Originally a Dutch term, ietsism is a form of nontheism that asserts there is some unspecified transcendent reality beyond the mundane. It is expressed in the statement, "I feel there must be more to reality than the physical universe, but I have no idea what that 'more' could be." Do you find ietsism a likely and/or plausible belief?
Sure, but I don't find much value in thinking about what that mystery is anymore.
Yes, there probably are aspects of reality yet undiscovered that would be jaw-dropping to learn, but I don't expect to have any revealed to me in this life or after death.
As another poster said, it's an intuition, which I define as a compelling to irresistible hunch. We can call in idea an intuition when we can say that we feel strongly that we are correct but can't say why or demonstrate that we are. I do not consider this knowledge, which I define as the collection of demonstrably correct ideas.
But I recognized that I reached the end of my ability to decide more about the nature of the unseen reality, and it lost my interest. I still have the intuition, but I don't wonder about what it tells me. I don't expect to ever know more, and so I don't think about it.
What interests me about this topic is how many people become endless ponderers of this matter. It occupies their attention repeatedly indefinitely.
I like the mystery of not knowing what's out there, and that includes not knowing much about the unknowable God.
I'd prefer answers, but they're not available, and calling that mystery a god doesn't add anything for me, so I don't.
This sounds a lot like some sort of faithless intuition
Agreed.
One recognizes the logical need and thereby likelihood for some sort of transcendent reality to explain this one, yet will not accept a transcendent 'being', or 'entity' along with it.
Why call it a being? That's just a guess.
I can certainly understand and appreciate this perspective. But for myself, it seems unnecessarily timid.
Timid? No, intelligent. Rational. You imply cowardice or weakness of spirit, but I would just remind the forum that not once has anybody who claimed to have special ways of knowing ever provided a single useful insight gleaned by whatever method they use to "see further." What you imply is courageous is a waste of energy to me.
I know. I noticed that decades ago when I was in the stage of my philosophical education when I did consider such things. Once they've been thought out - and we notice this if we are able when we see that we've just been spinning in circles long enough and decide to divert attention elsewhere.
And as a result, it's probably going to be quite ineffective
It been effective in the sense that I've moved on. I don't see any benefit to you or anybody else to keep chasing one's tail in idle speculation indefinitely. Like I said, I'm still waiting to see the benefit to any of you who do this. Tell me what it does for you that I might want for myself?
It's treating "I don't know" as though it were an impediment, when it is in fact a gateway to tremendous possibility. And if we allow ourselves to walk through that gateway and explore those possibilities, we can begin to discover their effectiveness.
I consider recognizing and explicitly saying, "I don't know" to be a virtue whenever that is the case.
And once again, you depict this as some kind of journey with rich rewards, but what are they? Where are they in you? It sounds like you have some itch that needs perpetual scratching, but word it as a fruitful journey full of promise and reward. Where's the beef?