• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does Hinduism have scientific evidence proving that it's a true religion?

Satsangi

Active Member
We were talking about what qualifies as the Veda. Mathematics, Astrology, Science, etc., are Veda in the sense of Veda = Knowledge. But in the common usage of the word, they are not Veda. In other words, Indian mathematics is not from one of the four Vedas.


Where do you think they got the zero from? Incase you are implying they copied it from India, they did not use a base 10 or binary system as in ancient India. They used a base 20 system and I am not aware of any other culture around the world using base 20.

I was not even mentioning Maths, Astrology, Sciences etc... I meant the Ultimate meaning of the Veda Vakyas that can be known through an enlightened Guru. To give you an example- a rose looks red flower through the eyes, smells good through the nose, appeas thorny to touch and tastes "rosy" too. All this is knowledge about a rose through different Indiriyas. Similarly, when the Vedas are known through the intellect, their meaning is different than when they are realized in the Atman with the grace of an enlightened Guru- THAT IS THE REAL VEDAS.

I could care less if the Mayans invented zero first or learned it first from the ancient India- in the end ALL is a big zero anyway. May be they knew about "two" and learned about zero from India and then came up with 20- who knows?

Regards,
 

kaisersose

Active Member
I was not even mentioning Maths, Astrology, Sciences etc... I was metioning the Ultimate meaning of the Veda Vakyas through an enlightened Guru. To give you an example- a rose looks red flower through the eyes, smells good through the nose, appeas thorny to touch and tastes "rosy" too. All this is knowledge about a rose through different Indiriyas. Similarly, when the Vedas are known through the intellect, their meaning is different than when they are realized i
Regards,

Then we have no argument.

I could care less if the Mayans invented zero first or learned it first from the ancient India- in the end ALL is a big zero anyway. May be they knew about "two" and learned about zero from India and then came up with 20- who knows?

No argument here either, then.

I was clarifying the source of Zero as someone told ZenZero that the zero was mentioned in the Vedas. Someone else posted recently that DNA sequences were hidden in the Vedas.


Regards,
 

zenzero

Its only a Label
Friends,

Have mentioned this earlier that Science is the path going into what one sees through the eyes [external]. Where as religion is the path going where the eyes do not see [internal].
It is realised that what is inner has its manifestations in the outer and finding no need of the outer to reach to that *sunyata/purnata* [nothingness/everythingness] the necessity of either the vedas or origination of zero has been only matters of the mind [external] which is only for verification by meditators if so desired/required.

Though it appears that one's mind works on free choices in truth it follows the path of desires and karma; it is only few who questions the mind itself and quietens it and take that journey inwards and be one with existence in harmony. Where there are no *YOU* and *ME* as they are all the same in different forms which are as real as delusions.

[Delusions] reminds me of the movie *Beautiful Mind* as like Dr. John Nash everyone has to understand that they exists but not in reality.

LOve & rgds
 
Top