• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

do you have to believe in hell?

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
That would be a question for general debates I would imagine.

Probably. And we should attempt to define which concept of hell we are talking about, too.

Hell isn't nearly as ill-defined a concept as "god", but it is still ambiguous enough.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
The problem is that your question needs a definition of hell to fully make sense.

Sartre said that hell are other people. Would you say that he taught of hell?

It seems to me that you need some reflection and desensitivation towards that concept, if I dare say so.

Even in Christianity and Islam (the only two faiths that make much of a point of having a hell far as I know) all it takes is being properly selective to find healthy pockets of thought that do not bother with hell to any significant extent. Such pockets, in fact, are arguably their most legitimate lines of doctrine.
 
Last edited:

willy1590

Member
The problem is that your question needs a definition of hell to fully make sense.

Sartre said that hell are other people. Would you say that he taught of hell?

I mean a hell that is Torturous,painful,spears to the eyes type hell,any Buddhist school not agree with that kind of hell?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I mean a hell that is Torturous,painful,spears to the eyes type hell,any Buddhist school not agree with that kind of hell?

Any reasonable person, Buddhist or not, would agree that people can go through torturous, painful states of mind. In that sense, Buddhists are no different.

But if you want to know whether there is any Buddhist school that does not believe in hell as an afterlife realm, or an eternal state - well, I doubt there are any that do believe in such an odd concept.

Traditionally, we do not believe in hell except as a mental state.
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
But what anguish is this,like do we feel pain in bUddhist hell?
Dhammapada 1:1-6
1. Mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with an impure mind a person speaks or acts suffering follows him like the wheel that follows the foot of the ox.

2. Mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with a pure mind a person speaks or acts happiness follows him like his never-departing shadow.

3. "He abused me, he struck me, he overpowered me, he robbed me." Those who harbor such thoughts do not still their hatred.

4. "He abused me, he struck me, he overpowered me, he robbed me." Those who do not harbor such thoughts still their hatred.

5. Hatred is never appeased by hatred in this world. By non-hatred alone is hatred appeased. This is a law eternal.

6. There are those who do not realize that one day we all must die. But those who do realize this settle their quarrels.
You can be in anguish (hell) anywhere if you have mental hang-ups. (impure mind in verse 1) Buddhism's goal is to cure ourselves of our mental hang-ups in the here & now. (pure mind in verse 2)
 

willy1590

Member
What about these buddhist hell descriptions,the one about the extreme cold,extreme fire,is this to be disregarded or what does it mean?
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
What about these buddhist hell descriptions,the one about the extreme cold,extreme fire,is this to be disregarded or what does it mean?
This is hellfire:
Adittapariyaya Sutta: The Fire Sermon
"Bhikkhus, all is burning. And what is the all that is burning?

"The eye is burning, forms are burning, eye-consciousness is burning, eye-contact is burning, also whatever is felt as pleasant or painful or neither-painful-nor-pleasant that arises with eye-contact for its indispensable condition, that too is burning. Burning with what? Burning with the fire of lust, with the fire of hate, with the fire of delusion. I say it is burning with birth, aging and death, with sorrows, with lamentations, with pains, with griefs, with despairs.

"The ear is burning, sounds are burning...

"The nose is burning, odors are burning...

"The tongue is burning, flavors are burning...

"The body is burning, tangibles are burning...

"The mind is burning, ideas are burning, mind-consciousness is burning, mind-contact is burning, also whatever is felt as pleasant or painful or neither-painful-nor-pleasant that arises with mind-contact for its indispensable condition, that too is burning. Burning with what? Burning with the fire of lust, with the fire of hate, with the fire of delusion. I say it is burning with birth, aging and death, with sorrows, with lamentations, with pains, with griefs, with despairs.

"Bhikkhus, when a noble follower who has heard (the truth) sees thus, he finds estrangement in the eye, finds estrangement in forms, finds estrangement in eye-consciousness, finds estrangement in eye-contact, and whatever is felt as pleasant or painful or neither-painful- nor-pleasant that arises with eye-contact for its indispensable condition, in that too he finds estrangement.

"He finds estrangement in the ear... in sounds...

"He finds estrangement in the nose... in odors...

"He finds estrangement in the tongue... in flavors...

"He finds estrangement in the body... in tangibles...

"He finds estrangement in the mind, finds estrangement in ideas, finds estrangement in mind-consciousness, finds estrangement in mind-contact, and whatever is felt as pleasant or painful or neither-painful-nor-pleasant that arises with mind-contact for its indispensable condition, in that too he finds estrangement.

"When he finds estrangement, passion fades out. With the fading of passion, he is liberated. When liberated, there is knowledge that he is liberated. He understands: 'Birth is exhausted, the holy life has been lived out, what can be done is done, of this there is no more beyond.'"

That is what the Blessed One said. The bhikkhus were glad, and they approved his words.

Now during his utterance, the hearts of those thousand bhikkhus were liberated from taints through clinging no more.​

You can find a description of Buddhist hell here:
Devaduta Sutta: The Deva Messengers
phrase repeated throughout the sutta:
yet he does not die as long as his evil kamma is not exhausted.​
So, what is kamma?

Nibbedhika Sutta: Penetrative
"'Kamma should be known. The cause by which kamma comes into play should be known. The diversity in kamma should be known. The result of kamma should be known. The cessation of kamma should be known. The path of practice for the cessation of kamma should be known.' Thus it has been said. In reference to what was it said?

"Intention, I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.

"And what is the cause by which kamma comes into play? Contact is the cause by which kamma comes into play.

"And what is the diversity in kamma? There is kamma to be experienced in hell, kamma to be experienced in the realm of common animals, kamma to be experienced in the realm of the hungry shades, kamma to be experienced in the human world, kamma to be experienced in the world of the devas. This is called the diversity in kamma.

"And what is the result of kamma? The result of kamma is of three sorts, I tell you: that which arises right here & now, that which arises later [in this lifetime], and that which arises following that. This is called the result of kamma.

"And what is the cessation of kamma? From the cessation of contact is the cessation of kamma; and just this noble eightfold path — right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration — is the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma.

"Now when a disciple of the noble ones discerns kamma in this way, the cause by which kamma comes into play in this way, the diversity of kamma in this way, the result of kamma in this way, the cessation of kamma in this way, & the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma in this way, then he discerns this penetrative holy life as the cessation of kamma.

"'Kamma should be known. The cause by which kamma comes into play... The diversity in kamma... The result of kamma... The cessation of kamma... The path of practice for the cessation of kamma should be known.' Thus it has been said, and in reference to this was it said.​
If kamma is intention, then we are not punished for our "sins," rather, we are punished by our "sins." See the excerpt from Dhammapada 1:1-6 I posted earlier in post #29. Our thoughts and our actions affect our state of mind--unskillful intentions, thoughts and actions build mental patterns (kamma) that can cause us anguish. Ending the habits that lead to mental anguish in the here and now is what Buddhism is all about.
 
Last edited:

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
But does this cause us pain in the afterlife,can any buddhist believe that no one is hurt after death?
It certainly causes pain in the here & now within our minds. As for the question regarding afterlife/rebirth, this is how Buddhism deals with it:
Kalama Sutta
The Four Solaces

17. "The disciple of the Noble Ones, Kalamas, who has such a hate-free mind, such a malice-free mind, such an undefiled mind, and such a purified mind, is one by whom four solaces are found here and now.

"'Suppose there is a hereafter and there is a fruit, result, of deeds done well or ill. Then it is possible that at the dissolution of the body after death, I shall arise in the heavenly world, which is possessed of the state of bliss.' This is the first solace found by him.

"'Suppose there is no hereafter and there is no fruit, no result, of deeds done well or ill. Yet in this world, here and now, free from hatred, free from malice, safe and sound, and happy, I keep myself.' This is the second solace found by him.

"'Suppose evil (results) befall an evil-doer. I, however, think of doing evil to no one. Then, how can ill (results) affect me who do no evil deed?' This is the third solace found by him.

"'Suppose evil (results) do not befall an evil-doer. Then I see myself purified in any case.' This is the fourth solace found by him.​

The eightfold path is designed to purify the mind/consciousness. It can be experienced in the here & now. If consciousness continues after death, then the good habits established within the consciousness would continue on within the consciousness. If consciousness does not continue after death, then we can still be purified and of sound mind during this lifetime, and lead a good and happy life. :)
 

bp789

Member
May I ask why exactly you are so concerned with the idea of hell? I've noticed that you've created multiple topics in different parts of the forum about hell. Many people that practice Dharmic religions simply don't believe in a torturing or painful hell and aren't concerned with it.
 
Last edited:

willy1590

Member
Can I also ask if any buddhists believe that if we don't achieve Nirvana,we just get rebirth over and over,no hell,because hell is being put back here on earth?
 

DreadFish

Cosmic Vagabond
Can I also ask if any buddhists believe that if we don't achieve Nirvana,we just get rebirth over and over,no hell,because hell is being put back here on earth?

Somehow, I feel like you aren't reading the content of people's posts fully.
 
Top