uwontchange
New Member
I don't buy it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Plants know what season it is, they know when it is day or night, they know when they are injured, they know when something is trying to hurt it, etc... Do they feel? Perhaps not like you or I "feel", but I think they do on some level we don't understand.
Given how different cell to cell communication is in plants do you think an animal like system is to be expected? Also many animals survive without brains or nervous systems. Jellyfish for example can process images without a brain.
Also, what is your opinion on plant to plant chemical communication and plant to insect communication?
wa:do
I suppose it would depend on how we define 'feeling' and 'consciousness'. I've posted some about plant communication which I find good fodder for thought experiments.No, an animal-like system can't be expected in plants, but no research has shown that plants possess a system that allows them to feel (the premise of the OP). If there is reputable peer-reviewed evidence to the contrary, then I would be interested in reading it.
What makes Jellies so interesting is that they don't even have a basic ganglion. It's not sure how their eyes process information, at least I have yet to hear anything on it.Regarding jellyfish, a number of animals survive with just a basic ganglion (as opposed to a fully-fledged brain or nervous system) to process information. Some species of worm are able to differentiate between light and dark, despite possessing nothing more than a basic eye-spot.
many animal reactions are just responses to increases in air-borne chemicals. Insects in particular, which is why they respond to plant chemical signals so well.Regarding plant-plant communication, yes I agree that there are instances where trees under attack from insects, for example, will emit chemicals that are detected by other trees in the vicinity, stimulating an increase in defence chemicals which may deter their herbivory. However, in the nature of the OP, does this constitute 'feeling' or a sense of consciousness in plants, or merely a response to an increase in air-borne chemicals?
I think in honor of this thread we should all vow to eat more meat. I mean yea the animal has to die, but one animal can provide so many meals where many plants have to suffer to make just one meal. It is only common sense at this point to agree that meat is the more humane solution to this overwhelming problem. :yes:
A response to stimuli that recognizes a threat to an organisms well-being...? bit verbose...
wa:do
What, and eat their babies?!?!If it worries you, you could just become a fruitarian.
So I planted four beans which I kept in my room with classical music playing loudly at least 6 hours a day, and I planted 4 which I kept in my younger sister's room with no music or sound as much as I could manage. Only two of the beans grew at all, one in each room, and the one in the room with the music got eaten by my cat, so I really couldn't find anything conclusive about the experiment. I was hoping maybe one group would grow better, but I guess not.
Neither do I.I'm not sure how blasting music at a plant is supposed to prove anything about feeling.
wa:do