allfoak
Alchemist
I do not deny that it happens in the mind.Yeah. How could the vision of your mother appear (if not in your imagination)?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I do not deny that it happens in the mind.Yeah. How could the vision of your mother appear (if not in your imagination)?
It is a good thing i do not rely on such things.There are far too many problems for that to be considered a worthwhile experiment.
There is no random sampling (RS). Which is expect in a medical study, but nonetheless still a problem. Medical studies generally are not able to do RS, but that does not excuse them from it. Whenever you don't have RS you have to be more skeptical of your results. To clarify RS is what allows you to make general inferences to the larger population. It helps balance and account for confounding variables, which is something we can't do with humans in a controlled environment.
They can't really control the RS but they could have control random assignment (RA) of the VAs, but they didn't. That is clearly ignoring basic principles and what we call data snooping. Further more all the VAs should have been the same image, because they are different images you can not account for varying confounding variables that could be associated with different images.
With no random sampling & no random assignment the study becomes extremely limited. This really makes statistical inferences invalid. Any statistical inference or hypothesis done without RS and/or RA is closer to speculation than a statistical analysis.
Further more Greyson NDE scale is full of many leading questions which could skew results. On top of that human memory has been demonstrated to be very receptive to influence during such questioning and unreliable.
It is a good thing i do not rely on such things.
Is it possible to know what happens when we die?
If so, how do you know?
What does science have to say about it?
There are many different ideas in religion on the subject.
What are yours?
We all witness these things, but I think they are so disconnected from our everyday 'rational' life that we discard them as having no practical use, we talk ourselves into believing they were illusions- it's a far simpler, easier way to deal with them
I have not only thought it through but have also broken through.This is the crux of the issue, however. Even if these "things" are real - are the supernatural reaching out - what "practical use" does it have? The clocks all stopping at once... what purpose did it serve? To make for a good story? Is the ultimate practicality of investigations into these things an attempt to communicate with those who have passed? And at that point are we not tampering with something that has been ordained by fate to be a certain way for eons passed? Much like one might argue that we should not tamper with genetics. How would this be any different? Proof of the afterlife? Again - what practical purpose does this knowledge serve? Comfort? For some I'd wager it would pose danger. Killing yourself would no longer come with an unknown component - people might start offing themselves in droves to get to "the next level". Don't get me wrong - I do not believe in the supernatural., and so I certainly do not see the point in pursuing it. But I wonder at those who do - because I don't believe they have thought it through to a full extent.
And what practical use does this serve? A "catalyst"? Of what? Understanding? Understanding what? Can you apply the knowledge to your daily life? If so, what do you feel you have gained?I have not only thought it through but have also broken through.
There would be no investigation into understanding these things for most, apart from having these experiences.
They serve as a catalyst.
Is it possible to know what happens when we die?
If so, how do you know?
What does science have to say about it?
There are many different ideas in religion on the subject.
What are yours?
Contents
[1The afterlife in different metaphysical models
Is it possible to know what happens when we die?
If so, how do you know?
What does science have to say about it?
There are many different ideas in religion on the subject.
What are yours?
Contents
[1The afterlife in different metaphysical models
Satan lied to Eve when he told her; "You certainly will not die." (Genesis 3:4) I believe Satan and other wicked spirits who sinned against God are responsible for these paranormal events. At times, these demons pretend to be dead loved ones, to perpetuate Satan's false claim that we do not really die. I believe that is why Jehovah strongly condemns "anyone who inquires of the dead." (Deuteronomy 18:11)Do you have an explanation for paranormal activities?
Out of body experiences?
My mother came to my front door soon after she died.
Some say i am crazy.
Others accept it as if it is normal.
A literal view of the scripture is not sustainable.Satan lied to Eve when he told her; "You certainly will not die." (Genesis 3:4) I believe Satan and other wicked spirits who sinned against God are responsible for these paranormal events. At times, these demons pretend to be dead loved ones, to perpetuate Satan's false claim that we do not really die. I believe that is why Jehovah strongly condemns "anyone who inquires of the dead." (Deuteronomy 18:11)
Science has a lot to say about what happens when we die-how we think, what our bodies go through, and so forth. Science says nothing about life after death.
Saying that science has no evidence of life after death is accurate.That's because there is no evidence that there is life after death. It's just made up nonsense.
Saying that science has no evidence of life after death is accurate.
Saying it is made up nonsense is not.