There's only the Rainbow Room, but that's private and mostly dead. It's not good for debates, either.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do you support a public LGBT Subforum?
- Thread starter Saint Frankenstein
- Start date
There's only the Rainbow Room, but that's private and mostly dead. It's not good for debates, either.
I don't really know, and I am not involved in the decision (at least so far), but let me tell you: if you want to make your case, it will help to actually allow people to vote against it... having two "yes" choices is fun and all, and the cause is worthy, but it really hurts the chances of the poll being taken seriously.
May I suggest that you could create a Site Feedback thread to talk about this idea? It may be that it will be created outright, or a new poll with a "No" option may be needed, or some third option might manifest itself.
Phil25
Active Member
Capitalist DIR got 23 Yes votes.
I would also suggest to create a thread in Site Feedback requesting for LGBT DIR. Thats what I did for Capitalist DIR and it worked for me.
Drolefille
PolyPanGeekGirl
Is debate actually allowed in a DIR? I thought it was not.
Well, it doesn't have to be a DIR. Just a subforum. I made this thread because I thought of it while posting in the Capitalist DIR poll thread.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Well, just as some people said, Capitalism could be discussed in Conservative DIRI would say LGBT stuff could be discussed in Liberal DIR.
Nonsense. Capitalism isn't exclusive to conservatism, nor is LGBT exclusive to liberalism.
Drolefille
PolyPanGeekGirl
See, that's all I'm suggesting is a discussion nor debate subforum. Although I'd lean toward discussion as most of the debates fit into politics or general more easily than discussion. I don't think it's necessary but if desired that's what I'd prefer. A DIR seems unneeded hence my opposition since that's the title of the thread.
Well, I can't edit my OP now.
Staff, replace "DIR" with "subforum" in the title, please.
dgirl1986
Big Queer Chesticles!
I figure if we can have a sexuality area we can have a gender indentity/transgender/transexual area as well.
Done!
Drolefille
PolyPanGeekGirl
I agree, even if it was a GSM area, that'd be fine. I still have some concerns about isolation/ghettoization of the topics, but nothing compels anyone to post there instead of in a broader forum so it's all good.
Phil25
Active Member
Ok, I voted Yes.
Bump. Come on, everyone.
Wirey
Fartist
Would there be pizza?
Yes. I 100% support an LGBT subforum.
Thruve
Sheppard for the Die Hard
Yes. I 100% support an LGBT subforum.
whats that gender symbol represent? Bisexual? or..
Gender neutral.
It means "gender-neutral".
Physically, I am male and look male. Socially I also go by male pronouns. However, spiritually, emotionally, and mentally I don't really feel male or female. I'm also gender-neutral in that I personally don't feel like I can really fit into stereotypically male gender roles.