muhammad_isa
Veteran Member
OK .. but that is not a definition of free-will, it is a treatise .. a discussion.As far as the variations in the views of Free Will I refer to"
..and I see "While this question may be related to philosophy or occur in a philosophical context, the question itself doesn't seem to be about philosophy, and is therefore not a good fit for our site."In terms of different views of Limited Free WilI refer to the following:
First source: What is “limited free will”?
..which is what I was saying .. your discussion is about psychology .. the reasons why we choose what we choose.
Who has told you that they think that we have complete control over our actions?Theistic view of Limited Free Will
Limited free will does not require the agent to have full and complete power over their actions. It just requires "the power to be the ultimate creator and sustainer of some of one's own ends or purposes."
Not me, that's for sure.
..which is why it's not good to become angry .. because we are liable to lose control (grrr)
Nonsense .. I don't believe that you can read my mind !. . . but it is true your ancient tribal religious agenda determines your view of Free Will..
It's no more than an assumption .. a bad one at that.
No .. it is not about ignorance .. I merely have a different opinion to you...your view toward the sciences of evolution reflect an intentional ignorance of science..
You embrace the theory of evolution, and its non-proven extensions in its entirety.
..whereas I do not. Why should I? Why should I believe in something that cannot be proven to be true?
Just because the core of evolutionary theory is provable, and is widely accepted as fact, doesn't mean
that every theory asscociated with it (there are 100's) are similarly provable fact.
This is what I see time and again .. people flinging mud at each other about T of E .. you're a science nutter, or you're an ignorant believer in fairy tales.
You are both as bad as one another. Meaningless nonsense.
One has to SPECIFY what they are referring to .. T of E, could be referring to many things.
Sorry no .. see above.Yes the rejection of the sciences of evolution represents the rejection of science
Grouping all into one is deceit !
..whether it is wilful or not, I wouldn't know .. but feel sure in some cases, it is !
Don't be so dramatic., because it rejects the science of every major academic institution and university in the world.
Science is not the only academic pursuit in said universities, in any case.
I reject your portrayal of science. I reject the deceit of "all or nothing".YES! You reject contemporary science.