• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do You Identify as a Feminist?

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Definition of feminism | Dictionary.com
Excerpted....
the doctrine advocating social, political, and all
other rights of women equal to those of men.

I notice that in the movement(s), it's about
Improving female rights when less than male's,
but not improving male rights when less than women's.
This is not to say that feminists are hostile to improving
men's rights. While some are, there is primarily less
interest to pursue improving men's rights & disparities,
eg, military draft, government assistance, earlier death,
child custody, affirmative action, sexual assault,
presumption of innocence, legal due process.

I favor egalitarianism, which is about more than just
female or male rights. But if someone wants to focus
upon just female or just male rights, that's fine with me.
One can't spread one's interest & efforts everywhere.
Just don't work against the rights of others.

So "feminist" doesn't fit me, despite my having scored
highly on tests to determine if one is a feminist.

I feel like this is pretty close to my own view. I support improving the rights of females, but also feel like some of the problems males face are rooted in similar problems to the ones females face.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I'm all for woman's rights and equality of the sexes so that makes me a feminist.

Not a radical feminist, not a socialist feminist, just a basic run of the mill feminist
I think that sort of describes me, too. But I feel that way about everybody -- so long as one is doing no (intentional) harm, I believe in universality of rights equality (at least of opportunity, though nobody can guarantee equality of outcomes, no even the means of opportunity) for everyone.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
1) What does "feminism" mean to you?

2) Do you identify as a feminist? Why or why not?
I have had several female bosses on jobs. I work with many female employees. There are some challenges such as mutual attraction and crushes and sexual tension. Most of my coworkers are women. It takes some effort not to let it affect me, and sometimes it does affect me. Sometimes it is also embarrassing. It confuses many people, and it can cause problems when men and women work alongside one another. It is not impossible, and it is not unworkable. We can work together. We ignore sex and gender as much as possible. We do not comment upon sexual differences, tell someone they are handsome or pretty, etc.

I believe that co-ed work is still experimental. We are still discovering how best to let men and women work together. There are many differences, and it is not always easy. There are worries as well as civil liabilities to consider. One of the problems is that there is no clear protocol for what to do if you are interested in someone. This means that there are civil liabilities to consider if you flirt. You could fired or sued. You could also be fired or sued if you do not flirt, or you could be considered unfriendly or unintelligent.

There are some problems that have not been resolved, yet. I think it is a worthwhile experiment, and I think that men and women will continue to work together. I think that things will improve as we discover the most stable ways of making this a good situation. It is certainly better than it was in the 1950's and 1960's.

************
Feminism in the 1500's to 1700's meant 1 man and 1 wife, and the wife was a person not property. This was a serious improvement over some previous arrangements. At this time the term 'Feminism' had not yet been coined; but the idea of improving life for women has always been around. They have always had a more difficult time due to their health needs, smaller bodies, shorter lifespans and difficult child-rearing burdens.

In more recent centuries women suffrage became a public issue. Many women desired to have the vote.

More recently women wanted to have full access to jobs like men. This is 1970's feminism. We are still working out the details. I am a feminist according to this. I already believe women should vote, and I believe they should have access to jobs.

More recently than that there are '3rd Wave' feminists, and they employ a jargon that is impenetrable without heavy reading. Many opponents of 3rd Wave believe it is a cynical view of the world and a reworked form of Marxism, postmodernist, believing that all things must be completely rethought. Many 3rd Wave feminists deny that physical biology is the reason that there are men and women, and they say instead that male and female are social constructs. This is very difficult to take seriously. I certainly don't feel like these are social constructs, so I think that the idea of 3rd Wave must be to provoke further discussion. I don't see how they could actually believe that male and female have no biological meaning. Politically, though, there seems to be a political attempt to disenfranchise male and female differences. I think that this political force has resulted in a counter-movement to 3rd Wave.
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
More recently than that there are '3rd Wave' feminists, and they employ a jargon that is impenetrable without heavy reading. Many opponents of 3rd Wave believe it is a cynical view of the world and a reworked form of Marxism, postmodernist, believing that all things must be completely rethought. Many 3rd Wave feminists deny that physical biology is the reason that there are men and women, and they say instead that male and female are social constructs. This is very difficult to take seriously. I certainly don't feel like these are social constructs, so I think that the idea of 3rd Wave must be to provoke further discussion. I don't see how they could actually believe that male and female have no biological meaning. Politically, though, there seems to be a political attempt to disenfranchise male and female differences. I think that this political force has resulted in a counter-movement to 3rd Wave.

There are two points that I think are worth highlighting here:
I personally haven't read enough about third-wave feminism, so I identify as a feminist without reference to any specific wave thereof.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
I don’t identify as feminist, no. As a man I’d feel a bit cringe labelling myself that way; like I find middle class white people wearing BLM badges a bit cringe.

I do believe in equal rights and justice for all; and that all human beings have equal value in the eyes of God.

Now, where’s my blooming dinner?
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
I don’t identify as feminist, no. As a man I’d feel a bit cringe labelling myself that way; like I find middle class white people wearing BLM badges a bit cringe.

I do believe in equal rights and justice for all; and that all human beings have equal value in the eyes of God.

Now, where’s my blooming dinner?

I also tend to avoid going out of my way to label myself a feminist not because of any disagreement with feminist ideals but because I know that loudly self-identifying as such could come across as insincere or fishing for compliments. I try to let my actions and positions do the talking instead.
 

JustGeorge

Imperfect
Staff member
Premium Member
Dinner is in the dog

When I was about 9-10ish, my mom wasn't feeling well, and asked my dad to make dinner. He said "there are four 'women' in this house(my mother, me, my kindergarten aged sister, and my infant sister); I'm not making any dinner."

My mom told us to get our coats. Us 'women' had dinner at an upscale restaurant, and dad stayed home and had canned soup. Not another word was said.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I have had several female bosses on jobs. I work with many female employees. There are some challenges such as mutual attraction and crushes and sexual tension. Most of my coworkers are women. It takes some effort not to let it affect me, and sometimes it does affect me. Sometimes it is also embarrassing. It confuses many people, and it can cause problems when men and women work alongside one another. It is not impossible, and it is not unworkable. We can work together. We ignore sex and gender as much as possible. We do not comment upon sexual differences, tell someone they are handsome or pretty, etc.
Have you considered that not everybody is heterosexual? As a gay man (and therefore a gay worker, leader, manager, director and executive), I've worked with people to whom I was very attracted indeed.

Now, I admit that there was another bar to my just blurting out, "Hey, gorgeous, wanna get it on?" than perhaps straight people feel. But I assure you, looked at from that perspective, you might see that it's not really so hard to quash inappropriate impulses.
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
1) What does "feminism" mean to you?
I have an article I wrote about it here:
What is Feminism, and how does it relate to Animus Individuation?
Basically, feminism is bringing the cultural nomos (dubbed The Patriarchy by feminists) into consciousness and critically examining it.
2) Do you identify as a feminist? Why or why not?
Yes. Being of the Left-Hand Path persuasion, I am all for critiquing the cultural nomos, whether it be through a feminist lens or otherwise.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Have you considered that not everybody is heterosexual? As a gay man (and therefore a gay worker, leader, manager, director and executive), I've worked with people to whom I was very attracted indeed.

Now, I admit that there was another bar to my just blurting out, "Hey, gorgeous, wanna get it on?" than perhaps straight people feel. But I assure you, looked at from that perspective, you might see that it's not really so hard to quash inappropriate impulses.
No, you're right...unless you're alone. In my case I find myself experiencing a gravity that is only in my mind and bends my attention. This distracts me. Its like floating in a cloud and is an extra daydream that keeps coming back. It costs me time at work. I'm supposed to treat everyone equally, but I just don't see everyone in the same way. I do quash inappropriate impulses when I am aware of them though.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
When I was about 9-10ish, my mom wasn't feeling well, and asked my dad to make dinner. He said "there are four 'women' in this house(my mother, me, my kindergarten aged sister, and my infant sister); I'm not making any dinner."

My mom told us to get our coats. Us 'women' had dinner at an upscale restaurant, and dad stayed home and had canned soup. Not another word was said.
I've learned how to make canned soup.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
No, you're right...unless you're alone. In my case I find myself experiencing a gravity that is only in my mind and bends my attention. This distracts me. Its like floating in a cloud and is an extra daydream that keeps coming back. It costs me time at work. I'm supposed to treat everyone equally, but I just don't see everyone in the same way. I do quash inappropriate impulses when I am aware of them though.
Trust me, I get it. In spades!

And I wasn't always 100% innocent! Thank goodness those who were the object of my transgressions were forgiving.
 
Top