free to...
Fish as long as you buy a license
-certain fish cost you an extra tag
Hunt as long as you buy a license
-certain game cost you an extra tag
Drive as long as you pay license fees
-and extra fees to license your vehicle
Own land as long as you pay yearly taxes
Own vehicles as long as you pay yearly taxes
Own equipment as long as you pay yearly taxes
Swim in the river as long as you pay a parking fee
Camp at the river as long as you pay a camping fee
Etc, etc, etc.
We are free to do many many things as long as we pay the fees lol
No, it was because the system failed under all the pressure to cheat (by both political parties) and so was over-ridden by the Supreme Court. Bush was not elected president. He was appointed by the court. And in fact, when the votes were finally counted, he had lost the election.Wow did he really?
That was because of your Electoral College system, right?
I'm fairly certain that Bush always believed he won, regardless of any evidence otherwise. It was a while ago, so I can't remember their exact reactions off the top of my head.
Anyway, major elections and campaigns are filled with corruption and lies and have been for years. None of it is real or upfront. It's all just theater at the end of the day.
I don't know about your country but here in the US you are free to...
Fish as long as you buy a license
-certain fish cost you an extra tag
Hunt as long as you buy a license
-certain game cost you an extra tag
Drive as long as you pay license fees
-and extra fees to license your vehicle
Own land as long as you pay yearly taxes
Own vehicles as long as you pay yearly taxes
Own equipment as long as you pay yearly taxes
Swim in the river as long as you pay a parking fee
Camp at the river as long as you pay a camping fee
Etc, etc, etc.
We are free to do many many things as long as we pay the fees lol
So, Bush was made President by your Supreme Court?No, it was because the system failed under all the pressure to cheat (by both political parties) and so was over-ridden by the Supreme Court. Bush was not elected president. He was appointed by the court. And in fact, when the votes were finally counted, he had lost the election.
But the loss of democracy in the U.S. is not being caused by the attempts to restrict voting. It's mostly been caused by the Supreme Court allowing the legalized bribery of politicians via all kinds of campaign contributions and perks from corporations and organizations with self-serving agendas.