Ingledsva
HEATHEN ALASKAN
This theory also wxpects you to believe that Isaiahs son also had two names. Just a heads up.
aik!
One name Emmanuel, but More then two monikers - Mighty Warrior, etc.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This theory also wxpects you to believe that Isaiahs son also had two names. Just a heads up.
aik!
One name Emmanuel, but More then two monikers - Mighty Warrior, etc.
Please provide one shred of evidence that Isaiahs son did any of this
As pointed out, Jesus never called himself divine. or to be more fair, he never did so in a way that excluded anyone else's divinity. His only two claims of divinity are inclusive:I am as a name of God is as inclusive as you get ( we are all I ams) and when he was asked about saying he was a god by the pharisees he answered with scripture that said EVERYONE is God. His statements of being son of God are also inclusive giventhe rayer he taught us make us say OUR Father.
So what truly puzzles me is a Christian ignoring his own divinity. Which I find n bunches
JWs do not believe Jesus is the God of Israel, they believe he was God's first creation and therefore his special son above all the other angels, he was the arch angel Michael in his pre-human existence. So yes Jesus is divine to them in terms of being the arch angel but he isn't divine like God who is almighty all powerful, can create life and is the law giver.
Both of these have already been answered by me, and others, in this thread.
Immanuel is Isaiah's son by the temple virgin.
These events took place back then.
They are not writing about a future Jesus.
Oops - It was in the "Was Jesus the Messiah thread - so -
7:1 tells us we are talking about Isaiah and Ahaz.
Isa 7:1 And it came to pass in the days of Ahaz the son of Jotham, the son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin the king of Syria, and Pekah the son of Remaliah, king of Israel, went up toward Jerusalem to war against it, but could not prevail against it.
Isa 7:3 Then said the LORD unto Isaiah, Go forth now to meet Ahaz, thou, and Shearjashub thy son, at the end of the conduit of the upper pool in the highway of the fuller's field;
7:10-13 tells us God tells Ahaz to ask for a sign, but Azah feels this would be an imposition.
7:14 tells us THEN God gives AHAZ a sign - Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin maiden shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Emmanuel.
NOTE - the sign is for Ahaz whom is with Isaiah!!!!!
8:1 Here he is told to record concerning Mahershalalhashbaz. His ceremonial name.
8:3 He wrote -And I (Isaiah)went unto the prophetess; and she conceived, and bare a son. Then said the LORD to me, Call his name Mahershalalhashbaz (Fast to the plunder, swift to the prey.)
8:8 Tells us HE, EMMANUEL.
8:18 Here ISAIAH tells us HE and his CHILDREN are for SIGNS, just as it says up in 7:13-14 and 8:3!
Isa 8:18 Behold, I (Isaiah) and the children whom the LORD hath given me are for signs and for wonders in Israel from the LORD of hosts, which dwelleth in mount Zion.
Isa 7:8 even gives us a time - ...,and within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken, that it be not a people.
If you look up Emmanuel in a Strong's, for instance, it will tell you Emmanuel is the name of Isaiah's son - also called Mahershalalhashbaz - Isa 8:3!
Look at 9:6-7 in Hebrew, this is not talking about Jesus. Where they translated it Mighty God - it is probably Mighty warrior - though it doesn't have to be as we are told humans are called god in the Bible - "Ye are gods"
In later verses such as 9:11 it is still talking about Rezin.
Isa 9:11 And YHVH will set up Rezin's foes against him, and join together his enemies;
SO! This all takes place at the time of Resin - and the child is not Messiah, or Jesus.
I looked through the posts and didn't find one where you say you posted on this.
I believe I did say that there is misinterpretation and this is a prime example.
I am not concerned about who we are talking about but only who God is talking about. God says nothing about Isaiah but no doubt He is speaking through Isaiah to Ahaz: Isa 7:11 Ask thee a sign of Jehovah thy God; ask it either in the depth, or in the height above.
God did not say to either Ahaz or Isaiah "I am giving you a son as a sign."
Isa 7:13 And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David: Is it a small thing for you to weary men, that ye will weary my God also? This say the sign is for the house of David which is ostensibly saying to anyone in a leadership position in Israel.
I believe this verse does not equate Isaiah's son with Immanuel and Isaiah's son is not named immanuel. Isaiah already had a child so his wife wasn't a virgin or even a young maiden.
Signs are signs. I believe mention of one sign does not necessarily mean that all signs are alike.
So then how do you view Everlasting Father?
So you are saying that an everlasting throne was set up for Ahaz? Where is this person who still sits on the throne of Israel?
Look it up in your Strong's --- H6005 --- "Isaiah's son"
Sorry, My Strong's is in storage and in tough shape. So what does Strong's have to do with anything since it contains compilations by men and is not scripture?