dinosaurs never existed. The dinosaur fossils were created by paleontologist scam artists.

[superdestructionyou]

Funny, fossils have been known of for hundreds of years before Christ (The Greek philosopher Xenophanes knew of them). That's quite one long-running, world-wide conspiracy you got going on there. Also, DNA has been found in some fossils. How did that get there if they are faked? Were the members of the "Neanderthal genome project" in on the conspiracy too? Neanderthal DNA is similar (but importantly, not identical) to the DNA of modern man.

you just wrote random things that you have no idea what you talking about. I suggest you write a more in depth description of what you trying to say and explain how you agree with the the subject you are talking about. So that you don't waste you time DINOSAUR FOSSILS WERE NEVER FOUND IN ANCIENT TIMES nor during the roman or greek empire esp. not by any Greek philosopher Xenophanes. Many people of that time believed in many idols esp. stone idols. They were also superstitious

 

[Riverwolf]

but paleontologists have confirmed its sandstone rock sediment.

No, they haven't.

Give me names if you know any who did.

 

[superdestructionyou]

Did you know that we now know exactly what colors some dinosaurs were?

do you think I was born yesterday

Yes there are. No sculpture or mold cast has the same chemical composition as real fossilized remains, which are quickly and easily identifiable in lab testing. Fakes are mostly circulated among non-professional collectors, not paleontology labs. They're the ones who are the ones debunking fakes, not creationists and conspiracy theorists.

and your sources are or this an assumption of yours.

 

[superdestructionyou]

No, they haven't.

Give me names if you know any who did.

if google what is a dinosaur fossil is you will find out its sandstone, I don't know why you keep on asking me. Why wouldn't it be sand stone if the material where the fossil is buried in is sand, i really don't know how you can't figure that out.

 

[Riverwolf]

do you think I was born yesterday

Actually, that would give you an advantage in this bit of knowledge because you wouldn't be emotionally stuck in a nostalgic connection to the beautiful but long outdated depictions in Jurassic Park like so many of us are.

Wanna see some confirmed colors?

 

[Riverwolf]

Why wouldn't it be sand stone if the material where the fossil is buried in is sand, i really don't know how you can't figure that out.

Have you ever actually handled a real fossil for yourself?

 

[ADigitalArtist]

and your sources are or this an assumption of yours.

I've actually put fossil samples under microscope and checked myself. Have you? You've literally done nothing in the field and your sources are a bunch of crackpots.

 

[superdestructionyou]

how paleontologist are able to create sandstone fossils.

 

[superdestructionyou]

I've actually put fossil samples under microscope and checked myself. Have you? You've literally done nothing in the field and your sources are a bunch of crackpots.

and what did you find and see in your microscope.

 

[Riverwolf]

View attachment 13235
how paleontologist are able to create sandstone fossils.

Huh. That looks uncanilly NOTHING like how fossils actually look when in the ground.

Not the least of which being, of couse, that it's INCREDIBLY rare for complete skeletons to show up; in fact, I'm not sure any even exist. It's not uncommon for our entire knoweldgebase of a given dinosaur to come from just their leg and hip bones plus a bit of vertebrae. (As you can imagine, that makes for a frustratingly small knowledgebase.)

 

[superdestructionyou]

Huh. That looks uncanilly NOTHING like how fossils actually look when in the ground.

Not the least of which being, of couse, that it's INCREDIBLY rare for complete skeletons to show up; in fact, I'm not sure any even exist. It's not uncommon for our entire knoweldgebase of a given dinosaur to come from just their leg and hip bones plus a bit of vertebrae. (As you can imagine, that makes for a frustratingly small knowledgebase.)

that picture is taken from paleontologist researches of course I did modify by adding letters of how the scamming is done.

 

[Riverwolf]

that picture is taken from paleontologist researches

1. Which ones?
2. So what?

 

[Riverwolf]

this taken from a geology source "Examples of sedimentary rocks include limestone, sandstone, mudstone, greywacke, chalk, coal, claystone and flint".

Just "a geology source"? No names? No links?

the picture I just posted.

Not a complete sentence. Is English not your first language?

Incidentally, this is how large dinosaur fossils actually look while still in the ground:

 

[superdestructionyou]

Just "a geology source"? No names? No links?



Not a complete sentence. Is English not your first language?

Incidentally, this is how large dinosaur fossils actually look while still in the ground:

well if you look it up you would know that exactly how the process of fossilization is according to paleontologists and geologists.
"this is how large dinosaur fossils actually look while still in the ground" Of course the fossils are large and the layer they are buried in is in a lagoon of rock sediments made of sandstone or limestone that is easily breakable. The dried lagoon of rock sediment in which it is buried in is on top of a real terrain which most of the times is a real ingeous rock sedimentary layer that would be impossible to dig unless you have bulldozers. The rock sediment is nothing more than dried up cement and sand or lime stone powder.

 

[Riverwolf]

well if you look it up you would know that exactly how the process of fossilization is according to paleontologists and geologists.

You're making the claim, you supply the links. Don't rely on the inherent unreliability of a search engine's algorithsms for your sources. You don't know what sources I'll end up getting, nor do you know what sources will show up five, ten, twenty years from now.

"this is how large dinosaur fossils actually look while still in the ground" Of course the fossils are large and the layer they are buried in is in a lagoon of rock sediments made of sandstone or limestone that is easily breakable. The dried lagoon of rock sediment in which it buried in is on top of a real terrain which most of the times has a real ingeous rock sedimentary layer.

Dude, are you paying attention to how the fossils are arranged? Can you construct a full dinosaur just from the bones you can see in the picture?

 

[superdestructionyou]

You're making the claim, you supply the links.



Dude, are you paying attention to how the fossils are arranged? Can you construct a full dinosaur just from the bones you can see in the picture?

okay what are you trying to say.

Also I have explained in full detail exactly what I'm talking about and anyone can confirm it by doing their own research. You so far have not done any serious explanations of what you are trying to support.

 

[Riverwolf]

okay what are you trying to say.

I'm saying that when you take into consideration the conditions that the fossils frequently end up in, there's nothing to be gained from hoaxing that.

Fossils hoaxes, as I understand it, tend to be complete. Or they tend to be some "missing piece" that's hypothesized and/or highly sought after. For instance, if I were a paleontologist, and fossils suddenly showed up on my desk that were labelled as the long-lost Amphicoelias(a dinosaur only known from a single bone that was lost over a century ago, and was estimated at the time, probably inaccurately, to be the largest dinosaur of all), a hoax would be the first thing I assumed it was and would test for. Basically, they're things that are in high demand.

However, most real dinosaur fossils are incomplete. There's no glory to be had by showing up to a conference and saying, "Hey! I found a random femer in the ground!" Paleontology is a largely collaborative field, with contributions from several scientists that largely act independently from each other. (Just like pretty much all the other sciences, actually.)

And furthermore, the kinds of sacrifices often made are simply not worth it if these were hoaxes. People WENT TO FREAKING PRISON over an incident regarding a T-rex skeleton, named Sue, that was found on politically hot land a few decades ago.

And FINALLY, allow me to reiterate. Dinosaurs not only existed for real, they still exist. Dinosaurs are still around!

 

[psychoslice]

Call them what you like, large animals did exist, you would have to be living on another planet not to realize this.

 

[Riverwolf]

Call them what you like, large animals did exist, you would have to be living on another planet not to realize this.

Heck, most of them weren't/aren't even all that big.

 

[Purusha]

Call them what you like, large animals did exist, you would have to be living on another planet not to realize this.

Proof?