PruePhillip
Well-Known Member
Which of them had a choice?
They had lots of choices.
For much of the Roman world, and amongst Jews, declaring yourself a Christian could be a death sentence.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which of them had a choice?
You can't flag an American flag at someone else's home against their will and stated wishes.
Ever been snowboarding?Love 'em.
Why?
I understand for a long long time no-knew how to process them for eating. Watch the Greeks doing it - it's very simple, like most inventions usually are.
Ever been snowboarding?
It's not about being conservative (or liberal or political at all), it's a matter of traditional Church teaching.That's what I thought. There are liberal Catholics but in the end the church is conservative right??
Never even been in snow. Looks fun. Our Australia has a benign, warm climate - snow is rare.
Ever used a jet ski?
The Pope hasn't changed it. He can only call on us to be more compassionate towards each other, but he cannot bless sodomy.
The Romans didn’t get people’ opinions before execution. Only Roman citizens could have a chance in hell of escaping punishment that makes Texas look pacifist. Romans would execute people as sport. Must be all the lead in their diet. I don’t see the apostles going up to the cops and begging to be martyred. Peter escaped from jail several times. Jesus ran. So much for willingness to die.They had lots of choices.
For much of the Roman world, and amongst Jews, declaring yourself a Christian could be a death sentence.
The Romans didn’t get people’ opinions before execution. Only Roman citizens could have a chance in hell of escaping punishment that makes Texas look pacifist. Romans would execute people as sport. Must be all the lead in their diet. I don’t see the apostles going up to the cops and begging to be martyred. Peter escaped from jail several times. Jesus ran. So much for willingness to die.
Well:I believe you are referring to "freedom of speech" - which is not "freedom of expression" - they are not the same thing.
No, those are flags of a political movement that supports things that are against Church teaching. Not to mention the whole idea of someone basing their identity around sexuality runs against the Christian view of the human person, as well. They are certainly welcomed at church, or should be if they feel they are not, but those flags have no place in a Catholic institution.True, homosexual acts are not approved, but that does not mean a homosexual person is to be excluded. They remain the 'children of God' and as such are welcomed. The 'flags' are nothing more than a symbol of that truth.
That is a very narrow definition of "freedom of expression" - and the source you quoted from even claimed that certain "expressions" are limited.One final item:
Well:
What are freedom of speech and expression?
The Constitution’s First Amendment gives individuals the right to express themselves. Freedom of speech is a basic form of expression, but the First Amendment covers much more than just speech.
An individual can express herself through religious practice; through political speech or actions; by associating with others; by petitioning the government; or by publicizing written speech. Even certain “speech actions” like flag burning are considered protected speech... -- Freedom of Speech and Expression | Subscript Law
Because you seem to want to invent "alternative facts", I've lost interest in our discussions.
Finally, goodbye.
No - the homosexual person coming into the church and worshipping would be "a symbol of that truth".True, homosexual acts are not approved, but that does not mean a homosexual person is to be excluded. They remain the 'children of God' and as such are welcomed. The 'flags' are nothing more than a symbol of that truth.
No - the homosexual person coming into the church and worshipping would be "a symbol of that truth".
Correct - and that's how it should be.They do come and worship, and are welcomed with the rest of us sinners.
There are a lot of LGBT people who disagree with the "Pride" Movement.
Just as there are a lot of Black people who disagree with what BLM is doing and saying.
Though paradoxically the endemic rape of children doesn't seem to bother them. maybe that's why they awarded Jimmy Saville a Papal knighthood? Still you're right, I mean a flag ffs???The Pride Flag is a symbol of many behaviors and acts that the Catholic Church would consider sinful.
COUGH>made up BS<COUGH!!!There are a lot of LGBT people who disagree with the "Pride" Movement.
We are all children of God - we should respect and tolerate one another - we should not accept beliefs or behaviors we believe are sinful.We all disagree about a lot of things, yet our togetherness and respect for and acceptance of one another unites as the children of God.
Again - flags are not people - movements and organizations are not people.Instead of concentrating on what you believe is wrong with the other
"Most men worry about their own bellies, and other people's souls, when we all ought to be worried about our own souls, and other people's bellies."
- Rabbi Israel Salanter