• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"digital blackface"

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I don't agree with the article in the OP, but I don't see this as a "relentless attack" either. I lived in a country where the wrong kind of speech could literally lose people their heads, so I see this one as just an inconvenience at most.
I understand. I was speaking from the point of view of a civilized person.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I think most people in the world are civilized. The laws and dogmas imposed on or taught to them? Not always so!
And I think most people in the world are concerned primarily about feeding their kids, making the rent, finding a way to live in a bit of peace. All those dogmas and other crap are the concern of people who don't have to worry about such trivialities. They have time and means to worry about who is saying what to whom, and who might possibly make their getting more prosperous more difficult.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Actually, it's quite nice to see how many members recognize that the relentless attacks on how we speak, how we make references, how we think are just plain stupid. I'm glad so many of us know that language is always going to be problematic, and require some flexibility and leeway from all of us.
Yeah. It seems that, when even the majority of the left-wing, woke people on RF are shaking their heads, the writer of the article stretched his activism beyond the breaking point. (Or is a troll.)
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Thanks although I'm still not 100% sure what people mean when they use woke

In the pejorative sense, it means the kind of person who is offended by the “insidious racism of digital blackface”.

When people say “but it just means wanting to reduce inequality and is something to be proud of” this misses the point that something done with purportedly good intentions can be harmful if taken beyond a certain point.

It’s good to be protective of your children, but bad to be overprotective.

Some folk will still say “But how can it be wrong to want to keep your children safe? I wear it as a badge of honour to be called overprotective”

The subjectivity depends on where you draw the line between protective and overprotective, woke and “woke”…
 

rocala

Well-Known Member
I have never seen the point or any value in using an image of some utterly unimportant celebrity (whatever their race) to make a point. Should a situation arise when I feel such images may express something better than my language, I will go and learn another language.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I don't know, there are a whole lot of Republicans clutching at their pearls right now over library books and drag shows.
Both sides of the aisle clutch pearls, eh.
But the OP's theme appears to afflict the left side.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
My thoughts are 'Gee, it's great that we have time to gaze deeply at our navels. Not sure who it's helping though.'

Aussiefaced.

crocodile-dundee-thats-a-knife.gif
 

Alien826

No religious beliefs
Just musing ...

I often wonder if this kind of thing creates or perpetuates racism, or merely reflects it. If the latter, then it's probably best ignored or maybe just used as an example, as even if the symptom is suppressed the disease will pop up in another form.
 
Top