The last prominent democratic KKK leader was recently buried, with Biden and Hilary giving them a last hurrah at their funeral.This makes no sense. But let's remember these Democrats were conservatives, and today are republicans
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The last prominent democratic KKK leader was recently buried, with Biden and Hilary giving them a last hurrah at their funeral.This makes no sense. But let's remember these Democrats were conservatives, and today are republicans
Christianity is the church of Peter, the "worthless shepherd" of Zechariah 11:17, and the "false prophet" Paul. I am not a follower of either. And that "house" (church), is about to "fall" (Matthew 7:24-27).I pointed out how many Christians over the millennia have behaved in ways that are contrary to what Jesus taught, but somehow the instututions of Christians have been corrupted. How about your type of Christianity? I don't see anything that suggests you follow Jesus in your posts.
According to Revelation 13, those "who dwell on the earth" are deceived and follow the "dragon"/devil. Those who are "deceived" include the "Christians", who follow the beast of Revelation 13:11, Constantine, the establisher of the Roman church. They constitute the "many" who follow false prophets (Mt 7:12-15). Their "leaders"/kings are the servants of the "devil" (Rev 16:13), and will bring the "nations"/Gentiles upon Jerusalem in the "day of the LORD" whereas they will be judged (Joel 3:2) and "destroyed" (Jeremiah 30:11) and sold into slavery (Joel 3:6). I think your god Marx, the father of communism/socialism, the Progressives, has sold you down the river.Can you admit that many Christians through history were criminal, and give Christianity a bad name? What do you do to give Christianity a good name? Citing your beliefs only tells us you are willing to believe what others told you to believe.
Atheism is the first principal of these philosophies.Atheism is not the same as these political philosophies
And guess what planet you dwell on. So the text is a trap, and believers thinking they are in some dreamscape instead of earth have been fooled.According to Revelation 13, those "who dwell on the earth" are deceived and follow the "dragon"/devil.
Looks like you forgot what Jesus taught, judge not....Those who are "deceived" include the "Christians", who follow the beast of Revelation 13:11, Constantine, the establisher of the Roman church.
Accusing Catholics of being wrong when you violate what Jesus taught is a bad argument. Who is really following false prophets here? What makes Martin Luther correct some 1500 years after Jesus and 1200 years of Catholicism? What makes your version of protestantism correct over other versions? It seems that all of Christians points fingers at every other version, and none can show they are correct over the rest. False prophets is what the diversity of Christianity is built on.They constitute the "many" who follow false prophets (Mt 7:12-15). Their "leaders"/kings are the servants of the "devil" (Rev 16:13), and will bring the "nations"/Gentiles upon Jerusalem in the "day of the LORD" whereas they will be judged (Joel 3:2) and "destroyed" (Jeremiah 30:11) and sold into slavery (Joel 3:6).
Nice accusation that is false on so many levels. Can you explain why you believe you need to attack me in the is way, and do so making religious, political, and personal assumptions?I think your god Marx, the father of communism/socialism, the Progressives, has sold you down the river.
Atheism is a stand alone idea. Theism in politics has a history of human rights violations and a lack of freedom. The founding fathers of the United States realized a secular government was optimal.Atheism is the first principal of these philosophies.
Today's mountains are evidence of continental drift over billions of years. The sudden existence of continents amd the appearance of the mountains in your outrageous scenario is again a violation of basic physics and the energy involved would destroy the earthObjective evidence is:
1) modern continents
The fossils in the mountains on the surface are in formations that extend deep within the mountains and again are evidence of uplift due to continental drift over billions of years. You neglected basic physics in your education.2) marine fossils on high mountain areas
Oil and gas fields are in rock formation millions of years old deep in the earthl3) oil, gas and coal fields;
Today's mountains are evidence of continental drift over billions of years. The sudden existence of continents and the appearance of the mountains in your outrageous scenario is again a violation of basic physics and the energy involved would destroy the earth4) Orogenic mountains and other vast sediment formations.
There are evidence of many ice ages in the thousands of feet of rock formation. The Bible does not even mention ice ages. Hoe is this remotely evidence for Noah's Flood,5) Ice age
Human existence of primitive settlements date well before the flood in an orderly sequence of the evolution of human culture for over 300,000 years.6) Developed human societies are about as old as if they begun from after the flood.
These stories have been directly proven to be local floods occurring at different times just as they occur today There is no evidence of a world flood. They are local events like river floods, and Tsunamis.7) Stories of a great flood in almost all nations.
That is a ridiculous claim, based on nothing substantial.
Who?!?!?!The last prominent democratic KKK leader was recently buried, with Biden and Hilary giving them a last hurrah at their funeral.
Does that include the Republican Party?Atheism is the first principal of these philosophies.
Your wave theory of light was a theory, which was superseded by a more appropriate theory, including particles, which is still, only a theory. Your "objective verifiable evidence" often leads to faulty "theories". Looking at the covid fiasco, it is a wonder anyone listens to you or your Mr. Science, Mr. Fauci.No it is not the reason. Your intentional ignorance is without limits. ALL theories and hypotheses in science require objective verifiable evidence. If not the theories and hypotheses would not be accepted theories and hypotheses.
Well, there are probably Atheist within the Republican party, and they would be called Rhinos. On the other hand, the new age Progressive Democrats, would top the list with respect to the number of Marxist Atheist.Does that include the Republican Party?
Your intentional ignorance remains over whelming. You lack the basic understanding of even what theories and hypotheses are in science you should have learned in college.Your wave theory of light was a theory, which was superseded by a more appropriate theory, including particles, which is still, only a theory. Your "objective verifiable evidence" often leads to faulty "theories". Looking at the covid fiasco, it is a wonder anyone listens to you or your Mr. Science, Mr. Fauci.
Well, there are probably Atheist within the Republican party, and they would be called Rhinos. On the other hand, the new age Progressive Democrats, would top the list with respect to the number of Marxist Atheist.
I think that goes against basic physics.Today's mountains are evidence of continental drift over billions of years.
That is not true.The sudden existence of continents amd the appearance of the mountains in your outrageous scenario is again a violation of basic physics and the energy involved would destroy the earth
I don't think there is any intelligent reason to believe so.The fossils in the mountains on the surface are in formations that extend deep within the mountains and again are evidence of uplift due to continental drift over billions of years.
No good reason to believe that.Oil and gas fields are in rock formation millions of years old deep in the earthl
Please prove first that there is 100,000 annual deposits of a seasonal pollen.The presence of lake lamella deposits over 100,000 years with a pollen layer between each layer is impossible to form under flood conditions.
The vase limestone deposits cannot be formed under flood conditions.
Please present evidence of how annual lake deposits with a seasonal pollen layer can be deposited in a world flood.
The ice age is logical conclusion of long raining period and dying of all creatures on top of dry land.There are evidence of many ice ages in the thousands of feet of rock formation. The Bible does not even mention ice ages. Hoe is this remotely evidence for Noah's Flood,
If humans have existed over 200,000 years, why do you think the first known large city is just 9,000 years old? Why didn't people develop all that we have now, over 100,000 years ago?The first known large city is 9,000 years old; Human Civilization’s First Cities: 7 of the Oldest
You need to explain how the amount of energy required for mountains to rise, continents to form and ocean floor to form through ocean floor spreading in a short period of time. I gave the basic physics information necessary to determine that. You have only responded with assertions based on an ancient tribal agenda without xcience,I think that goes against basic physics.
That is not true.
It is the actual physical evidence that determines this,I don't think there is any intelligent reason to believe so.
Simple geologic facts of the geology of oil and gas deposits..No good reason to believe that.
Each annual layer contains a pollen layer deposited in the spring, We can observe this happening every year in the present.Please prove first that there is 100,000 annual deposits of a seasonal pollen.
This does not offer an possible explanation for over 100,000 layers each with a pollen layer directly observed to be deposited every year today.One way to make it look like that is for example several harvest season in a year. Or water has carried deposits from dry land several times in a year.
The ice age is logical conclusion of long raining period and dying of all creatures on top of dry land.
The actual evidence of the gradual evolution of human technology over time. Your foolish myth dors not explain cities existing 9,000 years ago and villages existing 25,000 years agoIf humans have existed over 200,000 years, why do you think the first known large city is just 9,000 years old? Why didn't people develop all that we have now, over 100,000 years ago?
The claim that mountains rise is against basic physics, except in the case of volcanoes. There is no natural force that would rise mountains. Mountains seem to rise, because water level is going down.You need to explain how the amount of energy required for mountains to rise, continents to form and ocean floor to form through ocean floor spreading in a short period of time. I gave the basic physics information necessary to determine that. You have only responded with assertions based on an ancient tribal agenda without xcience,
It can be true. Yet, it can also be true at the same time that there are several "spring times", or that on spring time can cause several "annual" layers if rains drag it partially several times. For example, 10 think layer of annual pollen on dry land and after that first rain takes 1 on part of that, and forms the first "year", then second rain takes second part of the pollen and forms another year and so on. It is possible to form many "annual" layers in a year, even if today we don't see it happening.Each annual layer contains a pollen layer deposited in the spring,
I would first need some good reason to believe they are that old. However, 25,000 is relatively new, in comparison to 200,000 years. And I am bewildered how you can believe in over thousands of years without any good evidence.Your foolish myth dors not explain cities existing 9,000 years ago and villages existing 25,000 years ago
Who?!?!?!