McBell
Unbound
This actually hurts your argument.And disease is mostly caused by bacteria trying to survive. Why should God give us special consideration over them?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This actually hurts your argument.And disease is mostly caused by bacteria trying to survive. Why should God give us special consideration over them?
Why would an all-loving, all-powerful god put us in a world where we need to inflict suffering on others in order to survive?
This actually hurts your argument.
The difference is though, Lava, that Water is just an element. However medical science is Human knowledge of practises, not only that but the people who heal you are the actual Humans performing the operations, but only using medical science.
In that sense I think it's safe to assume that God doesn't intend for Humans to heal others, because the Human doing the healing (and the Humans who contributed to the knowledge of medical science) arn't mere "puppets" that obey God and perform medical ops - instead, they're Humans with their own free will.
lava said:you are talking about knowledge. during the simpliest operation there might be complications and person might die unexpectedly. even though knowledge was sufficient enough to save 'the body'...even if knowledge was completed, sometimes is not enough to heal.
Well in that case, wouldn't saying that actually damage your argument, because you believe in an omni-max all-loving God? Who, despite having the knowledge be correct, and the Doctor's skills be correct, and the operation be correct, still thought it was neccessary to perform an anti-miracle and kill off the patient, completely to everybodies suprise, and had the patient had lived, no one would've been the least bit suspicious - like (OMG how on Earth did he survive???!!) etc?
It seems an odd coincidence that God would suddenly decide to give permission to alleviate the suffering associated with polio right when humanity came up with a treatment.IMO medical science could only be proxy. just a tool, not the actual reason why you get healed. because medical science could not save or heal you without permission of God.
It seems an odd coincidence that God would suddenly decide to give permission to alleviate the suffering associated with polio right when humanity came up with a treatment.
And smallpox.
And the plague.
And bacterial infections.
And diabetes.
Strange that He would keep these in his repertoire of suffering (which is a good thing when it's inflicted by God, right?) for millions of years, and then just give up on them all of a sudden.
You guys are just dancing around the issue.
What is suffering? Like you don't know? You think that sloppy deliberately obtuse question warrants an answer?
The Inconsistent Tirade has bothered theist since they invented the 1st loving god. It has never been solved for the good and sufficient reason it can't be. The very best you mythologists can come with is that a all-knowing god just "knows better" and whatever suffering and needless pain and loss we experience is REALLY good for us. We just are too dumb to know it.:cover:
And if you are persuaded by that argument look me up. I've some ocean front property in Florida. Real cheap.
i think he is out of popcorns.
.
Riverwolf said:I know what suffering is. I'm just making sure we're in agreement, because suffering as I define it can be conquered by anybody.
In my total honest opinion, I do not believe in anything omni-max, even an omni-max God. I veiw omni-max as impossible, because it's own attributes would contradict itself (all-mercifull, all-just etc), a triangle, yet a square at the same time.
I'm just here to debate with Monotheists and othe religious people for the Hell of it
No pun intended