Well, I'm sort of impressed. You finally kind of answered the question I asked from 4 pages back. I take that as "it would not be accurate".
Now, what makes you think that everyone who came into contact with the story of Jesus actually held it at the same level of importance? How confident can you be that everyone involved got his words right? I mean, the biggest and most important thing about Jesus was supposed to be his words right? His "message". If anyone didn't quote his words exactly as he spoke them then do they really carry the same meaning? Can it really be said that he said them at all? Stories and myths like this have a tendency to be embellished. Exaggerated. And sometimes they are communicated by someone who did not truly understand what was originally meant, so they try to explain them as they understood it. Which might not be what was intended at all. Not to even mention the clear and great possibility that the man referred to did not exist or was not what he was taken to be or may have claimed to be. As legends and tales are passed on they seem to grow. The boulder moved becomes bigger and heavier. The enemies become greater in number. The acts become more fantastic and the claims become more phenomenal. When all is said and done, the whole story could be referring to some random carpenter who told people to be nice to each other or his dad would get mad and punish them. Or, much more likely, the bible is a book of mythologies and legends, much the same as any other collection of mythologies, that are meant to communicate and speak to the human condition and our place in this physical and spiritual world and how they interact.
All this said, it becomes quite clear that there are many possibilities to consider when it comes to the story of Christianity and the vast majority of them do not support it actually being based on real fact. This being the case, it is presumptuous and wrong to try to claim that it holds the only "truth" there is and to tell people that they should believe it. If someone believes it because their own experiences bring them to that path, then that is fine. But to insinuate that it is the only possible truth and that it is substantiated by fact is dishonest at best.