"God and I are one." Who is the "I"? Are you referring the "I" as us human?God and I are one. Jesus said, 'the Father and I are one.
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"God and I are one." Who is the "I"? Are you referring the "I" as us human?God and I are one. Jesus said, 'the Father and I are one.
It is not important whether Jesus spoke or not, but if they make any sense for our spiritual life or spiritual journey.
This 'I' is not our human 'I'. This is not our body, our soul or our spirit. It is the ground that supports these three. This 'I' is the ground of our human consciousness. When we discover that the ground of our human consciousness is God we also discover that the ground of the universe is same God. Instead of saying God and I are one it is wise to say that my infinite self or true self or real self is God."God and I are one." Who is the "I"? Are you referring the "I" as us human?
Hi BornAgain, I just wanted to give you another point of view for the sake of variety .Are you saying that human being is dichotomous, or body and spirit?
Are human spirits before Abraham or Adam were?
So, you are saying that all human physical bodies were the sons of Adam, and all human spirits were the sons of God.
This 'I' is not our human 'I'. This is not our body, our soul or our spirit.
It is the ground that supports these three.
This 'I' is the ground of our human consciousness.
When we discover that the ground of our human consciousness is God we also discover that the ground of the universe is same God.
Instead of saying God and I are one it is wise to say that my infinite self or true self or real self is God.
Are you saying that you are god?Are you saying that you are god?
How do you separate the "I" from the human self to be able to discover human consciousness when the Human consciousness is the body, soul, and spirit?
Human consciousness, and all creations, and the universe according to you are fibrously connected because they have the same ground.
Are you saying that all creations are part of the universe with one foundation? And if so, then it cannot be separated. When one say “I”, one meant the human self, or human consciousness since all creations belongs to the same universe that have the same foundation or ground.
Are you saying that all creations are part of the universe with one foundation? And if so, then it cannot be separated. When one say “I”, one meant the human self, or human consciousness since all creations belongs to the same universe that have the same foundation or ground.
When you, John Martin, say "I", you meant you are god, or deus alter in terra - another god on earth.
Read 2nd Thessalonians 2:4
Human beings are not dichotomous but trichotomous( I hope it is correct). Body,soul and spirit. Our physical bodies belong to the evolutionary process of time and space. Our spirit is the image and likeness of God. Our soul is the reflection of the spirit in the body-mind complex.It is the combination of the spirit and body. When our soul identifies with the body then it feels that it is material. If it identifies with the spirit then it feels that is spiritual. The soul is the battle field between material and spiritual.
Our spirit is beyond time and space.
Our spirit is the image and likeness of God.
Instead of saying God and I are one it is wise to say that my infinite self or true self or real self is God.
Are you saying that you are god?
There is only one God, one infinite reality.
My 'I' identified with the my body is not God, not infinite.
My 'I' identified with my soul is not God, not infinite.
My 'I' identified with my spirit( image and likeness of God, is not God, not infinite.
My 'I' beyond these three is God, infinite.
Infinite is divine. Human spirit is beyond time and space. If human spirit is beyond time and space, then it must be infinite and divine, but you wrote that human spirit is not infinite, therefore it is not divine. If human spirit is not infinite nor divine then your statement,My 'I' identified with my spirit( image and likeness of God, is not God, not infinite.
Is not absolute.Instead of saying God and I are one it is wise to say that my infinite self or true self or real self is God.
Human consciousness is not just body, soul and spirit. It can go beyond these three and enter into the divine consciousness. Human consciousness is not static but it oscillates between the body and divine.
When our soul identifies with the body then it feels that it is material.
There is no dualism. God is One. There is no divide between spirit and matter, because all matter comes from God.Originally Posted by John Martin
The soul is the battle field between material and spiritual.
One sees flaws because the bible is a human construct -- not a Divine construct. It was written by many authors from many perspectives about God. You may as well see and treat it for what it is, rather than what you'd like it to be.That is the reason why one cannot mix the bible with other religion, or gods, or writing, or philosophies. The bible is the absolute written word of the almighty God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Everytime one mix other writings with the bible one will see flaws.
Your religion is not absolute. Your statements differs from your other statements.
For example you stated that;
You wrote,
If God is divine and our spirit is like the image of God, then our spirit must be divine also. Divine is infinite.
You wrote,
If I can translate the “my infinte self or true self or real self” to, or as a human spirit, then the “my infinte self or true self or real self” is divine. Therefore, when you say the “I” you meant the “I” as the divine, or the “I” as your spirit in relationship with God.
God is Spirit; divine and infinite, and human is spirit; divine and infinite.
Joh4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
How can you go beyond human consciousness if part of this consciousness is your spirit which is divine. Divine is infinite.
You wrote,
Infinite is divine. Human spirit is beyond time and space. If human spirit is beyond time and space, then it must be infinite and divine, but you wrote that human spirit is “not infinite“, therefore it is not divine. If human spirit is not infinite nor divine then your statement,
Is not absolute.
How can the body oscillates between the divine? No one can worship the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob through the body. Body or physical cannot worship the divine. Spirit to spirit only.
Joh4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
You wrote,
How can a material thing oscillates or move back and forth from the divine/subjectively to the body/objectively? According to you the soul is the center of a human being. The soul through body relates to the physical environment, while the soul to the spirit relates to the spiritual environment which is the divine. If it is the spirit -part of human consciousness- that relates to the divine, then the “I” is you, or your spirit and cannot go beyond or get out of the human consciousness, the body, the soul, and the spirit.
Your religion is not absolute, it has flaws.
That is the reason why one cannot mix the bible with other religion, or gods, or writing, or philosophies. The bible is the absolute written word of the almighty God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Everytime one mix other writings with the bible one will see flaws.
One sees flaws because the bible is a human construct -- not a Divine construct. It was written by many authors from many perspectives about God. You may as well see and treat it for what it is, rather than what you'd like it to be.
Thank you for your thoughtful responses Muffled.
The reason you interpret the scripture in the way you do is because your viewpoint comes from a conceptual dualistic perspective. Iow, you see yourself as separate from God and it therefore logically follows that you understand the scripture on a basis of this underlying mental interpreted dualism.
Jesus on the other hand, according to my understanding of non-duality, was born a mortal soul (albeit with the mission to become a vehicle for God incarnation), and realized the Divine unity of existence and taught others on the basis of this underlying direct unity.
For that reason, you and others who interpret the teaching of Jesus based on conceptual dualism will not have the same understanding with those who are aware of the Divine underlying unity of existence, seen and unseen, immanent and transcendent.
Understanding this, there is no point in taking to task each other's position point by point, as everyone's present position is a logical result of their present state of understanding of 'what' and 'who' they really are in the context of cosmic existence, and therein lies the difference of present understanding.
So assuming we have established the reason of our respective differences, and since there is no desire to persuade you otherwise other than just pointing out there is another way of understanding,..there seems little else to say,..except perhaps,...amen.
But do feel free to respond again if you will...
That doesn't mean he did not spoke those words it simply means we cannot verify those things.
Hi BornAgain, I just wanted to give you another point of view for the sake of variety .
The life that God breathed into Adam (Genesis 2:7) was more than just animal life; it was the breath of God, resulting in a being with a soul. Adam was created spiritually alive, connected to God in a special way. He enjoyed a relationship with God, but when he sinned, that relationship was broken. Spiritual death has implications both before and after physical death. Though Adam was still physically alive (but beginning the dying process), he became spiritually dead, separated from relationship with God. In this present life on earth, the effect of spiritual death is the loss of God's favor as well as the knowledge of and desire for God. Scripture is clear that everyone begins life dead in trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1-5), resulting in a life focused on our sinful desires. Jesus taught that the remedy for spiritual death is a spiritual rebirth (John 3:3-5) through faith in Him. This rebirth is a re-connection to the source of life, which Jesus pictured in John 15:1-6. He is the vine, and we are the branches. Without being connected to Him, we have no life in us, but when we have Jesus, we have real life (1 John 5:11-12). - How is physical death related to spiritual death?
You have a good argument here, but I cannot figure out your exact thoughts on this one. If you are thinking of Romans chapter 6, then I have to agree with you.I am proposing that the experience Jesus had, is a possibility to every human being and not limited to Jesus Christ alone.
Totally mis-quoted these words supposed to have been said by the Lord Jesus Christ. No where in the bible youll find these words together.Jesus said: I am the light of the world and you are the light of the world'.
These two statements constitute the good news of Jesus.
If you are not arguing then you must be agreeing that Jesus Christ alone is one with God, and the ONLY Son of God.I am not arguing that Jesus Christ alone is one with God.
I am arguing that every human being has this possibility.
This is the fundamental question. Do you believe that only Jesus Christ is one with God?
I had some free time and something pulled me to look at this site and see what has been going on... Anyways, i was reading a book that had brought up the Universe and how Time, Space, and Matter make up our 1 Universe. All of Time, All of Matter, and all of Space make up 1 Universe, yet we have 1 Universe.
Gen 18:1 Now the LORD appeared to him by the oaks of Mamre, while he was sitting at the tent door in the heat of the day.
Gen 18:2 When he lifted up his eyes and looked, behold, three men were standing opposite him; and when he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them and bowed himself to the earth,
Gen 18:3 and said, " My Lord, if now I have found favor in Your sight, please do not pass Your servant by.
Can God be 3 men if he so chooses to be? Isnt God, God?
in Love,
tom
Makesty thyself a god.Joh10:33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.
Obviously it's referring to the "Class of being of a god" and not "God Himself".The Lord Jesus Christ’s argument on this is,
Joh10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?
This commonly mistranslated phrase stems from a completely dishonest wording of the Hebrew quote of the Psalm which has no vocative case. It's "Thy throne is (the) God" or along those lines of "(The) God has given you your throne".Heb1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
Thy throne given of God is for ever and ever; a sceptre of equity is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
So God Himself went to Sodom in the form of Two different beings?
how do you see Gen 19:24 where Jehovah rained down sulfur from Jehovah in Heaven?
however, i had simply said that God can express himself as 3 persons or men if he so chooses. To say he cannot would be limiting God. (as Gen 18:1-3 shows) These 3 men are called Jehovah and Gods word says Jehovah appeared as these 3 men.
What is your point you are trying to show with Gen 19?
In Love,
Tom
There is, however, no grammatical basis for such an inference. In
accordance with the construction of the Hebrew language, we find that in
the first half of the verse, the reader is informed who caused the
brimstone and fire to fall upon the two cities. In the second half of
the verse he is told for emphasis, not only from whom it came but also
from where. The verse emphasizes that it is "from the Lord," in order to
leave no doubt as to who is in command of events.
An individual will often speak of himself in the third person instead of
using the first person. Examples of this may be seen in the following:
Lamech said, "Hear my voice you wives of Lamech" (Genesis 4:23), not "my
voice"; similarly David said, "Take with you the servants of your lord"
(1 Kings 1:33), and not "my servants"; and Ahasuerus said, ". . . in the
name of the king" (Esther 8:8), not "in my name." They are all referring
to themselves in the third person not to another personality. Likewise,
when God speaks of Himself in the third person He is also not speaking
of another personality.
God uses the technique of speaking in the third person about Himself in
a number of scriptural contexts. It is a common feature of the
Scriptures, when "the Lord" (HaShem) speaks, for the text to repeat the
noun rather than make use of a pronoun (e.g. Genesis 18:19; Exodus 3:12,
24:1; Numbers 19:1-2; Zechariah 1:17).
As we can see, the use of "from the Lord" rather than "from Him," in the
verse under discussion, conforms to the biblical usage. There is no
scriptural reason to assume that two divine personalities are mentioned.