No. It's all a conspiracy.
People rightly claim things as fact.
..and then they add things and insist they are also facts, because that's what "we are told by science".
Science relied on physical evidence that are not only testable, but that verify strong scientific models and refute weak models.
(Note that “model” can either be a new “hypothesis” or a current “scientific theory”. If there are enough evidence, current theory be updated/modified, expanded, or even replaced by better tested alternative.)
The quantities of evidence provide the basis of empirical data, and depending if it support model or refute model. The evidence and data are what provide model, level of objectivity.
What you’ve said below in your post:
Sorry .. I don't buy it. I think for myself.
I honestly don't care what you think.
I care what G-d thinks.
I'm fairly sure G-d won't mind if I say I don't know what happened
millions of years ago
...this is allowing your personal preference and personal belief to dictate your subjective decision to accept or reject a model, not based on the evidence. That’s your “bias” talking here.
Science are based on evidence. Evidence are fact, and that’s what determine the validity of scientific theories, not personal beliefs or preferences.
And you don’t know what god think. No one knows.
Scriptures are not “god”. God isn’t made of papers, parchment or vellum. And scriptures aren’t science treatises - not the Jewish Torah, not the Christian gospels or not your Islamic Qur’an.
All of them, every single ones of them, abrahamic and pagan texts were written by humans, based on hearsay, and often embellished with myths and fables.
To think god wrote any of these scriptures, are false and pretentious claims. And revering as if they were holy, and treating these man-made texts as if they were infallible and inerrant like god, is a form of idolatry.
There are no scientific merits in any religious texts.
In the Qur’an, claiming that jinns are beings made of smokeless fire, are examples of false belief in myth. The claim that King Solomon understand the languages of birds and ants, are nothing more than fable or children fairytale. And the claim that Adam was created from clay and water, is just more storytelling.
There are no science in any of these 3 claims by Muhammad. And if you think god is the true author of the Qur’an, then god is author of myths, fables and fairytale. So I don’t think god was author of your Qur’an.
The Qur’an contain no knowledge of biology, not of humans, animals or plants, no knowledge of DNA and genetics.
So for you to reject modern biology, you care what your god think on the basis of the Qur’an, then you certainly don’t understand biology.
Good luck with remaining blissfully ignorant, while hiding behind scriptures.
