• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Destruction of the Homophobia Theory

X_Y

Member
To begin with I am not advocating that homosexuals get exterminated etc.

According to the age old cliche hollywood homophobia theory if you are repulsed by homosexuality then you must secretly have homosexual tendencies. Let's test this garbage theory:

Let's test this theory against other sexual tendencies.

Lets try bestiality which means attraction to animals. If we apply the same hollywood theory of homophobia then :

If you are repulsed by bestiality then you must secretly want to have sex with animals?

Let's apply this theory to necrophilia:

If you are repulsed by necrophilia then you are a necrophobiac and you must secretly want to have sex with dead bodies?

So according to the hollywood theory of homophobia all people have sexual attraction to animals and dead bodies because you are either openly one of them or if you are repulsed by them or against them you are secretly one of them.

I hope you have already seen the logical error here. The truth is that we are evolved to avoid stuff that is counter productive. We avoid/got disgusted with certain things such poisons etc and have a tendency to elongate our lives or procreate. Now in higher animal kingdom there are instances of bisexuality but not homosexuality and most animals didn't evolved as good as we are. So don't come up with some species of hermaphrodite bugs etc.

Yes there are homosexual people but I think their upbringing overrode their genetic tendencies just as in other deviances.

So you can be repulsed by homosexuals, be against homosexuality just as you are against zoophilia, necrophilia or pedohilia and it is actually encoded in our DNA. Actually this hollywood theory is designed to precipitate an environment which encourages homosexuality and thus make people homosexuals. The male needs certain environmental stimulations to make him a male such as a strong male figure etc or else he becomes castrated and becomes a female. Femininity is the absence of masculinity such as in some rare syndromes like androgen insenstivity syndrome where the male fetus doesn't produce adequate response to androgen hormones and the fetus is born as a female. The same is true for environmental stimulations. If a male is brought up in an environment in which femininty is encouraged and masculinity is discouraged as in our modern environment which is created for the purpose of the castration and the weakening of the male then you get a lot of homosexual males.

So if you are repulsed by homosexuality that doesn't mean you are homosexual, it means that your masculine side is fighting back against our current feminist indoctrination.

Hence we destroy the age old cliche feminist hollywood homophobia theory. I believe hollywood is trying to destroy masculinity. The class is dismissed.

P.S: Again I am not advocating that homosexuals get exterminated etc. I am just saying that you aren't a homosexual if you are homophobic.
 

X_Y

Member
How did this become a "Hollywood" theory?

Seems to me you have some sort of "Hollywood"-phobia. :)
I will make another thread about this but hollywood is designed to inject specific ideas and personality traits to people. You may have realized in hollywood movies certain incidents, personality types and ideas are repeated over and over again. This is a way to brainwash people, especially males to make them feminine. You may have heard the saying "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

The hollywood and general western media is a brainwashing machine. They repeat lies over and over again until people take what they say as truths. The homophobia lie is such a lie that is repeated over and over again.

Feminists love this stuff and I am against feminism.
 
Last edited:

X_Y

Member
No. As with so many things, there's a germ
of truth in such specious over-generalizations.
Well according to my OP it was their masculine side fighting against their feminine side. All males, gay or not aspire to become more masculine. The will to power; everyone is trying to become more in their own way. I don't know who these people are or what they did but I find their motives noble as they were fighting against feminism.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Well according to my OP it was their masculine side fighting against their feminine side. All males, gay or not aspire to become a male. The will to power, everyone is trying to become more in their own way. I don't know who these people are or what they did but I find their motives noble as they were fighting against feminism.
That's some of the most vigorous
tap dancing I've seen all year.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
To begin with I am not advocating that homosexuals get exterminated etc.

According to the age old cliche hollywood homophobia theory if you are repulsed by homosexuality then you must secretly have homosexual tendencies. Let's test this garbage theory:

Let's test this theory against other sexual tendencies.

Lets try bestiality which means attraction to animals. If we apply the same hollywood theory of homophobia then :

If you are repulsed by bestiality then you must secretly want to have sex with animals?

Let's apply this theory to necrophilia:

If you are repulsed by necrophilia then you are a necrophobiac and you must secretly want to have sex with dead bodies?

So according to the hollywood theory of homophobia all people have sexual attraction to animals and dead bodies because you are either openly one of them or if you are repulsed by them or against them you are secretly one of them.

I hope you have already seen the logical error here. The truth is that we are evolved to avoid stuff that is counter productive. We avoid/got disgusted with certain things such poisons etc and have a tendency to elongate our lives or procreate. Now in higher animal kingdom there are instances of bisexuality but not homosexuality and most animals didn't evolved as good as we are. So don't come up with some species of hermaphrodite bugs etc.

Yes there are homosexual people but I think their upbringing overrode their genetic tendencies just as in other deviances.

So you can be repulsed by homosexuals, be against homosexuality just as you are against zoophilia, necrophilia or pedohilia and it is actually encoded in our DNA. Actually this hollywood theory is designed to precipitate an environment which encourages homosexuality and thus make people homosexuals. The male needs certain environmental stimulations to make him a male such as a strong male figure etc or else he becomes castrated and becomes a female. Femininity is the absence of masculinity such as in some rare syndromes like androgen insenstivity syndrome where the male fetus doesn't produce adequate response to androgen hormones and the fetus is born as a female. The same is true for environmental stimulations. If a male is brought up in an environment in which femininty is encouraged and masculinity is discouraged as in our modern environment which is created for the purpose of the castration and the weakening of the male then you get a lot of homosexual males.

So if you are repulsed by homosexuality that doesn't mean you are homosexual, it means that your masculine side is fighting back against our current feminist indoctrination.

Hence we destroy the age old cliche feminist hollywood homophobia theory. I believe hollywood is trying to destroy masculinity. The class is dismissed.

P.S: Again I am not advocating that homosexuals get exterminated etc. I am just saying that you aren't a homosexual if you are homophobic.
Homosexuality is not a deviancy.
 

X_Y

Member
Homosexuality is not a deviancy.
I am not being political but it is a deviancy from our genetic tendencies as we males are programmed to become great.

Philosophically I am a Nietzscheian and I think that the purpose of life is to become more masculine and strong:

What is good? - All that heightens the feelings of power, the will to power, power itself in man. What is bad? - All that proceeds from weakness. What is happiness? - The feeling that power increases - that a resistance is overcome.

― Friedrich Nietzsche
 
Last edited:

Altfish

Veteran Member
I am not being political but it is a deviancy from our genetic tendencies as we males are programmed to become to become great.

Philosophically I am a Nietzscheian and I think that the purpose of life is to become more masculine and strong:
You sound a delight ... not.

I assume only the missionary position is non-deviant in your eyes. And your foreplay includes dialogue such as , " Brace yourself Brenda"
 

PureX

Veteran Member
The saying, "Thou dost protest too much" comes to mind, here. And it's a saying that 'stuck' in our culture for a reason. That reason being that there is a bit of substance to it that most people can recognize. Not just regarding homosexuality, but regarding a whole array of human behaviors within which we have seen that those that "hate them" the most are often projecting their own self-loathing onto others. There are, for example, some black people that hate black people (Clarence Thomas comes to mind). Some humans that hate humanity as a whole. (There are a couple of these folks posting on this site.) Some men that hate most other men and some women that hate most other women. And of course there are some homosexuals that hate homosexuals and homosexuality. It happens.

This kind of projected self-loathing is fairly rare, but it does exist. and it can be witnessed frequently enough that most folks have taken note of it. Which is how it became a kind of cultural 'meme'. And how "Hollywood", being the presumed center of modern cultural expression, is now being blamed for the recognition of this 'meme'. Even though there is no actual "it" in this case. Hollywood is just a geographical location, not some powerful cultural entity as you seem to imagine. It's just a place where cultural expression tends to be the focus of much economic production.
 

X_Y

Member
You sound a delight ... not.

I assume only the missionary position is non-deviant in your eyes. And your foreplay includes dialogue such as , " Brace yourself Brenda"
My mission goes beyond missionary my friend :grinning: I serve no woman but myself. I need no woman's validation of my masculinity. My pleasure of being myself is my validation. If you need women's validation to feel like a man then you give all your power to those who have not.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
To begin with I am not advocating that homosexuals get exterminated etc.

According to the age old cliche hollywood homophobia theory if you are repulsed by homosexuality then you must secretly have homosexual tendencies. Let's test this garbage theory:

Let's test this theory against other sexual tendencies.

Lets try bestiality which means attraction to animals. If we apply the same hollywood theory of homophobia then :

If you are repulsed by bestiality then you must secretly want to have sex with animals?

Let's apply this theory to necrophilia:

If you are repulsed by necrophilia then you are a necrophobiac and you must secretly want to have sex with dead bodies?

So according to the hollywood theory of homophobia all people have sexual attraction to animals and dead bodies because you are either openly one of them or if you are repulsed by them or against them you are secretly one of them.

I hope you have already seen the logical error here. The truth is that we are evolved to avoid stuff that is counter productive. We avoid/got disgusted with certain things such poisons etc and have a tendency to elongate our lives or procreate. Now in higher animal kingdom there are instances of bisexuality but not homosexuality and most animals didn't evolved as good as we are. So don't come up with some species of hermaphrodite bugs etc.

Yes there are homosexual people but I think their upbringing overrode their genetic tendencies just as in other deviances.

So you can be repulsed by homosexuals, be against homosexuality just as you are against zoophilia, necrophilia or pedohilia and it is actually encoded in our DNA. Actually this hollywood theory is designed to precipitate an environment which encourages homosexuality and thus make people homosexuals. The male needs certain environmental stimulations to make him a male such as a strong male figure etc or else he becomes castrated and becomes a female. Femininity is the absence of masculinity such as in some rare syndromes like androgen insenstivity syndrome where the male fetus doesn't produce adequate response to androgen hormones and the fetus is born as a female. The same is true for environmental stimulations. If a male is brought up in an environment in which femininty is encouraged and masculinity is discouraged as in our modern environment which is created for the purpose of the castration and the weakening of the male then you get a lot of homosexual males.

So if you are repulsed by homosexuality that doesn't mean you are homosexual, it means that your masculine side is fighting back against our current feminist indoctrination.

Hence we destroy the age old cliche feminist hollywood homophobia theory. I believe hollywood is trying to destroy masculinity. The class is dismissed.

P.S: Again I am not advocating that homosexuals get exterminated etc. I am just saying that you aren't a homosexual if you are homophobic.
This is so wrong on so many levels I don't even know where to start ....
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I am not being political but it is a deviancy from our genetic tendencies as we males are programmed to become great.

Philosophically I am a Nietzscheian and I think that the purpose of life is to become more masculine and strong:
Males are programmed to become great ...

Whaa?
Sounds like a pile of misogynistic, you know what.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
No it isn't. Do you really want to get me banned by calling me names? Only to regurgitate same old feminist stuff? I am opening a dialogue here, maybe one that leads to greatness?
I haven't called you any names.

I don't think I agree with your definition of "greatness."
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
I am not being political but it is a deviancy from our genetic tendencies as we males are programmed to become great.

Philosophically I am a Nietzscheian and I think that the purpose of life is to become more masculine and strong:
Explains the extreme misogyny. My worldview is largely Nietzschean, but the man had notable issues. Including going mad from his syphilis infection.
 
Top