Simplelogic
Well-Known Member
Why the first century? Is that the convenient date to base your belief around Jesus?
All the way from 586 BCE to 140 BCE Israel was under occupation. Sometimes bad and sometimes good occupation.
Then from 140 BCE till 37 BCE it wasn't only to end up as a client Kingdom of Rome and then a Roman province.
Why cherrypick the fall of the second Temple? Why not the first?
Perhaps we missed the Moshiach in 586 BCE. Would make sense because we lost the one and only first Temple and everything which was inside it. Contrary to the empty second Temple.
Perhaps the Moshiach was some Jew in 586 BCE. Makes more sense than him being Jesus.
First off..there is no such thing as "good occupation".
No cherry picking. I have addressed the Babylonian exile and the reasons for it many times. When Israel learns the way of the nations around them, they lose sight of YHVH. Israel even got to the point of offering their own children on fires to Molech!! The reasons for the Babylonian exile are clear in the scriptures. This exile lasted 70 years.
Here is the true question. If Israel got 70 years of diaspora for these evil sins, as well as ignoring the Torah…what could have been the reason for a 2000 year diaspora?? My question is still valid.
Please note that I commend the Jewish people for the rejection of Christianity and all its sects. This movement which started in Antioch truly taught against the Torah and the Jewish people. But what if a prophet came and taught pure Torah/repentance to the people. What if the religious leaders rejected this man because he was exposing their false power hold on the people?? What if a clever benjamite came in after him and turned him into a pagan sun god hybrid?? What if this "clever benjamite" was actually prophesied to do exactly that in the Torah!!
What if Israel rejected the ONE call back to true Torah observance?