wellwisher
Well-Known Member
1) What does "feminism" mean to you?
2) Do you identify as a feminist? Why or why not?
The answer to question 2 is no. This is how I explain question 1 and my answer of no for 2.
Men and Women differ by an entire chromosome; X or Y. They also differ by how the brain naturally wires itself. The male brain is more wired front to back, while the female brain is more wired side-to-side. These two affects of biology make men and women different, in and out.
The male brain is more designed to balance imagination; front of the brain, with visual reality; back of the brain. Women are more design for verbal/language needs and often better balance thought and feelings; side-by-side audio cortex. Male and female are designed to be complementary; team is more than the sum of its parts. This is based on science.
Males are more visually oriented; visual wiring, and women are more verbal/language based; verbal wiring.This why women still use makeup to appeal to the male's visual strengths even if they deny it. While males still think they need a good line of bull for some extra verbal makeup. We instinctively pander to the strengths of each other, thereby showing our awareness of each others unique strengths.
If men want to understand natural women, who use both sides of the brain, they need to realize that in women thought and emotions can occur at the same time. They need to create a balances based on the moods and the thoughts. Different moods may require a different tact, so the two sides can balance. One day, one gesture is accepted, but not the next day, due to different feeling needing to be accommodated.
If women wish to better understand the natural male, they orientate with sight and imagination, which combine visual reality, with extrapolations; education and experience, in their imagination. It is less about feelings balancing thoughts, but more about visualization and extrapolation of visual data, that can lead outside the box; new trick.
These biological and neural differences make males and female different, but complementary. Women like talk for intimacy, more that do natural guys. Guys often prefer the eye candy, over the smart girl with a nice personality; visual more than verbal. Girls will lower their visual standard for a guy who makes them laugh; verbal.
I am not a feminist, since they try to force what is unnatural onto the males and will deny natural difference optimized for each sex, via biology and neural anatomy. You cannot force males to become half males, thereby lowering the natural male floor, so feminists can to appear to raise above. This is a relative reference illusion, since it is not based on innate. This is Eve eating the wrong fruit one more time. Relationships between male and female die faster than ever before, since unnatural does not make good glue.
I would prefer if women learned to be the best women they can be without, requiring males dumb down for an illusion. Male also need to be the best they can be, which will make them different. These ideals have a secondary affect, connected to male and females able to cross program each other, to fill in the full wiring; neural cross. Half men and half women are not optimized for this upgrade, for both.
Gender preference is an extension of trying to con/force men and women to become what is not natural for each sex. Feminization did this with the neural wiring dumb down and now the Left is trying to ignore DNA. They assume if you change the superficial aspects of biology; surgery, nobody can tell the difference and the inside will also change; new clothes can make you feel pretty. This is more like an actor playing a better role with better costumes. Drag queens are over actors.
Gender choice is really about acting, until you condition yourself to become a certain type cast. It is sort of an induction from mass media and the idol worship of the actors of Hollywood. YouTube is about being on stage or filming the stage. Gender started small; he/she and she/he, but there become too many type casts, for too few roles, so the Lefty union expanded the roles for more jobs.
As an example, say I was planning a costume party. I tell all the guests, who enjoy surprises, they need to dress up in a gender role. The twist is these pronoun roles will be picked out of a hat, this weekend. Nobody knows who will be what, until after the drawing. Once we all know, we will all have one month to get our characters refined with gestures, talk and costume. Any trained actor can play any role; will and choice. Those best at acting, will more than likely be most convincing.
Instead, say we had a full year to refine these characters, through daily usage and better and better costumes; include surgery, some will look even more real all the way to type cast. They may even be able to get a part in Hollywood, playing this role, since acting is about playing a character on YouTube, TikTok or Hollywood.
I am not sure if the feminists should be pushing this, since being type cast, as a young child can limit the future of the young people. You can force then to practice any role with peer pressure. But this can be hard to play a new role, or be yourself, when life takes a turn, and you are still seen as the old role.
Has anyone gone to college, where you become a new person and then go home for the holidays, still type cast as your mom's baby? They don't want to see the new you just yet. It is better to let children be true to instinct, early and encourage that. Play that role, refine it, and you will have the support of eons of evolution, biology and your best neural wiring; the real you.
Last edited: