I'm contemplating conversion to a religion. Today was one where I've been through a number of mood changes. I feel angry and deeply bitter at the fact that communism, whilst certianly committed great evils, is attacked on the basis of hypocrisy. For a large part of the middle of the day I was just dump struck that, inspite of everything I'd like to believe, the ethical standards that I've held up to for most of my life have simply broken down under the strain. moral absolutes simply don't work and don't function as a basis for living. the phrase "god is dead" has gone through my mind several times, as there is very few ways to describe the sense of mourning and that something is indeed passing. By this evening, after much heartache, I'm feeling more upbeat, but I also know that I'm still in denial and that another "round" of this is on its way.
this has been going on and on for months now. the same ritualistic process of telling myself being a communist is wrong, getting angry at the hypocrisy of the accusation, then realising how monsterous it would be to think they were right and then feeling more balanced. it is ultimately masochistic and part of the cause for my depression. today was a bit special though; as if a threshold had been crossed and I feel a little more at ease. some part of me let go of the perfect moral standards that I can't live up to and I feel a little freer for it.
the truth is, is that no matter which religion or philosophy I were to chose, I would face the same problem; the problem of evil. no matter how you look at it, we are at the mercy of forces beyond our control. I could tell myself it is god for comfort, but really the comfort has nothing to do with the truth. If I was to be religious because I want to run away from the reality of human cruelty. I want to believe that god won't let it happen; but we can and we do. We all want to be loved and to find forgiveness, and wanting some deity in the sky to do it for you is alot easier than facing the difficult fact I share my humanity with the truly worst members of the species, many of whom were communists.
I came up with a list of options; among them were deism, native american and ancient egyptian religions, the left-hand path. nihilism was on there for its rebellious aspects as well. But would I believe it? probably not. it's a shoppong list of ideas with somewhat positive associations rather than something which would logically follow on from where I am now. I'd have to reject materialism, as it still has some promise of limitless knowledge and therefore limitless progress.
The trouble has been rationalism. As liberalism is derived from christianity, reason is given a supernatural qualitity and is divorced from the physical and the emotional. that is a reciepe for masochism as you attempt to apply moral absolutes to situations where our powers are limited and our ideals relative to our ability to achieve an outcome. I'm still thinking though. I'd much prefer an easier answer to going through this horrible pain and turmoil. if you want to love mankind, that means all of it, including the monsters. Love is not disempowering through, it is not a reciepe for appeasement; it is the knowledge that behind the apparent strength the cruelest members of the human race is a fundamental sense of weakness, an inferiority complex where they are too afriad to trust people, to love others or themselves, and that such people are often- in their own way- victims who turned against the world that made them so. its just so sad because you know that there is no higher power that can save them or heal them. their only hope is to save themselves, but that have to believe it is possible and that they can be free. And we have to believe it is possible they can change.
right now I could do with the belief in an omnibenevolent deity, but really I wonder whether that's because I'm giving up on mankind instead. I just don't believe that we, in the face of all we have done to each other, are born good. That is fatal to communism, but its fatal to pretty much every other worth while religious belief as well. I wish I had the courage to believe it though. it is, as always, the self-professed realism that condemns mankind and congratulates itself on the rationality of its cynicism that is the death of not only ideals but the love of mankind. to think that way isn't ethical as its just a licene for hypocrisy; "any crime committed in the name of an ideal is evil, any crime committed in the name of realism is fine and couldn't have been prevented anyway. its human nature to screw each other over for power and greed and we can't do any better." or that, is how the argument goes. Am I afriad of being wrong, or is it that I'm just afriad of people thinking I'm wrong?
anyway, that's my monologue for today.
this has been going on and on for months now. the same ritualistic process of telling myself being a communist is wrong, getting angry at the hypocrisy of the accusation, then realising how monsterous it would be to think they were right and then feeling more balanced. it is ultimately masochistic and part of the cause for my depression. today was a bit special though; as if a threshold had been crossed and I feel a little more at ease. some part of me let go of the perfect moral standards that I can't live up to and I feel a little freer for it.
the truth is, is that no matter which religion or philosophy I were to chose, I would face the same problem; the problem of evil. no matter how you look at it, we are at the mercy of forces beyond our control. I could tell myself it is god for comfort, but really the comfort has nothing to do with the truth. If I was to be religious because I want to run away from the reality of human cruelty. I want to believe that god won't let it happen; but we can and we do. We all want to be loved and to find forgiveness, and wanting some deity in the sky to do it for you is alot easier than facing the difficult fact I share my humanity with the truly worst members of the species, many of whom were communists.
I came up with a list of options; among them were deism, native american and ancient egyptian religions, the left-hand path. nihilism was on there for its rebellious aspects as well. But would I believe it? probably not. it's a shoppong list of ideas with somewhat positive associations rather than something which would logically follow on from where I am now. I'd have to reject materialism, as it still has some promise of limitless knowledge and therefore limitless progress.
The trouble has been rationalism. As liberalism is derived from christianity, reason is given a supernatural qualitity and is divorced from the physical and the emotional. that is a reciepe for masochism as you attempt to apply moral absolutes to situations where our powers are limited and our ideals relative to our ability to achieve an outcome. I'm still thinking though. I'd much prefer an easier answer to going through this horrible pain and turmoil. if you want to love mankind, that means all of it, including the monsters. Love is not disempowering through, it is not a reciepe for appeasement; it is the knowledge that behind the apparent strength the cruelest members of the human race is a fundamental sense of weakness, an inferiority complex where they are too afriad to trust people, to love others or themselves, and that such people are often- in their own way- victims who turned against the world that made them so. its just so sad because you know that there is no higher power that can save them or heal them. their only hope is to save themselves, but that have to believe it is possible and that they can be free. And we have to believe it is possible they can change.
right now I could do with the belief in an omnibenevolent deity, but really I wonder whether that's because I'm giving up on mankind instead. I just don't believe that we, in the face of all we have done to each other, are born good. That is fatal to communism, but its fatal to pretty much every other worth while religious belief as well. I wish I had the courage to believe it though. it is, as always, the self-professed realism that condemns mankind and congratulates itself on the rationality of its cynicism that is the death of not only ideals but the love of mankind. to think that way isn't ethical as its just a licene for hypocrisy; "any crime committed in the name of an ideal is evil, any crime committed in the name of realism is fine and couldn't have been prevented anyway. its human nature to screw each other over for power and greed and we can't do any better." or that, is how the argument goes. Am I afriad of being wrong, or is it that I'm just afriad of people thinking I'm wrong?
anyway, that's my monologue for today.