No, reining in is not what is needed. More training. Why the anti-police attitude? If you were treated unjustly in the past that was probably due to police being underpaid (you do not get the best recruits that way) and undertrained.
I don't like seeing these kinds of stories. They lead to mistrust between the police and the public, along with a great deal of public disorder, such as we're seeing now and which we saw all last summer. I never said that I was ever personally treated unjustly by the police, but I've known people who have, as well as hear plenty of cases in the news.
Every time these things happen, the common solution is more training, but how much training do they require? What is the quality of that training? This was not a rookie. She was a 26-year veteran of the department. Likewise, Chauvin was not a rookie, and the prosecutor in the case called several expert witnesses who said that his hold was not part of police training.
What about the internal culture of police departments? I recall a recent article where some posts from message boards frequented by law enforcement officers had some rather choice comments, some were derogatory and racist.
This has been an ongoing issue for a long time now, but it seems the major flashpoints always come up whenever there's a police shooting or killing of a person of color. This is why BLM exists, and it's also why we've seen NFL players kneeling during the National Anthem. If the apparent proximate cause of the problem is the police, then I don't see how addressing that problem and proposing a solution would amount to an "anti-police attitude." At least I'm not advocating for defunding the police, as some people are. All I'm advocating is defanging the police.
Last edited: