Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
That's the real bold one. Even Hitler didn't broadcast the worst if what he was doing.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do All Republican Candidates Favor Insurrection?
- Thread starter Revoltingest
- Start date
Majesty
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, I am not playing this game with you. I will compromise. Admit that you have no idea what an insurrection is and I will find valid definitions for you.Great .. then give us the post number so we can read your definition of insurrection and your explanation of why this fits the Capital Protest
You are just playing a silly game because even you probably know that "insurrection" is not a legal term. You know how you accuse others of "deflection" when you are wrong. This is an example of you trying to use deflection.
Laniakea
Not of this world
And our borders need to be secured.
Also, inflation needs to be brought under control.
Laniakea
Not of this world
Are you seriously going to do a Godwin on us now?
The desperation just gets more obvious.
Laniakea
Not of this world
Why are you deflecting by not answering his question? I've been waiting for the answer as well, and you continue to disappoint.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Go look in a mirror if you want to see desperation.Are you seriously going to do a Godwin on us now?
The desperation just gets more obvious.
Laniakea
Not of this world
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Because his question is a pointless deflection. If he does not even know what an insurrection is he has disqualified himself from debating.
Laniakea
Not of this world
You're accusing of deflection while deflecting. Straight from the democrap handbook.
Your playing the silly game with yourself. I simply asked you to provide your definition of insurrection .. explaining why this is what Trump is guilty of .. and it is you who keeps deflecting for more than 10 times now.
What have I deflected from ? you havn't asked anything .. only running from clarifying your position .. because you know as soon as you do .. your position is lost .. and that the Colorado Judge is 3rd world Kangarooland.
and what do you mean "not a legal term" .. if that is the case then Trump is not guilty ... but it is a legal term as per section 3 .. and so he is not off the hook on that basis. .. just more silliness, strawman fallacy and deflection on your part.
Trump is not guilty of insurrection .. because there was no insurrection to be guilty of .. and certainly your claim that he is guilty of insurrection is false because you can't even define what you are talking about.
Crucified ?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You need to take an economics class. Our inflation is more in control than Europe's The cause of inflation was the pandemic. The crazy spending started under Trump, and it was the right thing to do. Biden had to continue it for a while. And now the bill is due. Inflation is making up for the crazy spending.
As to our borders, they are fairly secure. The problem is unrest in other countries. Did you know that a refugee is legal once they cross the border and turn themselves into the border patrol? That is both US and international law.
How would you keep refugees out?
No, the question was asked either as a deflection or showed that the person asking should not be debating the topic due to extreme ignorance.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Not true at all. To your originally poorly asked question you were given a perfectly good definition of insurrection and you have been deflective ever since.
You should not even have to ask such a question. There are questions that demonstrate that the person asking is not acting as an honest interlocutor.
You are the one who can't seem to manage to state what definition of insurrection you are using in your claim that Trump is guilty of "insurrection" .. what difference would it make what other folks know about insurrection .. it is your definition that is required to support and clarify your claim that folks are guilty of "insurrection" as per section 3 ..
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Projection, try again.
If you have no clue you have to at least be honest enough to admit it.
nothing poor about the question - "Define insurrection in context" - the context obviously being the OP.
Did you not understand that the Capital Protest was the context friend ? If you want to claim folks are guilty of insurrection .. you have to state what definition you are using .. otherwise your claim is unintelligible nonsense.
Just read what you wrote friend .. find me some reference to the topic in your post .. nothing but personal invective .. rather than clarifying your position by giving your definiton of insurrection .. without which your claim that the Capital Protesters were guilty of insurrection is unintelligible nonsense.