• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

do anyone need further explanation


  • Total voters
    31
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
There are even those who ignorantly believe that Satan planted the bones lol.
Oh. Sorry. I read, "There are even those who ignorantly believe that Santa planted the bones."

Well... I thought it was funny. :D

I can totally see Santa Claus standing next the archeological dig, laughing, "Ho, ho ho! Surprise! Those bones aren't real!"
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
Oh. Sorry. I read, "There are even those who ignorantly believe that Santa planted the bones."

Well... I thought it was funny. :D

I can totally see Santa Claus standing next the archeological dig, laughing, "Ho, ho ho! Surprise! Those bones aren't real!"

SHHHH no one is supposed to know that.... you want to bring the wrath of his elves down on you.......
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Oh. Sorry. I read, "There are even those who ignorantly believe that Santa planted the bones."

Well... I thought it was funny. :D

I can totally see Santa Claus standing next the archeological dig, laughing, "Ho, ho ho! Surprise! Those bones aren't real!"
Yea it is funny, who knows he may have lol.:)
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
okay why is their a ton of spammers on this tread. I suggest people who reply to me put up a intelligent reply that relates to my topic. Please do not put up random links because that is similar to plagiarism. What you read you need to explain and not just throw a link or a qoute because anyone can do that. It gets on my nerves when people add a link or write a qoute but can not explain what they are trying to say or how it relates to the topic of the thread.

Before I Wrote any of this stuff I did a well done research and investigated the whole subject so that I would not make myself a fool and so that people wouldn't not try to find loop holes to try to make themselves sound like they were correct. Everything written is valid and can be confirmed- nothing is made up.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Well, of course not! It's because we blindly just accept whatever scientists and other experts say and ignore the protests of God and his is designated representatives on earth because Satan really has hold of us and we're all going to burn forever in Hell because we won't accept the obvious truth because it's always presented in such a whacked-out way that we don't recognize it for what it is because we're blinded by the Devil who is controlling the Government and all those evil Atheists and their Godless Agenda that includes the Big Bang, Evolution, Socialism, Liberalism and the LGBTQ Conspiracy...sorry, had to stop and take a breath there...
Unfortunately, that's the type of church I was raised in.:(
But luckily "the devil" got to me while I was still a teen.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
No, they haven't.

Give me names if you know any who did.
if you actually took time to do a research you would know that the dinosaur fossils are rock sediment fossils. You claim they are not, than what type of rock sediment is it. It has to be a type of rock sediment so please explain and tell me what type of rock sediment is it.
 

McBell

Unbound
if you actually took time to do a research you would know that the dinosaur fossils are rock sediment fossils. You claim they are not, than what type of rock sediment is it. It has to be a type of rock sediment so please explain and tell me what type of rock sediment is it.
You forgot to present the name(s)...

Not that anyone is surprised.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
okay why is their a ton of spammers on this tread. I suggest people who reply to me put up a intelligent reply that relates to my topic. Please do not put up random links because that is similar to plagiarism. What you read you need to explain and not just throw a link or a qoute because anyone can do that. It gets on my nerves when people add a link or write a qoute but can not explain what they are trying to say or how it relates to the topic of the thread.

Before I Wrote any of this stuff I did a well done research and investigated the whole subject so that I would not make myself a fool and so that people wouldn't not try to find loop holes to try to make themselves sound like they were correct. Everything written is valid and can be confirmed- nothing is made up.
It's because it's far too likely you'll just dismiss it. You are, afterall, the one claiming that dinosaurs, something we have very solid evidence of, never actually existed because it's all a part of some grand scheme. You're trying to say that there is some problem with the fact they weren't discovered until the mid 19th century, even though that has not in any way ever prevented something from existing (DNA, atoms, sub-atomic particles).
And, actually it does seem plausible dinosaur bones were discovered prior to that, but instead of calling them "dinosaurs" we may have been calling them "giants" or "titans" or other names of mythical creatures of large size and stature.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
I'm saying that when you take into consideration the conditions that the fossils frequently end up in, there's nothing to be gained from hoaxing that.

Fossils hoaxes, as I understand it, tend to be complete. Or they tend to be some "missing piece" that's hypothesized and/or highly sought after. For instance, if I were a paleontologist, and fossils suddenly showed up on my desk that were labelled as the long-lost Amphicoelias(a dinosaur only known from a single bone that was lost over a century ago, and was estimated at the time, probably inaccurately, to be the largest dinosaur of all), a hoax would be the first thing I assumed it was and would test for. Basically, they're things that are in high demand.

However, most real dinosaur fossils are incomplete. There's no glory to be had by showing up to a conference and saying, "Hey! I found a random femer in the ground!" Paleontology is a largely collaborative field, with contributions from several scientists that largely act independently from each other. (Just like pretty much all the other sciences, actually.)

And furthermore, the kinds of sacrifices often made are simply not worth it if these were hoaxes. People WENT TO FREAKING PRISON over an incident regarding a T-rex skeleton, named Sue, that was found on politically hot land a few decades ago.

And FINALLY, allow me to reiterate. Dinosaurs not only existed for real, they still exist. Dinosaurs are still around!
anyone can create an incomplete or complete fossil. What would be hard about creating an incomplete fossil. In fact it would be easier to create an incomplete fossil as it lessens the job of designing a completer fossil.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
The sciences deal in evidence, not "proof"; that's part of mathematics, logic, and philosophy.
the term scientist is vague and can mean anyone in the science field. A paleontologist is not a chemist or a doctor in the medical field. You must be specific and use paleontologists when dealing with dinosaurs or prehistoric animals. You can use geologist. The TERM "SCIENTISTS" IS OVERUSED BY MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO IDEA WHAT PALEONTOLOGY is or the process of discoverying fossils or any type of fossil.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
So what is it about my statements that you have issue with? That fossils were known of thousands of years ago? That DNA has been found in Neanderthal fossils? If the DNA sequenced in the Neanderthal genome project wasn't from a Neanderthal fossil, then where was it from?

I never said that "dinosaur" fossils were known back then. I only said "fossils". In this particular case, fish and sea shell fossils: "In the 6th century B.C.E. Xenophanes of Colophon (died ca. 490 B.C.E.), who was a disciple of Anaximander, developed Anaximander's theories further. He observed fossil fishes and shells, and concluded that the land where they were found had been underwater at some time."

What about fossilized shark teeth found to wash up on beaches? Did the conspirators make a bunch of fake teeth, dump them into the ocean and then hope that they would wash up on beaches for random people to find?

If dinosaur fossils are simply cast from molds, then how did the hoaxers create microscopic internal structures within them analogous to real bone?

If all fossils are fakes composed of sandstone or limestone cast from molds, then there would be no such thing as "subfossils" (remains that are only partially fossilized). Yet subfossils do exist, like this partially fossilized piece of wood. How could subfossils be faked?

Also, why are there "Christianity" and "Jesus" tags on this thread? Seems pretty irrelevant to whether dinosaurs are real or not.[/QUOTE]

MY REPLY BELOW

we are talking about two separate things. I'm talking about FOSSILS OF PREHISTORIC ANIMALS AND DINOSAURS. You on the other hand are talking about bones of people found in europe that some paleontologist are trying to claim are cave men or descendents of cave men.
I'm talking about FOSSILS and your trying to change it to bones found in Europe. As I already mentioned to you CARBON C 14 DEPLETES in objects depending on the weather and elements like the amount of sun rays and not every location has the same type of weather. Carbon 14 DOES NOT EXIST IN A FOSSIL because the FOSSIL IS A ROCK SEDIMENT WHICH IS SAND STONE.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
anyone can create an incomplete or complete fossil. What would be hard about creating an incomplete fossil. In fact it would be easier to create an incomplete fossil as it lessens the job of designing a completer fossil.
You do realize that what you are proposing would literally the the biggest conspiracy ever proposed. It would involve scientists from virtually every nation on earth. You are talking about a conspiracy that would have lasted for over 200 years. What force could unite all these people from all over the world and keep the secret conspiracy going for all that time?
 

McBell

Unbound
You do realize that what you are proposing would literally the the biggest conspiracy ever proposed. It would involve scientists from virtually every nation on earth. You are talking about a conspiracy that would have lasted for over 200 years. What force could unite all these people from all over the world and keep the secret conspiracy going for all that time?
Seems some people do not let reality interfere with their beliefs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top