Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The reason I say it, is the concepts in some of the Hadiths do not align with what is prophesied in Quran 43:60-77, and in multiple other religious texts saying the same thing.
I accept Christ as a physical being; yet the terminology Yeshua is a Hebrew word meaning Salvation, so when you questioned am I your Saviour, "no", I'm more like God's avenging angel, before billions are removed in the Judgement Day Fire, for already being anti-Christ's doctrine.
I've always had memories from two thousand years ago, some since 5-6 years old from before I could read.
If we read first comes the Parable of the Fig (Matthew 24:32-35, Mark 13:28-31, Luke 21:29-33), then the sun & moon are darkened, then stars (meteors) fall from the sky (Matthew 24:29, Mark 13:24-25, Luke 21:25-26), as Betelgeuse is seen to have gone supernova at Armageddon (Zechariah 14:7, Joel 2:31, Isaiah 13:10, Amos 5:8).
We will all see the coming destruction according to prophecy, yet only those worthy will ever get to stand before the Throne of the Son of Man; the rest according to prophecy get removed from reality into outer darkness, for already being anti-Christ's doctrine, and contrary to the Law (Isaiah 8:20-22).
The idea people are so transfixed on the suffering, and death of the Messiah part, is where Isaiah 28's Bed of Adultery was purposely set up to remove them at the Judgement Day Fire, for being against a living Messiah.
He was and is the "essence" of God Almighty.
As far as I can see from the Bible, I believe we can show Paul & Simon the stumbling stone (petros) purposely corrupted the teachings of Yeshua to a more Pharisaic ideology - Creating Christianity between them in Antioch (Acts 11:25-26) with the help of the Sanhedrin.
Where it is also possible to show that the Gospel of John was purposely made up by the Sanhedrin, to corrupt Yeshua's original message.
It is being questioned historically, that the original followers of Yeshua were the Ebionites; which stemmed from the Essenes, then the Nasoraeans & Mandaeans.
It is questioned James the Just was Head of the church of Jerusalem, and an Ebionite; where the terminology 'Poor Ones' was prophesied in Zechariah 11:11 prior to the 2nd temple destruction.
The idea that the Nasoraeans/Mandaeans fled Jerusalem prior to the destruction, is because they were following Yeshua's teachings.
Paul & Simon taught an idea that the Jews were now under Grace, as Christ had died for them; rather than what scripture shows, that they were placed under the Curse of Moses (Deuteronomy 28), because their Worthless Leaders (Sadducees, Pharisees, Levites) rejected the Messiah for 30 pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:1-14).
Proof that the Curse was placed is that in Zechariah 11:9, it repeats the idea that they will eat each others flesh as found in Deuteronomy 28:53-55; where we can show historically, that at the Siege of Jerusalem by the Romans, they literally eat each others flesh due to being starved to death.
To me it is clear that the book of James in the Bible is standing against Paul, on some of the similar concepts that were debated between them. Some of these contrary points, are Paul kicking people out who didn't want to follow his sacrificial Messiah's death & resurrection doctrines, impartially deciding who is worthy of being part of Pauline Christianity, Abraham being faithful, and thus doing good works, etc.
When Revelation 2:2 says about the False Apostle who tried to get them to follow his fake Gospel, Paul also stated that he was rejected by the Church of Asia Minor with his own version of the Gospel (2 Timothy 1:15).
Because over time Christianity has become the main orthodox view on the teachings of Christ, the original ideas have been partially overwritten; yet it is still possible to see from the texts alone, that the original message is still there in the Synoptic Gospels.
I understand it could be possible for us to fix this as part of Messianic prophecy; otherwise in my understanding scripture says God will condemn the Rabbinic Jews for having lied to humanity (Jeremiah 5:26, Isaiah 29:20-21).
It appears to me that what the Pharisees did, is try to cover up the prophesied concepts they'd been cut off, to make the Gentiles follow a system supporting them, and in doing so creating the false representation of the Messiah.
Thus when there are Jewish texts called the Sefer of Zerubbabel that refer to a true, and false Messiah both in Rome; the problem I find, is that the Rabbinic Jews don't realize they've made up the false Messiah contrary to the real one, that they have overwritten. Thus when in Ezekiel 22:3, and other places, it says they made their own idols, this is talking about how they made the Messiah into an idol.
I believe as a provable return of the Messiah it is possible for me to redeem, and fix this situation (Isaiah 52:3-7) - if I can get the support from the Rabbis, to help fix what they've messed up; otherwise Judgement Day will come, and God will just keep the Enlightened Saints who've already noticed.
To quickly summarize the difference between the original followers, and the Pharisaic Christianity: Is that the Pharisees taught an Oral Tradition, that "the death of the righteous, can atone for the sins of that generation"...
Where Yeshua challenged the Sanhedrin, and cut them off, for saying that the murdering of the prophets counted as atoning sacrifices in Matthew 23:27-38, Mark 7:1-13, and the Parable of the Wicked Husbandman (Matthew 21:33-46, Mark 12:1-12, and Luke 20:9-19).
Yeshua is prophesying in the Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen that the Pharisees will corrupt his message, teaching you get an inheritance from his death; when instead it is saying many will be condemned by God at Judgement Day for believing such a thing.
In my opinion.
Not really, as posting there is Midrash showing Simon worked with the Sanhedrin, and Yehoshua/Yeshua specifically named Simon the stumbling stone (petros) to fulfil prophecy (Zechariah 3:9, Isaiah 8:14-16), that they'd deceive the world...
There isn't an official Q source, it is a hypothesis, and in my understanding it was possible there was an Ebionite collection of what Yeshua said, this was what we're calling a Q source...
There isn't anything wrong with us questioning the Synoptic Gospels, and I find it anti-Islamic to say otherwise; yet I get the modern day Muhammadans before judgement Day, think they have the authority to speak bad about religious texts (4:150-151).
The Gospel of Barnabas doesn't have a majority of the necessary context prophesied in the Tanakh; which Yeshua is expounding on using the prophetic method.
I'm not sure if English is your native language, as you seem to be misunderstanding what I've said on multiple occasions.
What were you referring to then?
Not really, I've learned about religious text for the sake of helping others; I find knowing theology the most crucial:
Not really, I've learned about religious text for the sake of helping others; I find knowing theology the most crucial:
As if we can explain the mechanisms, yet we don't know the way; it is a bit pointless having all that knowledge, with no end goal in mind.
In my opinion.
We've got Bible software to justify that what we've got, has been purposely corrupted; where Allah foretold the whole thing, and then we have people arguing about which book is best.
I'll explain my standards, and if asked will justify it in detail.
For me to logically explain to you how I understand a prophetic timeline in the Bible, which is also referenced accurately in the Quran; means accepting all the texts as evidence, to be able to decipher them efficiently.
Wasn't saying my name is there in the Quran, as haven't got a high enough comprehension to justify it.
The Quran refers to the Messiah as the Word of God in (3:45, 4:171).
I find it is easier to understand the Source of reality, which is beyond form is like a Universal Central Processor, it formulates everything, and yet exists beyond even form its self.
I was referencing the Biblical prophetic timeline, and how the Quran referenced these concepts.
The Legacy is we're here before Judgement Day ; I'm just explaining my findings before Betelgeuse goes supernova, then the internet will be gone anyway.
We can show that who ever recorded the Gospel of John, had to be a member of the Sanhedrin, as it records multiple aspects of where the Pharisees were sent from, and their private conversations; plus personal data, that only a member of the Sanhedrin would have known.
Nope as I'm not a scholar; I'm a musician, artists, poet, like King David... Sent as a final warning before the Judgement Day Fire, and then the resurrection.
Yes I was aware they've added words; yet I'm also aware of where the Quran translations have done the same...
The Messiah is a specific spiritual King appointed by God with a message; I know the Message I was given, not all the academic scholarly stuff...
Actually if the authors of John are the Sanhedrin who hated Yeshua without a cause, it is highly important; as it means it isn't based on trying to establish truth, it is based on misrepresentation of Christ's character.
Whereas I'm saying I can explain prophecy through multiple religious texts, all having a similar timeline, and I say the Quran has some of that info confirming it right, and you say it doesn't... When you don't even understand why I was saying that prophetic timeline existed.