I don't know if anyone has provided conclusive evidence here or not. From my studies, for me the evidence is overwhelming when I examine the scripture. But for others, I don't know if they just refuse to believe or are even honestly studying the Bible to see what it says about Jesus in both the Old and New Testaments or what. I am amazed that people don't see it if they have honestly and openly made an attempt to seek the truth. I guess that's just me. I know many people laugh at and mock the Bible and people who believe it. Many believe they know so much more than others. I guess that's why God in his great wisdom chose the foolishness of preaching to confound the 'wise'. To each his own, I suppose.
The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool. Psalm 110:1
i think that is a judgment call on those who do not see it as you do.
why do you think they are not being honest? if they are not being honest, are they lying?
i consider the historicity of the bible in it's context.
there was another thread that asked the question, why did jesus come at a particular time in history? which i think is a valid and excellent question.
judaism changed when the temple was destroyed.. matthew you find jesus being very hard on the pharisees....because they were the ones who were rejecting the jesus movement after the destruction of the temple...
and there were many other messiahs around the same period.
jesus couldn't say he was god because he would have been killed for saying it...and ultimately he was because of what he represented. it's no secret that a revolt was looming around the time the gospels were written.
history doesn't lie.