CynthiaCypher
Well-Known Member
But you're using a different set of facts.
We're all really objecting to each other's "facts".
She converted to Islam, that makes her a Muslim right?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But you're using a different set of facts.
We're all really objecting to each other's "facts".
And I'm Indian. You really expect me to go about this whole thing without a bargaining war ? You must be out 'ya mind, son !
And 40/60 should do the trick. The 60 being your half.
So basically the gist I get is...
It's not bigotry to HAVE a (religious) culture, but it is bigotry to want to PRESERVE it- especially so if you are European whitey or a Jew. And it's bigoted to not see the rules and customs of other (religious) communities as equally applicable as yours to people in your respective community. Yeah, sounds very "multicultural" and "pluralistic" and not at all like culturicide via cultural Marxism. And then people on the left of the political spectrum are scratching their heads wondering why right-wing views have begun to gain traction amongst Jews and Europeans
That is imposing, you are setting upon her a definition she does not abide by. That is imposition. She is a Muslim practicing Islam period. She is not pretending to be a Muslim, she is not just merely believing she is a Muslim, she is in fact a Muslim. The facts are,she is a Muslim. You are the one who is doing the believing not her. I am just sticking to the facts.
I never said she was pretending to be a Muslim. She is sincerely practicing Islam. I on the other hand, still view her as a Jew. My holy scripture which I believe comes from perfection teaches me that it is impossible to not be Jewish when you were once a Jew. So, to me, she is still a Jew. I don't see why you see this as anything bad. It also means to me that her kids will be Jewish. I'd have no objection towards my children marrying hers, regarding religion.
You could say I'm wrong. You could say I'm delusional. I just think that this woman is still Jewish. And I don't think that makes me a bigot, or someone that is imposing something on her.
I mingle w/ "outsiders". I believe that "breeding w/ outsiders" is ok if they convert/join the community, or even to a lesser extent if they intend to give the children a Jewish upbringing and education.It's bigotry to perceive mingling or breeding with outsiders as an existential threat to the survival of your culture.
Secular liberalism though tends to encourage people to leave their culture and/or community b/c it looks down upon values contradictory to it (like any other culture, admittedly). So in that sense, it is somewhat problematic.Cultures that are pretty good, like secular liberalism, attract more, but minority cultures are in no danger of extinction if left unmolested.
I never said she was pretending to be a Muslim. She is sincerely practicing Islam. I on the other hand, still view her as a Jew. My holy scripture which I believe comes from perfection teaches me that it is impossible to not be Jewish when you were once a Jew. So, to me, she is still a Jew. I don't see why you see this as anything bad. It also means to me that her kids will be Jewish. I'd have no objection towards my children marrying hers, regarding religion.
You could say I'm wrong. You could say I'm delusional. I just think that this woman is still Jewish. And I don't think that makes me a bigot, or someone that is imposing something on her.
No, we will tolerate (and I actually am a big fan of the state of Israel continuing to exist) Jews who are okay with live and let live. Claiming being born a Jew obligates you to that form of worship is no different than the disfellowship crap the JWs throw around.
Is this really that hard to understand? If someone doesn't believe, they are allowed to quit. If that's a problem, then you're a bigot.
I mingle w/ "outsiders". I believe that "breeding w/ outsiders" is ok if they convert/join the community, or even to a lesser extent if they intend to give the children a Jewish upbringing and education.
Secular liberalism though tends to encourage people to leave their culture and/or community b/c it looks down upon values contradictory to it (like any other culture, admittedly). So in that sense, it is somewhat problematic.
The Jews have existed for thousands of years, and will continue to exist for thousands more. Western liberalism will not last another 100 years, it will die out since most of them have no kids. There should be more proselytizing by Judaism, heavy proselytizing.
I come from a small community which has adopted this no intermarriage rule, but it's not very smart and it's being totally rejected by my generation. Aside from Middle Eastern heritage, we have a considerable amount of South Asian, Mongol and East African mix. The no intermarriage rule cannot work in a world like ours, which is highly dynamic and changing. I've met ex-Muslims Iranians who know more about my faith than I do.
The Jewish community has a good amount of mix as well, and if it has worked for so long it can continue to work for longer. Proselytize away.
The most important question: why is Sanaya Irani so beautiful ?
I do not really either condone nor condemn the idea of proselytization. Judaism is a faith which recognizes that people are different enough from one another that the world will never be united under the guise of a single monolithic religious organization. I think as such it doesn't really make much sense to explicitly desire mass conversions. Also, I think it's better that people turn to Judaism on their own volition rather than through peer-pressure. And I don't see many people who'd be willing to convert due to people's misconceptions of Judaism (as seen on this forum) as well as the fact that there still is deeply-rooted anti-Semitism in many places. I think what is needed is better education on what Judaism is for both Jews and non-Jews alike.The Jews have existed for thousands of years, and will continue to exist for thousands more. Western liberalism will not last another 100 years, it will die out since most of them have no kids. There should be more proselytizing by Judaism, heavy proselytizing.
I come from a small community which has adopted this no intermarriage rule, but it's not very smart and it's being totally rejected by my generation. Aside from Middle Eastern heritage, we have a considerable amount of South Asian, Mongol and East African mix. The no intermarriage rule cannot work in a world like ours, which is highly dynamic and changing. I've met ex-Muslims Iranians who know more about my faith than I do.
The Jewish community has a good amount of mix as well, and if it has worked for so long it can continue to work for longer. Proselytize away.
I do not really either condone nor condemn the idea of proselytization. Judaism is a faith which recognizes that people are different enough from one another that the world will never be united under the guise of a single monolithic religious organization. I think as such it doesn't really make much sense to explicitly desire mass conversions. Also, I think it's better that people turn to Judaism on their own volition rather than through peer-pressure. And I don't see many people who'd be willing to convert due to people's misconceptions of Judaism (as seen on this forum) as well as the fact that there still is deeply-rooted anti-Semitism in many places. I think what is needed is better education on what Judaism is for both Jews and non-Jews alike.
Also, Jewish customs are a bit different than the Parsi ones I am assuming you're speaking of- Jewish communities never disallow people from converting and the marriage laws are less stringent AFAIK.
Lol I don't find most Parsi girls pretty. =/