• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do All Republican Candidates Favor Insurrection?

Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Sargonski said:
nothing poor about the question - "Define insurrection in context" - the context obviously being the OP.

Did you not understand that the Capital Protest was the context friend ? If you want to claim folks are guilty of insurrection .. you have to state what definition you are using .. otherwise your claim is unintelligible nonsense.
Click to expand...
Once again, if you want to demand answers you have to own up to your own extreme ignorance.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Sargonski said:
Just read what you wrote friend .. find me some reference to the topic in your post .. nothing but personal invective .. rather than clarifying your position by giving your definiton of insurrection .. without which your claim that the Capital Protesters were guilty of insurrection is unintelligible nonsense.
Click to expand...
No, not at all. All that I ask for is a little bit of honesty.
 
S

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
No, not at all. All that I ask for is a little bit of honesty.
Click to expand...

Self deception is not honesty .. neither is strawman fallacy .. pretending others have been dishonest .. another unsupported claim .. as a deflection from the crucifixion of your position.

It is difficult I know .. coming to grips with the reality that the cancel culture prog-blue "Insurrection" trope is the big lie .. and so if you wish for some honesty .. you might first stop reciting that .. and look not to that Kangrooland for hope.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Sargonski said:
Self deception is not honesty .. neither is strawman fallacy .. pretending others have been dishonest .. another unsupported claim .. as a deflection from the crucifixion of your position.

It is difficult I know .. coming to grips with the reality that the cancel culture prog-blue "Insurrection" trope is the big lie .. and so if you wish for some honesty .. you might first stop reciting that .. and look not to that Kangrooland for hope.
Click to expand...
Just drop the projection. The two of you only have me responding to you. That is not because you defeated others. It is because I am the only one stubborn enough who thinks that you can be forced to reason properly. Though I am getting to the point where I do not care either.
 
SkepticThinker

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Laniakea said:
Don't parrot conspiracy theories now.
Based on the Constitution and election laws, he won.
Click to expand...
Um nope. Based on the Constitution and election laws, Trump lost the election.
The lie is to say he won, which he does every single day over and over. He just can't seem to prove it in a court of law. Because there is zero evidence that Trump won the election.

I can't believe people seriously believe him and actually believe he won. It's absurd. And it's pure propaganda.
 
Laniakea

Laniakea

Not of this world
Subduction Zone said:
As to our borders, they are fairly secure. The problem is unrest in other countries. Did you know that a refugee is legal once they cross the border and turn themselves into the border patrol? That is both US and international law.

How would you keep refugees out?
Click to expand...

10 million people illegally crossing into our country is hardly "secure".
How to keep them out? Stop having border patrol agents there to simply welcome them in. Stop letting them cut the barbed wire put in place and removing sections of the wall to let them in.
Other countries know how to do it. Perhaps we should learn from them. Of course, that's assuming that the illegals are coming in because we don't know how to secure the border, when in fact they are simply being allowed in.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Laniakea said:
10 million people illegally crossing into our country is hardly "secure".
How to keep them out? Stop having border patrol agents there to simply welcome them in. Stop letting them cut the barbed wire put in place and removing sections of the wall to let them in.
Other countries know how to do it. Perhaps we should learn from them. Of course, that's assuming that the illegals are coming in because we don't know how to secure the border, when in fact they are simply being allowed in.
Click to expand...
You did not answer my question fully. What happens if asylum seekers show up at border crossings en masse? How do you keep them out?
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Laniakea said:
With whatever force is necessary.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but that would not be possible. There are people that have the right to cross the border, that need to cross the border. You can't just shut down the border to refugees. That is US law. You could possibly try to funnel all of the refugees into the border crossing areas, but that is about it.
Laniakea said:
My turn: what is your definition of insurrection?
Click to expand...
You know the rule on that. You have to admit to not understanding it yourself first.
 
S

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
No, not at all. All that I ask for is a little bit of honesty.
Click to expand...

and honesty is what you have been given. You honestly failed to provide us with the definition of insurection you think applies
Laniakea said:
With whatever force is necessary.
My turn: what is your definition of insurrection?
Click to expand...

Seems our friend is having trouble giving an honest answer to the simple question of insurrection .. *Staff Edit*
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top