mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
I have a minute nitpick with the wording here.
There are plenty of objective definitions of "morality" and there are whole ethical philosophies for extrapolating from these definitions in purely rational ways. While no two people practice the same ethical philosophy identically and many people have their own idiosyncratic moral intuitions, that doesn't necessarily discount objective critique from a given ethical position.
The messy part is when one definition of morality claims to be the only true one or the only valid one. Such as when a utilitarian calls deontology immoral or the other way around. That's not necessarily a subjective definition; it is ultimately deduced from objective axioms analogous to how math and logic follow from their axioms.
I think maybe a better way of wording it is that it's a "personally preferred" definition. That preference is subjective, but the definition itself technically isn't.
Does that make sense or am I just coming across as a sophist?
I could nitpick objective, but that would be to much skepticism or sophism. I get your position now.