Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
Choosing not to apply reason to something doesn't necessarily mean one cannot apply reason - it simply means they are not in that case.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I believe faith distorts a person's sense of reality. People of faith are unable to use their reason to full effect. We see this occuring all the time. I myself experienced it when I had faith. My own journey as a Christian became more and more troubled towards the end, as I tried to use my reason to understand the countless theological, ethical, scientific and philosophical problems that my religion presented. Unfortunately, change does not come easy. Especially when there is the threat of eternal torture. Even thinking about the various problems Christianity presents seemed dangerous to me, as I thought I might be angering god. Religions that promote the concept of eternal torture are evil. Their God is a cruel psychopath. I hope these people will realize that their master is an evil tormenter, and that they have alligned themselves with the side of darkness and become blind followers of an evil being they imagine exists.
You could be right. Yet almost everyone is living on faith to a certain extent. You don't verify scientifically before calling your parents daddy and mom, do you?!
nonetheless, to classify a person as a daddy or a mom you judge that by what you empirically experience of them. so really, if we are speaking of love, in the metaphysical sense, don't we know we are loved by what we have been shown or proven by actions?
What empirical evidence you got at hand that I am a human to start answering my post?
You swallow by faith that your mom and daddy are actually your mom and daddy, yet sometimes this is subject to error and a DNA test is thus needed, and in this case (that the DNA test give a negative) your theory of "empirically..." is a joke.
because your ability to improvise
i guess it's what your definition of what mom and dad mean
if you say it's a matter of DNA...well that can be proven, right? if you say in the metaphysical sense that can be proven as well by how you experience them...they are real. parental love is real by how they show it to you which is your proof that mommy and daddy love you...now if we are talking about god, where is the empirical evidence god loves you? as far as i'm concerned, god is indifferent, therefore a loving god does not exist.
Well I think you should distinguish "faith" from Christianity. Faith could mean one's religion, or it could also mean the biblical definition, where God says to have faith. With biblical faith, yes, I think it distorts a person's sense of reality. But I don't think that is the case with religion itself.
I understand this view is rather harsh
but so is ignorance, a mind is a terrible thing to waist.
Quite so. Arrogance within ignorance is even worse.
They are the same thing. Neither compromises one's ability to reason. The person can do that, but faith does not. Actually, having faith can enhance your ability to reason for the simple fact that it allows you to see a larger picture. The more information that you have, the better your reasonings will be.
then go out and teach! the world so people are not so ignorant.
take care of your own faiths problems with YEC that are in la la land
then start on the ignorant who do not understand evolution because of there religious blinders
but is that information based on subjective truth?
hey strike, it's been a while
If you do faith correctly and end up with a different result, I'd like to hear all about it. Thinking that faith doesn't lead to this outcome is like saying eating food won't get you less hungry.
what do you mean by correctly?
if one has a certain point of view about something how would the outcome be different from what they expected?
isn't changing your perspective the best way to get the most accurate information?
My ability to reason is why I have faith.
Religion is about getting the courage to actually do the dropping. The rest happens automatically.
How do you teach something that can only be learned? If you've got an answer to that, I'd love to hear it.
YEC?
Those who have eyes to see but do not see are blind by their own choice. Their blinders are their own. No one can remove them for them.