FerventGodSeeker
Believer
Not sure what you mean by this...I'll do the illogical Trinitarian thing, give you the benefit of the doubt, and let it go.A flounce?
Regards.
Scott
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not sure what you mean by this...I'll do the illogical Trinitarian thing, give you the benefit of the doubt, and let it go.A flounce?
Regards.
Scott
I'm afraid we are in disgreement. I believe Jesus has always been God.
Who is "they"? In John 5, that is the author John's own commentary on Jesus' statement; notice that it is not the same as John 10 where the Jews give commentary on it. If John believed it why don't you?
"For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son also gives life to whom He wishes." verse 21. In verse 19 we see that the Son is subservient to the Father on earth, as Trinitarians believe. Then we see in verse 20 that Jesus will soon be shown ALL things that the Father does...meaning He's omniscient, just like the Father...more equality.
Then, as I just showed in verse 21, we see that both Father and Son have equal power to give life....more equality.
So, we continue to see that you pluck verses out of context to support your views, and the Trinitarian view takes the full scope of the Biblical data into account.
Sure, He was in human form having taken the form of a servant and given up His authority...
but then He clears it up further by showing that He will one day regain His full stature by being showed all things by the Father, and that He and the Father have equal power to give life.
So you deny the very existence of posts #285 and #319 in this thread? I really did, whether you agree with my beliefs or not, and you really didn't respond to any but 2 of them.
Jesus was given back His power when He was resurrected because He had given up His power to come down to Earth and take on a human nature.Matthew 28:18
And Jesus came, and spoke to them, saying, All power is given to me in heaven and upon earth.
Well if he existed in heaven as "God"...how can he be given power?
Sure, but it is your interpretation that this statement means He is not God.This is what I mean by simple and plain of what Jesus said. He said it not me. It's not my interpertation that he was given power...he said it.
God the Father, of course...Trinitarians believe this.It's not me that said he was seperate from God
not so...in John 5 John is not quoting the Jews as in John 10...he is commenting on the verse himself...so again, if John believed it, why don't you?Each were of their (THE JEWS) misunderstanding as to who Jesus was
Sure it is, I don't deny that. What's curious, however, is that when it comes to your beliefs you claim you don't interpret, even when earlier you said that we interpret everything we read, and that even a literal reading is still an interpretation.That's certainly your interpertain.
No, not "some" things...ALL things. If the Father is omniscient, and Jesus knows all things the Father knows, then that makes Jesus...?Just because God showed him (taught him) some things they would marvel at does not make Jesus omniscient.
No, it means He wasn't omniscient in His subservient human form while on Earth. All power was given back to Him when He rose from the dead.In Matthew 28:18 God had to grant Jesus power (ALL POWER) while in heaven. If God had to grant Jesus power then that means he wasn't omniscient from the beginning.
Clearly it is...as you pointed out, Jesus said it, not me. He said that He is shown ALL things that the Father does, and said that He and His Father work equally, and said that He and His Father have equal power to give life, and said that He and His Father deserve equal honor.More interpertaion..."both"????? are equal??. That's not how Jesus saw it.
Asked and answered.He says Matt. 28:18 power has been granted thus meaning he was not equal to begin with.
Of course it is...earlier you admitted that any and every reading of a given text is an interpretation....which means yours are as well. It's not inherently a bad thing, nor did I ever claim it was. My question was, are you an INFALLIBLE interpreter or Scripture? Are your interpretations ever wrong?Hardly. You have already admitted that yours is an interpertaion
YesYour interpertaion is that Jesus is fully God
Correct.but subservient to God
Yes.with having the same power as God
Not from the beginning; Jesus, as God, always had all power before the Incarnation. The Father gave Jesus back the power He already had before willingly humbling Himself.due to God granting God all power
You seem to mock it yet you did not answer the question I asked you along this vein. If the Father is omniscient and He shows Jesus all things, that would of necessity make Jesus omniscient...and if only God is omniscient, that makes Jesus...?thus making God omiscient just like God
Sorry, but Matthew 28:18 says his Authority (Power) granted while he was in heaven AND on earth. That is exactly what it says in Matthew 9:6.....(power was given)
No, I have shown that He willingly humbled Himself. He had all power before coming to Earth as God; and yet even on Earth He clearly shows us His equality with the Father. He even says while on Earth that all things that the Father has are His. If He knows all things the Father knows, and has all things that the things the Father has, and can do all the things that the Father does, and the Father is God, then what does that make Jesus?So you have shown that he is able to do what God lets him do. This is what I've been saying all along but none of this proves him being deity just divine.
I would really be interested to hear your interpretations, but I agree that this thread has lost its luster. If you'd like to offer them in PM that would be fine. This will be my last response to you or Pop in this thread.Oh, I read them...I just don't agree with your interpertation of them. Is it sufficient to say that or should I give you my reasons why I don't agree....not that it would really matter to you.....
It will just keep us going in circles.......
Jesus was given back His power when He was resurrected because He had given up His power to come down to Earth and take on a human nature.
not so...in John 5 John is not quoting the Jews as in John 10...he is commenting on the verse himself...so again, if John believed it, why don't you?
Sure it is, I don't deny that. What's curious, however, is that when it comes to your beliefs you claim you don't interpret, even when earlier you said that we interpret everything we read, and that even a literal reading is still an interpretation.
No, not "some" things...ALL things. If the Father is omniscient, and Jesus knows all things the Father knows, then that makes Jesus...?
Of course it is...earlier you admitted that any and every reading of a given text is an interpretation....which means yours are as well. It's not inherently a bad thing, nor did I ever claim it was. My question was, are you an INFALLIBLE interpreter or Scripture? Are your interpretations ever wrong?
"Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross." Philippians 2:5-8
This passage describes the Trinitarian position perfectly. Jesus is the very form of God and did not consider it robbery to be equal with God...how is that possible if He isn't God?
He humbled Himself and came in the likeness and appearance of a man, becoming willingly obedient to the Father. However, as we learn from St. Paul, this does not diminish His deity.
Not from the beginning; Jesus, as God, always had all power before the Incarnation. The Father gave Jesus back the power He already had before willingly humbling Himself.
You seem to mock it yet you did not answer the question I asked you along this vein. If the Father is omniscient and He shows Jesus all things, that would of necessity make Jesus omniscient...and if only God is omniscient, that makes Jesus...?
No, I have shown that He willingly humbled Himself. He had all power before coming to Earth as God
and yet even on Earth He clearly shows us His equality with the Father.
He even says while on Earth that all things that the Father has are His.
If He knows all things the Father knows, and has all things that the things the Father has, and can do all the things that the Father does, and the Father is God, then what does that make Jesus?
I would really be interested to hear your interpretations, but I agree that this thread has lost its luster. If you'd like to offer them in PM that would be fine. This will be my last response to you or Pop in this thread.
No interpertations are needed to see that he isn't God...He is divine though. I'm not sure why you're curious. Perhaps Muffled can fill you in...It would appear that God speaks through him...
Divinity means a god.
As you ought to know from the Qu'ran Jesus could not say that he is a God. However He is the God in the flesh which retains God's oneness whereas a separate divinity does not.
You are right that you don't need interpretation because you have decided your own thinking supercedes the word of God.
Jesus said you should not judge by appearances.
It is possible to discern that God speaks through me by the spirit of God which is available to Muslims by realizing the faith of Abraham.
John 12:44 - When a man believes in me, he does not believe in me only, but in the one who sent me. When he look at me, He SEES the one that sent me.
Jesus is essentially saying that God and him are One. If Jesus was not, in fact God, then he would be the exact opposite of divine b/c he is comparing his perfectness to God.
John 13:12-13 "Do you not understand what I have done for you?" he asked them. You call me 'TEACHER' and 'LORD,' and rightly so, for that IS WHAT I AM.
You asked the question and don't like the answer given. Your problem...not mine. If you want people to agree with your assumptions then post them in a forum where you will get what you want. if you post them to be debated on then expect what you are now getting. Jesus told us who sent him. He told use where he came from. He told us what he was here to do. Jesus informed God he had completed the task that was given to him to be completed. Jesus told us he was going back from where he came. None of that is interpertation and ALL of it is from the scriptures. Check for yourself. If these things I said about Jesus are not there then I'll take it all back. I know it's there because he says it so plainly. If you want to look beyond that and worship Jesus as God then continue to do what you do. It is not my place to
It is possible that God guides my fingertips to debunk the assumptions you assert. That is certainly a possibility?
I know you have wanted to debate this point for a long time.
There is nothing in these statements that diminish the proof of Jesus being God.
God can send God
command God
pray to God
talk to God
Since He can do all these things he is no less God for doing them.
I have had many Christians tell me that it is not so: however from my experience it is and there is a story about it in the Bible as well.
He could do a better job with you though because I hardly feel a ripple of controversy from you.
Maybe you are just palying the straight man and i get to tell the jokes, lol.
Well you know what I'm about to request? Can you find me a quote That says God talks to God?
Do share. I'd like to see where this is going. Please show me that story
Well, YOU asked the question and I gave you the answers. They weren't the answers you wanted to hear. If you simply wanted people to agree with you then you should have posted in an area where you would get what you wanted. I didn't post to be controversal. I posted as the scripture show... Jesus is not God.
I'm not sure what you mean. Can you elaborate?
"If Jesus was not God in the flesh, wouldn't it seem very logical that He address God as "Our Father." Also, note that Jesus never denies being God whenever he is addressed as God, Teacher, or Lord."
Teacher and Lord are not synonymous with "God".
The places you cite where people address Him as "God" don't really say that.
Please understand, to see jesus or Moses or Muhammad or Baha`u'llah with one's own eyes was as close to seing God as is possible for man in the flesh. Out of the Flesh as well, in my opinion. They are perfect mirrors which reflect the Glory of God that we could never see otherwise.
Even saying that, it does not make Jesus "God" The Ocean cannot be contained in a teacup, and neither can God be contained in human flesh. It can be reflected forth and the Great Prophets are perfect mirrors to do that. You and I and the rest of humanity are not 'perfect mirrors'.
Regards,
Scott
I understand what you are saying Scott; however, you are limiting the powers of God. Additionally, when Jesus says "I and the Father are one," he is literally stating they are the same.
Comparing Jesus with the other religious figures is wrong though because the other religious leaders did not show literal miracles and did not claim to be literally perfect.
You say this so often I almost think you believe it. If you didn't have anything worthwhile to say I probably wouldn't bother listening to you but you do have a propensity that I find common among Muslims, repeating yourself as though that somehow helps your argument.
I would like to get you to think a little more deeply than that.
This is your interpertation of me. I'm not a muslim. Sometimes things need to be repeated to those who aren't listening.
You're assuming I'm not. You see it the way you want to see it. Just because I don't go along with it doesn't mean that deep thougt has not been used to get my point across. The scripture show that Jesus is not God. He shares a oneness but they are not one in the same.