twist it turn it and shake it up until it comes out non violent if you must.
The OT is violent, the NT is not. Those verses people cite in the NT, such as those you lifted from the evilbible website, are really bad understandings of what is being said by Jesus. I'm quite open to criticizing and questing everything about the Bible and the NT as well, not taking anything at face value or in an act of faith. Hardly so. But in doing this, what I read on inflammatory sites such as evilbible, how they approach the texts, has equally as much fundamentalist agenda behind it putting on the blinders as the fundamentalist Christians do, in ignoring things.
There is a term for that and it is called, cherry picking. Twisting and turning is going on in the militant atheist camps equally as much as the religious fundamentalist camps. It's two sides of the exact same coin, neither truly interested in understanding beyond their assumptions.
why disregard my post that looks favourably on the NT, the testament of Christians.
I didn't see that. Could you point me to it?
I thought jesus was anti everything in the old testament, hence the reason you have a new one.
That's a poor misunderstanding of what Jesus was about, or early Christianity to put on point on it. I'll put it this way, what I see it was about is to try to get to the heart of what religion really is. It's not about this group or that group, it's not about rules and laws and traditions, but about the human heart in its desire to know God, or the Absolute, or Emptiness, or Ground of Being, or choose whatever term you wish. Religion in its forms can become a substitute for that, and as it does, it actually stands in the way of someone knowing God. To me, Jesus was about tearing down the religious structures that denied access to God, to get people to look within and find Truth in the heart.
But ironically, he then was turned into the same sort of religion his message was against!
But it's simply what happens with people who find religion, but not God. You see it in Buddhism, you see it in all religions. Was the Buddha
against Hinduism in your understanding?
my point is why still have the old testament, kind of goes against Christianity if common sense applied.
In practice most Christians don't use it. They use it as more just a lineage document, a sort of family history, but it's traditions are not followed.
What the OT is, is really more an historical artifact in their minds. And many, not all, also understand much of the NT that was as well. Not a literally, infallible document, but one that contains material of the time and is to be understood as such.
Their was something in those verses about giving your first born, how is that.
On the subject of killing, I believe their was a flood sent according to the old testament that killed everyone except for a dozen people, or am I wrong, perhaps God was sending them a little water for their crops.
Yes, these are all mythological ways of understanding the world back then. I see no reason to accept them as literal facts, or reflective of what God actually, literally does or did. It's how they understood it at the time.
The value in the stories in knowing how it expressed something existential within themselves, something in their own human heart in trying to relate to themselves in the world. And just as we thought as a child and understood as a child, that child evolved, matured, and still exists in us. Those stories are everyone's stories, because we came through the stage of being a child to being who we are today. So understanding as such, we can relate to it in ourselves and see a greater truth beyond that simple, literal perception through the child's eyes alone.
don't get upset at a person pointing something out you don't like, if it disgusts you to the point you must deny its words then why follow it.
I'm not upset about it, I'm disappointed that you don't have greater insight than this. But I suppose it doesn't matter what religion one is in, and I know this.
I am not a former Christian with an ax to grind, just find that unlike muslims,jews and Buddhists Christians don't like questions about certain things, they get all *****.
Actually, that comes to where people are at in their growth. There are plenty of Buddhist who are in the exact same camps. Are you sure you're not too?
It's confusing, the Bible says in one verse Heli is josephs father,in another its Jacob.
we die because of Adam and eves original sin, in another a man should not pay for his fathers sins.
The ot combined with the nt causes problems, extra stories added by emperor Constantine even more confusing, the Bible is all over the place with over 400 contradictions.
And that is a fact.
The problem I have is drawing these things from atheist sites is not about gaining understanding. It's about fault-finding for the fact of dismantling a religion they dislike for personal reasons, which they understand as poorly as the fundamentalist believers themselves do. The Sutra's suffer as much additions and alterations as the Bible does, yet this is not a reflection on the religion however.