• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does God welcome everyone into heaven?

Good-Ole-Rebel

*banned*
I will try to explain this as best I can. First, the gospels are not authored so it is not known if the disciples actually wrote the gospels, and second, even if some of the disciples wrote them that is not proof that the stories are true.

You are talking as if the resurrection stories are the entire Bible, but they are only part of the Bible.
The Bible is about more than the resurrection. Everything leading up to the resurrection was the mission of Jesus but I believe that Jesus died on the cross and His spirit/soul was raised to heaven. At that time Jesus said "It's finished." That means that Jesus' mission on earth was finished, but then later men wrote stories and tried to bring Jesus back to life, and then Christians came to believe Jesus ascended into the sky, and will return the way He left, all because of two verses (Acts 1:10-11) that were misinterpreted.

As a Christian,the Bible is 'authored'. It's Author is God. Men were used to write the Words of God. Again, you don't have to believe that either, but that is the testimony of the Bible. In many books of the Bible, the human writer is known. In many, it is not, or it is uncertain. That doesn't take away the testimony of the Bible. Whether one of the 12 disciples is the human writer or not, matters not.

No, I'm talking as one who believes the Bible, of which the Gospels are part of. Yes, the Bible is about more than resurrection, and I believe all it says about that also.

Why do you believe Jesus died on the Cross? It is just a story in the Gospels. Written, as you say, by unknown writers. See, you don't believe the Bible. You believe what you want and the rest is just stories.

First of all, you said the Bible does not say God brings back people from a state of decomposition, resurrection of the body. I showed you that you were wrong. The Bible does say and teach that. Next, you say, but you don't believe those verses of the Bible because that is just stories made up by man. But then you believe parts of those stories, made up by men, that you want to.

You are not Christian, so no need for you to believe the Bible. But the inconsistency of your position should be obvious to you, though I'm sure you will deny it. In other words, don't say you believe the Bible. Say you only believe parts of what is written in the Bible. But then you're left with the glaring problem of how do you justify that? Why believe the story of the Cross but not the resurrection when they are written by the same writers?

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

cataway

Well-Known Member
Zephaniah 1 New International Version (NIV)
1 The word of the Lord that came to Zephaniah son of Cushi, the son of Gedaliah, the son of Amariah, the son of Hezekiah, during the reign of Josiah son of Amon king of Judah:






Since Zephaniah apparently prophesied during the early part of King Josiah’s reign, which began in 659 B.C.E., those prophetic words found a fulfillment in the desolation of Judah and her capital city, Jerusalem, at Babylonian hands in 607 B.C.E. At that time, there was a ‘finishing off’ of wicked ones in Judah.
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member

Since Zephaniah apparently prophesied during the early part of King Josiah’s reign, which began in 659 B.C.E., those prophetic words found a fulfillment in the desolation of Judah and her capital city, Jerusalem, at Babylonian hands in 607 B.C.E. At that time, there was a ‘finishing off’ of wicked ones in Judah.

giphy.gif


It doesn't change the fact that God said:

I will sweep away everything
from the face of the earth,”
declares the Lord.

“I will sweep away both man and beast;
I will sweep away the birds in the sky
and the fish in the sea—
and the idols that cause the wicked to stumble.”

“When I destroy all mankind
on the face of the earth,”
declares the Lord,

source.gif
 

cataway

Well-Known Member

that prophecy ,it applied to that time .only to that time .
there is a similar prophecy that does apply to false religion . that is a future event . you should expect governments to make a move against religion . to remove it .
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member
that prophecy ,it applied to that time .only to that time .
there is a similar prophecy that does apply to false religion . that is a future event . you should expect governments to make a move against religion . to remove it .

giphy.gif


Deuteronomy 4:2 New American Standard Bible (NASB)
You shall not add to the word which I am commanding you, nor take away from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you.

Deuteronomy 12:32 New American Standard Bible (NASB)
“Whatever I command you, you shall be careful to do; you shall not add to nor take away from it.

Revelation 22:18-19 New International Version (NIV)
I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll.

giphy.gif
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
If you are aware that the signs are fulfilled and are being fulfilled then why in God's goodness would you still recognize another Messiah who was a polygamist and a pedophile?
Polygamy was the accepted norm in Muslim culture and it was within the law.
Baha'u'llah was not a pedophile and neither was Muhammad.

I accept Baha'u'llah because he fulfilled all the prophecies, simple as that.
William Sears, Thief in the Night

If you want to deny that that's your choice, but you will never be able to prove that He did not fulfill all those prophecies because He did.


 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
As a Christian,the Bible is 'authored'. It's Author is God. Men were used to write the Words of God. Again, you don't have to believe that either, but that is the testimony of the Bible. In many books of the Bible, the human writer is known. In many, it is not, or it is uncertain. That doesn't take away the testimony of the Bible. Whether one of the 12 disciples is the human writer or not, matters not.
Fair enough. As a Baha'i, I also believe that the Bible is the Word of God, because that is what my religion teaches. Addressing some Muslims who claimed that the Bible had been corrupted, Baha’u’llah wrote that the Bible is God's holy Book, His most great testimony among His creatures:

“We have also heard a number of the foolish of the earth assert that the genuine text of the heavenly Gospel doth not exist amongst the Christians, that it hath ascended unto heaven. How grievously they have erred! How oblivious of the fact that such a statement imputeth the gravest injustice and tyranny to a gracious and loving Providence! How could God, when once the Day-star of the beauty of Jesus had disappeared from the sight of His people, and ascended unto the fourth heaven, cause His holy Book, His most great testimony amongst His creatures, to disappear also?” The Kitáb-i-Íqán, p. 89
No, I'm talking as one who believes the Bible, of which the Gospels are part of. Yes, the Bible is about more than resurrection, and I believe all it says about that also.

Why do you believe Jesus died on the Cross? It is just a story in the Gospels. Written, as you say, by unknown writers. See, you don't believe the Bible. You believe what you want and the rest is just stories.
I believe in the cross sacrifice because it is a teaching of my religion. Baha'u'llah wrote:

“Know thou that when the Son of Man yielded up His breath to God, the whole creation wept with a great weeping. By sacrificing Himself, however, a fresh capacity was infused into all created things...... Through Him, the unchaste and wayward were healed. Through His power, born of Almighty God, the eyes of the blind were opened, and the soul of the sinner sanctified.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 85-86


I do not believe that Jesus rose bodily because I believe that those stories have another meaning, as follows:

23: THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST
First of all, you said the Bible does not say God brings back people from a state of decomposition, resurrection of the body. I showed you that you were wrong. The Bible does say and teach that. Next, you say, but you don't believe those verses of the Bible because that is just stories made up by man. But then you believe parts of those stories, made up by men, that you want to
The Bible does not say that Jesus was brought back from a state of decomposition. The gospel stories about that resurrection have so-many contradictions that this alone should tell you they are just stories men told and not real events. I mean how can they all be true when they contradict each other? This is simple logic.
You are not Christian, so no need for you to believe the Bible. But the inconsistency of your position should be obvious to you, though I'm sure you will deny it. In other words, don't say you believe the Bible. Say you only believe parts of what is written in the Bible. But then you're left with the glaring problem of how do you justify that? Why believe the story of the Cross but not the resurrection when they are written by the same writers?
I just explained why I believe that Jesus died on the cross, because my religion teaches that. I believe in the rest of the Bible, but I do not believe all the events that were depicted are 'literal events'; rather I believe that they have symbolic meanings and I think that was the intention of the authors. I am not alone in believing this way. many Christians also believe this way.
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

*banned*
Fair enough. As a Baha'i, I also believe that the Bible is the Word of God, because that is what my religion teaches. Addressing some Muslims who claimed that the Bible had been corrupted, Baha’u’llah wrote that the Bible is God's holy Book, His most great testimony among His creatures:

“We have also heard a number of the foolish of the earth assert that the genuine text of the heavenly Gospel doth not exist amongst the Christians, that it hath ascended unto heaven. How grievously they have erred! How oblivious of the fact that such a statement imputeth the gravest injustice and tyranny to a gracious and loving Providence! How could God, when once the Day-star of the beauty of Jesus had disappeared from the sight of His people, and ascended unto the fourth heaven, cause His holy Book, His most great testimony amongst His creatures, to disappear also?” The Kitáb-i-Íqán, p. 89

I believe in the cross sacrifice because it is a teaching of my religion. Baha'u'llah wrote:

“Know thou that when the Son of Man yielded up His breath to God, the whole creation wept with a great weeping. By sacrificing Himself, however, a fresh capacity was infused into all created things...... Through Him, the unchaste and wayward were healed. Through His power, born of Almighty God, the eyes of the blind were opened, and the soul of the sinner sanctified.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 85-86


I do not believe that Jesus rose bodily because I believe that those stories have another meaning, as follows:

23: THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST
The Bible does not say that Jesus was brought back from a state of decomposition. The gospel stories about that resurrection have so-many contradictions that this alone should tell you they are just stories men told and not real events. I mean how can they all be true when they contradict each other? This is simple logic.

I just explained why I believe that Jesus died on the cross, because my religion teaches that. I believe in the rest of the Bible, but I do not believe all the events that were depicted are 'literal events'; rather I believe that they have symbolic meanings and I think that was the intention of the authors. I am not alone in believing this way. many Christians also believe this way.

The point in question is the resurrection. You said the Bible does not teach it. I have showed you in the Bible that it does. And it does, but you just say it is stories from man.

I don't mind you not believing what the Bible is saying. I mind you saying the Bible doesn't teach that when it does.

Why do you believe Jesus died on the Cross? Why isn't that just a story with another meaning? Are you the one who determines what is a 'story' and not real in the Bible? If not, who is the one that determines what is a story and not real in the Bible?

For some reason, probably as a safety net of sorts, you don't believe the Bible, yet you don't want to say it. Make no mistake here. You do not believe the Bible.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
The point in question is the resurrection. You said the Bible does not teach it. I have showed you in the Bible that it does. And it does, but you just say it is stories from man.

I don't mind you not believing what the Bible is saying. I mind you saying the Bible doesn't teach that when it does.
The stories in the Bible say Jesus rose from the grave. I have no real explanation for why those stories were written, but I do not believe them.
Why do you believe Jesus died on the Cross? Why isn't that just a story with another meaning?
I explained why I believe that. I believe it because my religion teaches it. Don't you understand the passage I posted?
Are you the one who determines what is a 'story' and not real in the Bible? If not, who is the one that determines what is a story and not real in the Bible?
No, I am not the one who determines that. Only God knows since God is the one who inspired the Bible writers. I just have an opinion, as you do, but you do not know either.
For some reason, probably as a safety net of sorts, you don't believe the Bible, yet you don't want to say it. Make no mistake here. You do not believe the Bible.
You are not the first Christians who has told me that and you won't be the last. If you mean I do not believe everything in the Bible literally happened as it was written, no, I do not believe that. Here is an official statements from my religion on the Bible:

From letters written on behalf of the Universal House of Justice:

In studying the Bible Bahá'ís must bear two principles in mind. The first is that many passages in Sacred Scriptures are intended to be taken metaphorically, not literally, and some of the paradoxes and apparent contradictions which appear are intended to indicate this. The second is the fact that the text of the early Scriptures, such as the Bible, is not wholly authentic.
(28 May 1984 to an individual believer)

The Bahá'ís believe that God's Revelation is under His care and protection and that the essence, or essential elements, of what His Manifestations intended to convey has been recorded and preserved in Their Holy Books. However, as the sayings of the ancient Prophets were written down some time later, we cannot categorically state, as we do in the case of the Writings of Bahá'u'lláh, that the words and phrases attributed to Them are Their exact words
(9 August 1984 to an individual believer)

The Bible: Extracts on the Old and New Testaments
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I don't assume they do. I never said that. I believe when people die there's a light at the end of a tunnel. Everyone goes into the light. And once you go into the light, you experience God's infinite beauty which is pure bliss.

After we experience God our experience of self just stops. I believe there is no afterlife. Our soul just returns back to God from whence it originated. There is no judgment. This is nothing to be afraid of.

That sounds really boring, a moment of bliss and then poof, you are gone. That is how Christians view hell, compete extinction. That would be hell to me. I did not go through all the hell of this life just for one moment of bliss. That would be totally unjust if that is all we got from God for all our suffering in this world. I have a much better depiction of the afterlife than that, but you did not want to see the video, oh well. ;)

There is nothing to be afraid of because there is nothing. That is quite an extreme you are going to just to avoid a judgment, especially because there is no reason to even think that God will judge you harshly, if you have been a good person.
Wow! You really have this mapped out.
Yes, that is my day job, I am a cartographer. :)
You certainly know a lot about how God thinks.
I do not know how God thinks; I only know what God ‘wills’ for humans in every age.
This is exactly what love means. For you love means hate.
Everyone not going to heaven is not hate. It is justice.
Not getting being allowed through the gates of Heaven and being forced to experience Eternal damnation is worse than being raped!
Not for everyone, because some people do not want to go to heaven, they prefer hell. If they hate God, why would they want to be near to God? If they disbelieve in God, they might be neutral, in which case they might go to the waiting room between heaven and hell.

Who said anything about eternal damnation? Nothing is forever, except eternal life, which is a condition of the soul that is near to God.
I would not wish this on anyone! I think just wishing it or thinking it will happen to someone else will probably cause you to suffer here and now.
I do not wish it on anyone.
But you know. You know exactly what God's think where as I do not.
If you don’t know, how do you know that God welcomes everyone into heaven?
So we are equal which is what I've been saying the whole time.
I do not believe we are all equal in the sight of God, be we good or evil.
What I am saying is an omnipotent God would have no reason to judge anyone. An omnipotent God has no need or desire to judge anyone negatively.
How do you know that? You just said “You know exactly what God's think where as I do not.”
It's not the case if not enough people do not make it through the gates of Heaven God is going to die. God will be just fine no matter how pious of a life you think you are living.
That is true, it is no skin off God’s nose if people go to heaven or not
God has no reason to keep anyone out of Heaven.
The reason is that they do not deserve to go to heaven. There is no free ride. Heaven has to be earned.
This is pure delusional fantasy to think our omnipotent God would also share in your same immature emotions of hate.
This is your pure delusional fantasy to think I have any emotions of hate.
We all agree rape is wrong but it has nothing to do with God. I see no reason to think why an omnipotent God would care about anything especially carrying out what you think is justice in the afterlife.
It will be what God thinks is justice; it has nothing to do with what I think.
According to my beliefs, God cares about justice and it is very important to Him.

64: O OPPRESSORS ON EARTH! Withdraw your hands from tyranny, for I have pledged Myself not to forgive any man’s injustice. This is My covenant which I have irrevocably decreed in the preserved tablet and sealed with My seal. The Hidden Words of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 44
There's no reason for God to do anything. God has everything God needs. God has no limitations like the desire to have justice like you are imagining he does.
According to my beliefs, God cares about justice and it is a gift for humans, not a punishment.

2: O SON OF SPIRIT! The best beloved of all things in My sight is Justice; turn not away therefrom if thou desirest Me, and neglect it not that I may confide in thee. By its aid thou shalt see with thine own eyes and not through the eyes of others, and shalt know of thine own knowledge and not through the knowledge of thy neighbor. Ponder this in thy heart; how it behooveth thee to be. Verily justice is My gift to thee and the sign of My loving-kindness. Set it then before thine eyes. The Hidden Words of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 3-4
Raping someone is against the law. We have secular laws for a reason. If you want justice it will only comes in a secular court of law. If you want justice I would not assume it's going to come in the afterlife because this is what you want to hear from your bible..
It is not because I read it in the Bible; it is in other scriptures too.
If men crap in their own bed it's up to men to clean it up. Man is the measure of all things.
I agree. Man is responsible for his own actions.
You claim God will enforce justice. I think God will do nothing. I think just as in life, God will drop the ball on stopping unnecessary evil in favor of His long-term plan.
Great, a do-nothing God. :rolleyes:
So what do you think is God’s long-term plan?
Nobody knows what God is thinking.
If you do not know what God us thinking, why did you say the following? “I am saying is an omnipotent God would have no reason to judge anyone. An omnipotent God has no need or desire to judge anyone negatively.”
But my argument God has no needs or desires to be the way you want him to be is based on what being Omnipotent means.
God does not desire anything for Himself because God is fully self-sufficient and fully self-sustaining. However, God desires things for humans, and one of those desires is justice.
No, I am not saying they get a free pass. If you cause someone else to suffer you will experience suffering in your own life in equal proportion.
You might or you might not, in this life, but after you die you will experience the suffering you caused. You will reap what you sowed, and that is why everyone will not go to heaven.
I am saying God has no reason to be the way you want him to be. An omnipotent God is complete without any needs or desires. You are projecting your human attributes on God as if God is not omnipotent.
I do not want God to be any ‘way’; God is what God is. God has no needs or desires of His Own, but God desires justice for humans, among other things.
We have secular laws and courts of justice precisely because we do not trust to leave it to God.
I trust leaving it to God. So do many other people.
And even if someone is not brought to justice it doesn't matter. When you cause other people to suffer it will come back to bite you. What goes around comes around.
Sometimes it comes back to you in this world, sometimes it doesn’t, but it will surely come back to you on the afterlife.
This is not a discussion about what is evil and what is not evil. Stories on Discovery and Forensic Files does not support your opinion about God.
But scriptures do.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you but I have been swamped since I am also posting on another forum now. I saved this post and your other one in a Word document so I would not forget, not that I would forget you, my favorite atheist. :D
But then that should answer your original question of whether or not everyone gets into heaven. If God does not demand anything from us, then everyone ought to get there.
The reason everyone does not get to heaven is because even though God does not make any demands on us, there are requirements; humans are the ones who decide if we get to heaven or not, and we do so by our own faith and conduct.
Furthermore if we are created in his image, then the murderer, the rapist and child molestor is equally made in his image. If that was not in his image, then were does it come from? How is it even possible for a person to murder in the first place?
That is true, we were all created in God’s image, but after we were created we had to choose between good and evil, because we have free will. It is possible for a person to commit murder because he has free will so he can choose between good and evil. God gave us free will because God wanted us to be able to choose between good and evil because God wanted us to become what we will become by choosing to become who we become. It is all about free will.

70: FREE WILL
Sure he could, even if we run with the idea that God himself can't come here, have no clue why that limitation is there, since he can do anything.
God cannot come to earth and materialize because God is Spirit. The way God shows up on Earth is by sending His Manifestations (Messengers) who are perfect mirror images of God who appear in the flesh. But the Essence of God is spirit and that spirit does not become flesh, only the attributes of God are manifested in the flesh.
But even if the messengers were the only way. He could fill the Earth with intelligent messengers which spoke sense and which could convince or enlight the rest of us. For some reason there is only one messenger at the time, and with what 2000 years apart? Or when is the next messenger suppose to replace Baha'u'llah?
There is only one Messenger sent every 500-1000 years because only one is necessary to get the job done that God wants to get done. There could be another Messenger 1000 years from when Baha’u’llah declared His mission, but no sooner. That will epend upon what God deems necessary for humanity.
From a logical point of view, the reason there can't be any other messengers, is the because it would be confusing, because they are humans and not send from God and therefore their ideas varies and have different ideas etc. Which would conflict with each other, exactly what you would expect from humans.
You are right that there cannot be more than one Messenger of God sent at a time, because it would be confusing if they contradicted each other, but also it is not necessary to have more than one at a time.
If they were send by God, he could send 10000 here and have them all receive the same information. He could make them answer questions about how the Universe works, have them perform miracles, like going around and healing the corona sick simply by putting their hand on them.
Why would God do that? Why do we need more than one Messenger if that Messenger receives and relays to us everything God wants us to know at that time in history? God could do any of what you said but the reason he doesn’t do it is because He does not want to do it because we do not need the answers to those questions and we do not need miracles since we have been given a brain to figure things out and heal our own sick.
It is just not consistent in regards to what God is suppose to be able to do. And if he is not interested in interacting with us, besides one person every X number of thousand years, which doesn't manage to really convince people, then what is the point of God anyway?
The first thing that you and many atheists do not understand is that just because God CAN do anything that does not mean God DOES do everything God CAN do. The second thing is that God only DOES what God chooses to do, and that will never be what humans want God to do unless that aligns with what God wants for humans.

You are right that is what happens with God’s Messengers but that is not God’s fault or the Messengers’ fault, it happens because of human free will decisions and actions. But this is only what has happened in the past and what is happening now; in the future it will not be the case because eventually everyone will recognize Baha’u’llah and that will be a game changer.
If that is God's way of interacting with humans, he is simply not needed. Im sorry to say it. We have each other and have already proven that we can do amazing things when we work together.
I understand your sentiments about God and I would feel the same way were it not for Baha’u’llah. No, God is not needed to do anything except sending Messengers, and then it is up to humans to follow the messages, and whether the bulk of humanity recognize the Messenger or not, His message is followed. For example, we can see the message that Baha’u’llah delivered 150 years ago – the unity of mankind – coming to fruition right now, because of this pandemic. You see, whatever God wills always comes to pass, and since the Messengers represent God’s will, their will is always followed.
But you do believe in Jesus as a messenger and that he was crucified? So if you were God and you saw that his messenger, his greatest hope for helping humanity and give us guidance, is being killed. And for the most part, none really listened to him……… And finally the real one comes along, not from Jesus really, but from a new messenger in form of Baha'u'llah. Which strangely enough take parts from both Christianity and Islam, which seems very weird, taking into account, that its obvious that Bahais clearly think that they are wrong about so many things.
Jesus had already completed His mission before he was crucified, and being crucified was part of His mission. Sure, nobody back then listened to Jesus just like not many people are now listening tom Baha’u’llah, but eventually the message of Jesus took hold and the same will happen with Baha’u’llah.

God did not make a mistake, Jesus and Muhammad did not make mistakes. Only humans made mistakes and that is why the religions that were founded by the Messengers went awry over time. Baha’is only believe that Muslims and Christians are wrong about some things because they veered way from what their scriptures really taught and they misinterpreted some of them.
So again, its about consistency. Is that really what an all powerful God is capable of? Is that really the strategy such being would use... to me it makes so little sense, that is hard for me to express it.
C:\Users\Home\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image001.gif
Again, it is not about capability, it is about what God chooses to do, and since God is All-Knowing and All-Wise God has to know the best strategy. I cannot make it make sense to you, I can only explain it. You say it is not working well but from my perspective as a Baha’i, everything is going as God willed. What you cannot see I can see because I believe I know what God’s will is and I see it unfolding before my very eyes.
Why would God have hope?
God has hope because God knows what humans are capable of, what they can be, if they turn to their spiritual nature. I have seen innumerable examples of this on TV since this pandemic hit. Just last night I saw a Seattle bus driver who is putting his own life on the line every day by continuing to take passengers, and then of course we all know about the valiant doctors and nurses and first responders who put their lives on the line every day to save other lives. Of course God has hope, God hopes others will learn by their example and that eventually this world can be transformed into a better place, a New Race of Men, as envisioned by Baha’u’llah.
Think about it, why do a person need hope in the first place? The only reason we have hope in things, is because we are uncertain about how something will play out……… So God having hope, simply means that he have no clue what is going on. He started something and now he have lost control and just hope that it will turn out good. Not only, does that not really suit a God, but also it makes him flawed, not all powerful and incompetent in regards to what you would expect from him.
You are a quick study Nimos. ;) I do not mean God has hope in a human sense of hoping, because God already knows how everything will turn out. What I really meat is that God has confidences in humans because God knows what we are capable of becoming, since we were made in His image and we have a spiritual nature.
If this is covered by free will, it only means that God is playing a very dangerous game with human lives, Because we know, and he knows that humans kill each other, sometimes over stupid things, sometimes out of desperation, greed, you name it. Yet this is considered more good, than us not having free will, despite us not being able to tell the difference anyway. You see the issue here?
I do understand what you are getting at. However there is really no way around humans having free will because otherwise we could not make any choices, either good or bad. But there are rewards and punishments in this world and in the next for both good and bad behavior and that is what makes it just and fair for God to create it this way: “The Great Being saith: The structure of world stability and order hath been reared upon, and will continue to be sustained by, the twin pillars of reward and punishment…” Gleanings, p. 219
Him throwing an extremely ineffective pill, in the form of a messenger to us once every few thousand years, is indescribable in regards to how poor a solution that is.
But this solution has worked for most people, and that is why most people are good people, not rapists and murderers.
And again as I said in the other posts, If I have to go with the idea that God exists, he simply can't be incompetent. It just wont work with an all powerful God. There need to be consistency in what we observe and experience, and what a God can and chooses to do. Which is why I said that I would throw out all religious texts we know of.
Of course if God exists, God cannot be incompetent. Why would you throw out all religious texts?
Because you can't claim that God is all good, when we don't see that in the world.
How can you expect to see that in the world if people are not good, and if people are not good who is to blame for that?
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member
Polygamy was the accepted norm in Muslim culture and it was within the law.
Baha'u'llah was not a pedophile and neither was Muhammad.

I accept Baha'u'llah because he fulfilled all the prophecies, simple as that.
William Sears, Thief in the Night

If you want to deny that that's your choice, but you will never be able to prove that He did not fulfill all those prophecies because He did.

giphy.gif


It was so good back then and now it is called statutory rape.

1 Kings 11 New International Version (NIV)
King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh’s daughter—Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians and Hittites. They were from nations about which the Lord had told the Israelites, “You must not intermarry with them, because they will surely turn your hearts after their gods.” Nevertheless, Solomon held fast to them in love. He had seven hundred wives of royal birth and three hundred concubines, and his wives led him astray. As Solomon grew old, his wives turned his heart after other gods, and his heart was not fully devoted to the Lord his God, as the heart of David his father had been. He followed Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, and Molek the detestable god of the Ammonites. So Solomon did evil in the eyes of the Lord; he did not follow the Lord completely, as David his father had done.

upload_2020-4-18_22-12-0.jpeg


Solomon
King of Israel
Description
Solomon, also called Jedidiah, was, according to the Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Quran, and Hadiths, a fabulously wealthy and wise king of the United Kingdom of Israel who succeeded his father, King David. Wikipedia

Born: Jerusalem, Israel
Died: 932 BC, Jerusalem, Israel
Spouse: Pharaoh's daughter, Naamah [700 wives + 300 second fiddles]
Parents: David, Bathsheba
Children: Rehoboam, Menelik I, Taphath, Basemath

Even God list polygamy as a sin against Solomon.
And Solomon lived before this so called prophet.
And the thing about Solomon is he is not a cradle snatcher.
He did not prey on children, like this so called prophet did.
Hitting on a 9 year old, when the kid hasn't finished her puberty age is quite devilish, I may say

upload_2020-4-18_22-28-5.jpeg


Nehemiah 13:26-27 New International Version (NIV)
Was it not because of marriages like these that Solomon king of Israel sinned? Among the many nations there was no king like him. He was loved by his God, and God made him king over all Israel, but even he was led into sin by foreign women. Must we hear now that you too are doing all this terrible wickedness and are being unfaithful to our God by marrying foreign women?”

Having so many wives and extra marital relationships were taboo even BEFORE CHRIST was born, as the bible attests to it.
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

*banned*
The stories in the Bible say Jesus rose from the grave. I have no real explanation for why those stories were written, but I do not believe them.

I explained why I believe that. I believe it because my religion teaches it. Don't you understand the passage I posted?

No, I am not the one who determines that. Only God knows since God is the one who inspired the Bible writers. I just have an opinion, as you do, but you do not know either.

You are not the first Christians who has told me that and you won't be the last. If you mean I do not believe everything in the Bible literally happened as it was written, no, I do not believe that. Here is an official statements from my religion on the Bible:

From letters written on behalf of the Universal House of Justice:

In studying the Bible Bahá'ís must bear two principles in mind. The first is that many passages in Sacred Scriptures are intended to be taken metaphorically, not literally, and some of the paradoxes and apparent contradictions which appear are intended to indicate this. The second is the fact that the text of the early Scriptures, such as the Bible, is not wholly authentic.
(28 May 1984 to an individual believer)

The Bahá'ís believe that God's Revelation is under His care and protection and that the essence, or essential elements, of what His Manifestations intended to convey has been recorded and preserved in Their Holy Books. However, as the sayings of the ancient Prophets were written down some time later, we cannot categorically state, as we do in the case of the Writings of Bahá'u'lláh, that the words and phrases attributed to Them are Their exact words
(9 August 1984 to an individual believer)

The Bible: Extracts on the Old and New Testaments

No, you didn't explain what I asked. I asked why do you believe the Cross but not the Resurrection? You say one is true but the other is a story, yet both are explained by the same writers. What makes one a story and the other true?

You can believe your religion and your book or books. But you can't have your view of the Bible and then say you believe the Bible. Because you don't.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Nimos

Well-Known Member
Sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you but I have been swamped since I am also posting on another forum now. I saved this post and your other one in a Word document so I would not forget, not that I would forget you, my favorite atheist. :D
Well you are my favorite Bahai, so that is good :D

The reason everyone does not get to heaven is because even though God does not make any demands on us, there are requirements; humans are the ones who decide if we get to heaven or not, and we do so by our own faith and conduct.
Who decided those requirements?

I fail to see a huge difference between God demanding something in particular from us compared to him setting requirements for getting into heaven. Can you give an example of where this is not ultimately the same?

That is true, we were all created in God’s image, but after we were created we had to choose between good and evil, because we have free will.
I think we talked about this as well a long time ago, so can only echo what I said back then. Saying that we have a choice is really not true or at least it is such an unfair choice that its outright stupid.

Its like me giving you a choice....

1. If you cross the bridge, you will be happy for eternity.
2. If you don't cross it, you will suffer for eternity.

Now make a choice?

Its plain stupid, if God exists, he would instantly be able to figure that out. But also able to figure out that humans would as well. How you can defend it by free will is a true mystery to me.

There is only one Messenger sent every 500-1000 years because only one is necessary to get the job done that God wants to get done. There could be another Messenger 1000 years from when Baha’u’llah declared His mission, but no sooner. That will depend upon what God deems necessary for humanity.
I don't get, how you can not question the validity of that? If you look at it from the outside, Lets say a human life in general is approximately 85 years on average. 500 to 1000 years? between God caring to communicate with us? Looking at the last 4000 years of religion and how little have happened, taking into account that God have communicated with us, you have pretty much all religious group harming each other and non believers as well, because the messages from God is so unclear that no one seem to be able to figure them out. And now we have to wait another what 800 years? Seriously? And by that time, another messenger might come, what if that person is a native indian, an Eskimo which live in a remote area and hardly anyone on Earth understand their language... the whole setup really doesn't make a lot of sense. It is so convenient the way it works, that one would assume that humans came up with it. :)

You are right that there cannot be more than one Messenger of God sent at a time, because it would be confusing if they contradicted each other, but also it is not necessary to have more than one at a time.
Exactly, but if they were directly instructed by God, there ought to be no confusion at all, it would be like having 10000s Baha'u'llahs all around the world, completely independent of each other saying the exact same things. And even then it would be near impossible to believe that they were actually messengers of God. But at least it would be a lot smarter move by God, if he wanted to communicate with us.

The only reason one could really argue why there would be so many contradictions, is because they would not be send from God, Therefore it is conveniently claimed that there can't be another messenger before another 1000 years have passed. Just think about, how amazingly lucky it is that God's capabilities are not able to handle more than one messenger at the time. While at the same time, the person chosen to be this messenger can't proof it. To me it almost sounds to good to be true. :)

Why would God do that? Why do we need more than one Messenger if that Messenger receives and relays to us everything God wants us to know at that time in history? God could do any of what you said but the reason he doesn’t do it is because He does not want to do it because we do not need the answers to those questions and we do not need miracles since we have been given a brain to figure things out and heal our own sick.
We need more messengers and proof of people claiming this, due to simple validity of what they claim. Throughout all of human history and even today, people have scammed each other into believing things that are not true.

And time after time, people never seem to learn to demand evidence for these claims, which is why people constantly gets caught up in these things.

Don't get me wrong, because most religious people are well aware of this and will just as any atheist, shake there head when they hear about some people getting caught up in some religious sect, which uses the exact same methods for manipulating people as religions does. But at no point does it seem to occur to them that they are doing the exact same thing, just under the name religion.

You convince people that something is true and that they can trust this due to faith.
You fill people with false hope, if they just commit to it. And when it then doesn't work, its not because of God, its because they failed or didn't pray enough.
You convince them that out of all the 10000s religions that have been on Earth throughout time, that they against incredible odds, happen to submit to the right one.
In the end, people no longer question what they believe, instead they spend so much time trying to fit things together that clearly doesn't, that it doesn't even occur to them to stop up and maybe question the whole concept to begin with.

So lets say that throughout history, there have been 100000 religions. You choose to be a Bahai, that basically mean that 99999 of all religions have been wrong. How incredible lucky is that :D

And then you ask a Christian and they funny enough reach the exact same conclusion and so does a muslim, JWs.

So based on the mere fact that this is clearly the case, the most obvious approach to any religion is that they are not true. And therefore it is crucial that they can provide evidence, that are far more comprehensive than simply a person claiming to be something. To me, that people are so poor at demanding and understanding evidence, must be the biggest miracle or mystery in human history so far. It makes so little sense to me.

And as I have also mentioned to you before, this seems to only apply to superstitious and religious belief. I have never seen or heard anyone reasoning in such manner, besides with these topics. To me its like people just switch off common sense and flow with whatever.

The first thing that you and many atheists do not understand is that just because God CAN do anything that does not mean God DOES do everything God CAN do. The second thing is that God only DOES what God chooses to do, and that will never be what humans want God to do unless that aligns with what God wants for humans.
Again as I said in the last reply, then screw God.

He didn't help us during WW1 or 2 or any other war, that have caused suffering to millions and millions of people, the spanish flu, The black death and other natural disasters, he doesn't help people that are sick or starve... so what exactly is he doing. Absolutely nothing, so God chooses to do nothing, besides sending us a messenger to spread confusion every 1000 year... so seriously why even bother with him? Why do you care about God in the first place?

You are right that is what happens with God’s Messengers but that is not God’s fault or the Messengers’ fault
Remember what I wrote just above? Ill quote it here again.

"You fill people with false hope, if they just commit to it. And when it then doesn't work, its not because of God, its because they failed or didn't pray enough."

This is exactly what all religious people does, there is always someone or something else to blame, never God, Jesus, Baha'u'llah etc. Always our fault, despite me just pointing out above, that God have done nothing to help us. If he cares about us and is all powerful, and chooses not to help, that makes him evil!!.

For example, we can see the message that Baha’u’llah delivered 150 years ago – the unity of mankind – coming to fruition right now, because of this pandemic. You see, whatever God wills always comes to pass, and since the Messengers represent God’s will, their will is always followed.
This is not going to fly Trailblazer :D

You are seeking and making up explanations that makes no sense and have absolutely no credibility. You do not need to be Baha'u'llah to be able to figure that out. I can tell you right here and right now, that we will have another one in the future, that we will have wars and terrible ones, and also we will have natural disasters, worse than what we have experience so far.

Will you give me credit as a messenger of God, when all these things come true? or is it absolutely obvious given the history of humans and Earth, that these things will happen at some point?

If you will not give me credit as a messenger of God or at least as being equal in predicable power to Baha'u'llah. Why then credit him for it, as if he did something special and not me?

Jesus had already completed His mission before he was crucified, and being crucified was part of His mission. Sure, nobody back then listened to Jesus just like not many people are now listening tom Baha’u’llah, but eventually the message of Jesus took hold and the same will happen with Baha’u’llah.
Just wondering, so lets assume that it will be around 800 years before the next one, do you imagine that God is just sitting there looking at us and thinking "That didn't go as planned. I thought Baha'u'llah would have done a lot better."

Again, it is not about capability, it is about what God chooses to do, and since God is All-Knowing and All-Wise God has to know the best strategy.
So lets get some things on the table then. So disregard the messengers, what would you say that God have done, that is not directly the result of humans intelligence? (Meaning any cures for disease etc, that have been discovered by humans etc.) How can we see the effect of God on Earth?

But this solution has worked for most people, and that is why most people are good people, not rapists and murderers.
It didn't work for the victims or their families either. Which were innocent, not to forget.

Of course if God exists, God cannot be incompetent. Why would you throw out all religious texts?
Because they make him incompetent, im sorry its not a lot different than what you are doing. Saying that he can't do this and that, because that not how he works, first of all how do you know? (Guess its from Baha'u'llah) Secondly, constantly claiming that God is all good and all powerful, and then adding one limitation after another on him, simply makes him incompetent. The way he choose to do things, like with the messengers. And again it doesn't just apply to Bahai, its to all of the religions, that I know of. Therefore I would throw out all religious texts, because they stink of human manipulation. :)
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
No, you didn't explain what I asked. I asked why do you believe the Cross but not the Resurrection? You say one is true but the other is a story, yet both are explained by the same writers. What makes one a story and the other true?
I explained why I believe in the Cross and not the Resurrection. It is not because of what the Bible says, it is because of what my religion teaches about the Cross and the Resurrection.

Here is what Baha'u'llah wrote about the Cross, which shows that Baha'is believe Jesus died on the Cross:

“Know thou that when the Son of Man yielded up His breath to God, the whole creation wept with a great weeping. By sacrificing Himself, however, a fresh capacity was infused into all created things...... Through Him, the unchaste and wayward were healed. Through His power, born of Almighty God, the eyes of the blind were opened, and the soul of the sinner sanctified.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 85-86


I do not believe that Jesus rose from the grave. The following is what Baha'is believe about the Resurrection.

“According to the Bahá’í teaching the Resurrection has nothing to do with the gross physical body. That body, once dead, is done with. It becomes decomposed and its atoms will never be recomposed into the same body.

Resurrection is the birth of the individual to spiritual life, through the gift of the Holy Spirit bestowed through the Manifestation of God. The grave from which he arises is the grave of ignorance and negligence of God. The sleep from which he awakens is the dormant spiritual condition in which many await the dawn of the Day of God. This dawn illumines all who have lived on the face of the earth, whether they are in the body or out of the body, but those who are spiritually blind cannot perceive it. The Day of Resurrection is not a day of twenty-four hours, but an era which has now begun and will last as long as the present world cycle continues. It will continue when all traces of the present civilization will have been wiped off the surface of the globe.”
Bahá’u’lláh and the New Era, p. 222

You can believe your religion and your book or books. But you can't have your view of the Bible and then say you believe the Bible. Because you don't.
Why can't I? There are Christians who share my view that the bodily resurrection never happened.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
The Bible does not "teach" the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The Bible contains stories that SAY that Jesus rose; bodily, but that is not a teaching, it is a story.
Why do you believe Jesus died on the Cross?
Trailblazer... I have the same problem with Baha's. You believe some of the stories but not all of the stories. The Bible opens with the story of creation and Adam and Eve, but you don't believe that story. Instead, Baha'is have their own story of Adam that came from where? From Islam maybe? But, the Baha'i story is true. Adam was a real person and a prophet/manifestation? What religion did he found? What Holy Book did he bring? What were the spiritual teachings of the prophet Adam?

The flood and the story of Noah are also changed by Baha'is. The story of Abraham his son are changed from Isaac to Ishmael. These sound like they were influenced by Islam also. What about Jonah and the big fish? God stopping the sun from moving for Joshua. Moses parting the waters? You might as well go through the whole Bible and tell us what parts are true and what parts are stories. But then, you'd be agreeing closer to what I believe. I think there is a very good chance it's all stories... or religious myth. Why can't Baha'is just come out and say something like that? Instead...

“Know thou that when the Son of Man yielded up His breath to God, the whole creation wept with a great weeping. By sacrificing Himself, however, a fresh capacity was infused into all created things...... Through Him, the unchaste and wayward were healed. Through His power, born of Almighty God, the eyes of the blind were opened, and the soul of the sinner sanctified.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 85-86
And the quote from Abdul Baha':
Therefore, we say that the meaning of Christ’s resurrection is as follows: the disciples were troubled and agitated after the martyrdom of Christ. The Reality of Christ, which signifies His teachings, His bounties, His perfections and His spiritual power, was hidden and concealed for two or three days after His martyrdom, and was not resplendent and manifest. No, rather it was lost, for the believers were few in number and were troubled and agitated. The Cause of Christ was like a lifeless body; and when after three days the disciples became assured and steadfast, and began to serve the Cause of Christ, and resolved to spread the divine teachings, putting His counsels into practice, and arising to serve Him, the Reality of Christ became resplendent and His bounty appeared; His religion found life; His teachings and His admonitions became evident and visible. In other words, the Cause of Christ was like a lifeless body until the life and the bounty of the Holy Spirit surrounded it.

The disciples in the gospels did not become steadfast and assured after three days. They did not arise to serve him. Some of them went to the tomb and found it empty. Then they claim they saw Jesus and spoke with him, and even touched him. He said he was not a ghost, that he had flesh and bone. Some Christians believe it literally. Some liberal Christians and most everyone else in the world questions it and thinks it is just a story. You say you believe the "teachings" and the "parables". Why? Why bother. The whole Bible, if it is just stories, is the biggest waste of time for any one to read. I can tell you right now the gist of it. Be nice. Don't lie. Don't be greedy or lustful.... or God suffer the wrath of anger.

Here is a quote from a book that will give you an example of how God's wrath works. "People were doing evil in the sight of the Lord, so he caused a great plague of Covind-19 to spread from village to village and from nation to nation. And a great voice was heard in the sky.... "Now will you guys listen and obey me? Or, do you want more of this? Oh yeah, 'Cause I can do it. I can cause a great warming of the seas and send plagues of hurricanes and tornadoes." The people were struck with fear, and for a whole week did everything as the Lord had commanded... then most went back to being jerks." quoted from the Book of more stuff made up by some guy and attributed to God. The virus was real. The global warming probably real. But, did God cause these things as a judgement against the people of the Earth? In the olden days they did. So "just" stories? Yes, I agree with you. The whole Bible is probably just stories. Stories to get people to obey rules and to get them to be nice. It promises blessings if they do and curses if they don't. In some places it threatens them with torture after they die or a great reward if they do good.

One of my big complaints about the Baha'i Faith is that, by what Baha'is say is true, I don't see how any of the previous religions were ever perfectly true... especially Christianity. They did teach heaven and hell. They did teach that Jesus rose from the dead. They did teach that people were born was a sin nature and needed Jesus' sacrifice to get right with God. If none of that is true then Christianity is mostly a big lie mixed in with a little bit of sayings on how to be a nice, spiritual person. Baha'is get into all these discussions, I call them arguments, because they try and have it both ways. They need to have their doctrine of "progressive" revelation be true. So all religions, somehow, have to be shown as being one. Since they are not. Baha'is have to show how the religions got off track. So here we are. The Christians are way off track. They believe the fool notion that a prophet of God could die, and then that God could bring him back to life. How foolish. Foolish yes, but that is what their Scriptures say and teach. Just stories? Give me a break. If it ain't true then call it what it is... a fabricated lie.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Trailblazer... I have the same problem with Baha's. You believe some of the stories but not all of the stories. The Bible opens with the story of creation and Adam and Eve, but you don't believe that story. Instead, Baha'is have their own story of Adam that came from where? From Islam maybe? But, the Baha'i story is true. Adam was a real person and a prophet/manifestation? What religion did he found? What Holy Book did he bring? What were the spiritual teachings of the prophet Adam?

The flood and the story of Noah are also changed by Baha'is. The story of Abraham his son are changed from Isaac to Ishmael. These sound like they were influenced by Islam also. What about Jonah and the big fish? God stopping the sun from moving for Joshua. Moses parting the waters? You might as well go through the whole Bible and tell us what parts are true and what parts are stories. But then, you'd be agreeing closer to what I believe. I think there is a very good chance it's all stories... or religious myth. Why can't Baha'is just come out and say something like that? Instead...
When you say that Bahais change things in the Bible, you are assuming that the stories that were recorded in the Bible are really true, and you are assuming that the Bible is inerrant and recorded accurately, and when you say that Baha'is do not accept the Christian interpretations you are assuming that Christians understood what the Bible means.

Baha'is believe what they do because it is in the Baha'i Writings and if that is contradicted by Christian beliefs we cannot believe what Christians believe. We believe that Baha'u'llah is the final authority and because of the Covenant we also believe what Abdu'l-Baha and Shoghi Effendi said or wrote.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Here is a quote from a book that will give you an example of how God's wrath works. "People were doing evil in the sight of the Lord, so he caused a great plague of Covind-19 to spread from village to village and from nation to nation. And a great voice was heard in the sky.... "Now will you guys listen and obey me? Or, do you want more of this? Oh yeah, 'Cause I can do it. I can cause a great warming of the seas and send plagues of hurricanes and tornadoes." The people were struck with fear, and for a whole week did everything as the Lord had commanded... then most went back to being jerks." quoted from the Book of more stuff made up by some guy and attributed to God. The virus was real. The global warming probably real. But, did God cause these things as a judgement against the people of the Earth? In the olden days they did. So "just" stories? Yes, I agree with you. The whole Bible is probably just stories. Stories to get people to obey rules and to get them to be nice. It promises blessings if they do and curses if they don't. In some places it threatens them with torture after they die or a great reward if they do good.
I do not want to confuse you, but God might have done 'some' of the things the Bible says He did and God might have caused this Covid-19. Some Baha'is believe that but most don't. ;)
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
One of my big complaints about the Baha'i Faith is that, by what Baha'is say is true, I don't see how any of the previous religions were ever perfectly true... especially Christianity. They did teach heaven and hell. They did teach that Jesus rose from the dead. They did teach that people were born was a sin nature and needed Jesus' sacrifice to get right with God. If none of that is true then Christianity is mostly a big lie mixed in with a little bit of sayings on how to be a nice, spiritual person. Baha'is get into all these discussions, I call them arguments, because they try and have it both ways. They need to have their doctrine of "progressive" revelation be true. So all religions, somehow, have to be shown as being one. Since they are not. Baha'is have to show how the religions got off track. So here we are. The Christians are way off track. They believe the fool notion that a prophet of God could die, and then that God could bring him back to life. How foolish. Foolish yes, but that is what their Scriptures say and teach. Just stories? Give me a break. If it ain't true then call it what it is... a fabricated lie.
From a Baha'i perspective it is easy to know what teachings from the previous religions are true and which are false. If they are similar to Baha'i teachings they are probably true but if they are contradictory, they are probably false. For example, if a religion teaches that their Prophet or religion is the 'final' Prophet or religion or the 'only way' to God, we cannot believe that is true because it contradicts progressive revelation.

The caveat is they if their teachings are different than Baha'i teachings they are not necessarily false because it makes sense that the teachings of the older religions would be different from each other and from the Baha'i Faith teachings. I mean why would God send new Messengers with the same exact teachings?
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
From a Baha'i perspective it is easy to know what teachings from the previous religions are true and which are false. If they are similar to Baha'i teachings they are probably true but if they are contradictory, they are probably false. For example, if a religion teaches that their Prophet or religion is the 'final' Prophet or religion or the 'only way' to God, we cannot believe that is true because it contradicts progressive revelation.

The caveat is they if their teachings are different than Baha'i teachings they are not necessarily false because it makes sense that the teachings of the older religions would be different from each other and from the Baha'i Faith teachings. I mean why would God send new Messengers with the same exact teachings?
I'm good with believing that most all of it are, like you say, "just" stories. Stories that tell of a people and their God. How their God created everything, then cursed the first humans for disobeying him. By the way have you read the Jewish Bible yet? It is their story. It is written as if those things really happened. If they didn't happen, then still they have a spiritual message. But, I'd call them religious myth at that point. Maybe based on some historical events. Maybe some events were fictional. But they had a message to them for the Jews. Part of that story, to me it's purely fictional, is the story of Abraham taking Isaac to be sacrificed. Baha'is believe it was Ishmael. In that case, are Baha'is supposed to believe it was an actual, historical event? If so, why? Why not just a story? Jews have their version and Islam and the Baha'is took it and changed the fictional story to fit their religion. Why? For what purpose? If the purpose is to show the connection between God and the Persians and Arabians through Ishmael, then Baha'is are saying this story is true. Really?

Thousands of years ago their was a man named Abraham that did all those things the Bible said? Then God really spoke to him and told him to stab his only son in the heart as a sacrifice to him? And Abraham listened to the voice? Then, who told the story? And after the oral tradition went about, who first wrote it down? Then, who changed the "original" version that had Ishmael in it and changed it to Isaac? If you haven't, read all of Genesis and tell me if you think these things really happened. Or, the Israelites had their mythology about their God and how they came to be a people. Talking serpents, a great flood, the tower of Babel, then later Moses parting the sea, the plagues God sent against Egypt, walls falling down at Jericho. Sodom and Gomorrah being destroyed by fire and brimstone and Lot's wife turning into a pillar of salt, a talking donkey, Samson getting his strength because of his hair... great mythical stories.

But, is Jesus, and the things he did, myth? Are they just stories? It is crazy to think he walked on water, turned water into wine, healed lepers and blind people and brought a couple of people back to life, that God spoke from heaven and that dead people came out of their graves and wandered around Jerusalem. So it's more than just the resurrection. Most of the gospels are filled with stories that for us could not have really happened. I include the virgin birth and the wandering star, why Baha'is believe the virgin birth I don't know. What's the point if you reject the rest as just stories?

The gospels present it like it really happened, and supposedly the disciples say they witnessed all those things. They taught those things as if they were true. They came up with the story that people needed the sacrifice of Jesus to pay the penalty for sin. To me, if it isn't true, that makes them and the writers all liars. And I'm okay with that. They embellished the story and created a new religion. And I use the example of the Mormons to show how even in modern times a story that sounds like fiction to most of us, is believed by the Mormons to be true. And the religion works for them. Just like your Baha'i story works for you. And I'd agree, in most ways it makes way more sense than the beliefs of other religions... except for one thing... progressive revelation.

Baha'is claim that the spiritual teachings stay the same, only the "social" teachings change. For me, they don't all have to be tied together. I'm fine with different people coming up with different Gods and different beliefs. It is obviously not the same message. But I don't even believe that some of those people that Baha'is say are "manifestations" really were. Actually, I think there is a good chance some of them were fictional. But Adam, Noah and Abraham and even Moses, I don't think fit the Baha'is definition of a "manifestation". And I don't think Jews think they were anything more than ordinary men.
 
Top