Many-worlds interpretation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Interpreting wavefunction collapse
As with the other interpretations of quantum mechanics, the many-worlds interpretation is motivated by behavior that can be illustrated by the
double-slit experiment. When
particles of light (or anything else) are passed through the double slit, a calculation assuming wave-like behavior of light can be used to identify where the particles are likely to be observed. Yet when the particles are observed in this experiment, they appear as particles (i.e., at definite places) and not as non-localized waves.
Some versions of the
Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed a process of "
collapse" in which an indeterminate quantum system would probabilistically collapse down onto, or select, just one determinate outcome to "explain" this phenomenon of observation. Wavefunction collapse was widely regarded as artificial and
ad hoc[
citation needed], so an alternative interpretation in which the behavior of measurement could be understood from more fundamental physical principles was considered desirable.
Everett's Ph.D. work provided such an alternative interpretation. Everett stated that for a composite system for example a subject (the "observer" or measuring apparatus) observing an object (the "observed" system, such as a particle) the statement that either the observer or the observed has a well-defined state is meaningless; in modern parlance, the observer and the observed have become
entangled; we can only specify the state of one
relative to the other, i.e., the state of the observer and the observed are correlated
after the observation is made. This led Everett to derive from the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone (i.e., without assuming wavefunction collapse) the notion of a
relativity of states.
Everett noticed that the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone decreed that after an observation is made each element of the
quantum superposition of the combined subjectobject wavefunction contains two "relative states": a "collapsed" object state and an associated observer who has observed the same collapsed outcome; what the observer sees and the state of the object have become correlated by the act of measurement or observation. The subsequent evolution of each pair of relative subjectobject states proceeds with complete indifference as to the presence or absence of the other elements,
as if wavefunction collapse has occurred, which has the consequence that later observations are always consistent with the earlier observations. Thus the
appearance of the object's wavefunction's collapse has emerged from the unitary, deterministic theory itself. (This answered Einstein's early criticism of quantum theory, that the theory should define what is observed, not for the observables to define the theory).
[23] Since the wavefunction appears to have collapsed then, Everett reasoned, there was no need to actually assume that it had collapsed. And so, invoking
Occam's razor, he removed the postulate of wavefunction collapse from the theory.
