Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Good question!:yes: Although i have a problem with accepting the fact that God allowed his only son to go through such torment in order for us to be saved. If one of God's principles is to "forgive and forget" then why wouldn't he just forgive us if we repented? Why does death have to be a resolution to be forgived?Sunstone said:Did Jesus's sacrifice cleanse everyone of sin, or only cleanse the sins of those who believe in him?
Why?
tlcmel said:Good question!:yes: Although i have a problem with accepting the fact that God allowed his only son to go through such torment in order for us to be saved. If one of God's principles is to "forgive and forget" then why wouldn't he just forgive us if we repented? Why does death have to be a resolution to be forgived?
He died to redeem those who believe in Him and repent. Some folks just don't get around to doing that in this life, though.Sunstone said:Did Jesus's sacrifice cleanse everyone of sin, or only cleanse the sins of those who believe in him?
Hmmm. That's an interesting way of putting it. Even though I believe that Jesus Christ is my Savior, I certainly wouldn't describe His sacrifice in the same terms you did.dbakerman76 said:I hate the idea of God requiring someone's blood to appease him.
It sure doesn't. At least not when explained like that.If we accept the premise that Jesus died for our sins, it doesn't make sense if he just died for those who believed in him. Because in the course of a lifetime someone goes from disbelief to belief and vice a versa. In other words, today he didn't die for my sins but tomorrow he probably will. How can we subject the atonement to the whims of each and every individual? It just doesn't make sense.
Sunstone said:Did Jesus's sacrifice cleanse everyone of sin, or only cleanse the sins of those who believe in him?
Why?
I don't think either.Sunstone said:Did Jesus's sacrifice cleanse everyone of sin, or only cleanse the sins of those who believe in him?
Why?
I'm confused. You're not really answering the question in the OP, which is whose sins are cleansed by Jesus' death. You say that Jesus died for everyone yet go on to say "everyone can come to Jesus for life," implying that those who don't go to Jesus - in other words, don't believe in him - don't have everlasting life. In which case Jesus' death cleanses only the sins of those who believe in him. Is that what you're trying to say?Sonic247 said:If you want to go with what the Bible says then he died for everyone, but if not you can make up your own opinion, but if the Bible wasn't true there would be no way to really know why he died. So I'm not sure this would be something that can even be argued about, unless someone says that the Bible doesn't say he died for everyone, but that would be hard to do. Everyone can come to Jesus for life, but some people won't. Eternal life is still offered to everyone though, but many people would rather have excessive amounts of earthly pleasure (which actually ends up causing pain even in this life.)
Sunstone said:Did Jesus's sacrifice cleanse everyone of sin, or only cleanse the sins of those who believe in him?
Sunstone said:Why?
beckysoup61 said:For everyone's sins.
uumckk16 said:I'm confused. You're not really answering the question in the OP, which is whose sins are cleansed by Jesus' death. You say that Jesus died for everyone yet go on to say "everyone can come to Jesus for life," implying that those who don't go to Jesus - in other words, don't believe in him - don't have everlasting life. In which case Jesus' death cleanses only the sins of those who believe in him. Is that what you're trying to say?