Dr Adnan Ibrahim on Emotional Atheism

[Godobeyer]

That is hardly a reasonable comparison.

Not it's reasonable comparison.

because odds are exist in everything .

 

[LuisDantas]

Not it's reasonable comparison.

because odds are exist in everything .

Personal inclinations are entirely diverse from speculations about how things happen, and even more different from actual researched, falsifiable scientific findings.

 

[Godobeyer]

Why, it is because I am a dum****.

lol
Hell no, It's not an insult.
I find you English is complex , some others too.
It's not your fault it's mine

 

[Godobeyer]

Personal inclinations are entirely diverse from speculations about how things happen, and even more different from actual researched, falsifiable scientific findings.

odd is odd , whatever the field.

 

[LuisDantas]

lol
Hell no, It's not an insult.
I find you English is complex , some others too.
It's not your fault it's mine

I know you did not mean anything. I am much too fond of certain flourishes. That often comes back to bite me.

Too bad I find that so appealling anyway...

 

[LuisDantas]

odd is odd , whatever the field.

No, Godobeyer. Science has a method. For it to be science at all it has to rise above the boundaries of aesthetical acceptability.

 

[Godobeyer]

No, Godobeyer. Science has a method. For it to be science at all it has to rise above the boundaries of aesthetical acceptability.

I am talking about personal opinion when become against commun opinion. (being rare)

I find it odd that someone atheist believe in God , or theist believe in evolution without creation or someone want to marry dog , or PC ...etc

 

[YmirGF]

No, Godobeyer. Science has a method. For it to be science at all it has to rise above the boundaries of aesthetical acceptability.

That's the truly weird part of all this, Luis. Science is almost a universal language that is shared by all races, ethnicity, religions and political persuasions. Normally its one of the few areas people can agree on because they can check ideas and claims out for themselves.

 

[YmirGF]

I am talking about personal opinion when become against commun opinion. (being rare)

I find it odd that someone atheist believe in God , or theist believe in evolution without creation or someone want to marry dog , or PC ...etc

It would be odd if an atheist believed in god. I'd say the person is either not too bright or terribly conflicted.

 

[LuisDantas]

I am talking about personal opinion when become against commun opinion. (being rare)

Sure. But science is not a matter of opinion. If it were, it would not be science.

I find it odd that someone atheist believe in God

So do I. When or where did that happen? It is at least superficially a direct contradiction.

, or theist believe in evolution without creation or someone want to marry dog , or PC ...etc

There is nothing in evolution that can't happen with a God. It just does not hint towards any.

 

[Godobeyer]

That's the truly weird part of all this, Luis. Science is almost a universal language that is shared by all races, ethnicity, religions and political persuasions. Normally its one of the few areas people can agree on because they can check ideas and claims out for themselves.

Science is updated , especially about theories .
theory of Darwin was talen as good theory in the past "for some people" espcially atheists, now it's not .

 

[LuisDantas]

Science is updated , especially about theories .

Correct - but not nearly as consequential as you make it seem here.

theory of Darwin was talen as good theory in the past

Correct, but incomplete. As it turns out, it has only become better demonstrated and more complete since. It is for all practical purposes an established fact now. Has been around a century now.

"for some people"

Wrong. All informed people, instead.

espcially atheists,

Wrong.

now it's not .

Wrong.

 

[YmirGF]

Science is updated , especially about theories .
theory of Darwin was talen as good theory in the past "for some people" espcially atheists, now it's not .

That is ridiculous, Godobeyer. Reality does not agree with your opinion no matter how much you wish it did.

 

[Godobeyer]

That is ridiculous, Godobeyer. Reality does not agree with your opinion no matter how much you wish it did.

Your reality .

 

[LuisDantas]

Demonstrable reality, Godobeyer.

 

[Godobeyer]

Correct - but not nearly as consequential as you make it seem here.

Correct, but incomplete. As it turns out, it has only become better demonstrated and more complete since. It is for all practical purposes an established fact now. Has been around a century now.

.

Do you mean , Darwin theory is update by scientists ?

I meant first one (original one).

 

[LuisDantas]

Do you mean , Darwin theory is update by scientists ?

I meant first one (original one).

You are not aware of how theories work, I assume?

Darwin was no prophet.

 

[YmirGF]

Your reality .

You know, this reminds of a conversation I was having with two people in real life. I listened to them blather on and on about a subject they didn't really know much about. I then took a few minutes to explain the errors in their thinking. I summed it all up with, "Don't believe me. Look it up. Find out what I'm saying is true!" They both simultaneously roared that that was JUST my opinion. I sat blinking for a sec and reiterated, appealing to their reason that they could simply research the topic and prove me wrong. (I knew with a high level of certainty that the chances of that were slim to nil.) Neither gave an inch and triumphantly felt they had won some contest of wits. It was truly breathtaking. Idiocy in numbers does not a reality make.

 

[Godobeyer]

Demonstrable reality, Godobeyer.

No, you claim know the reality but you don't .

origine of life is theory not fact , and "natural selection" and "randomness" are just names to justify your ignorance and failure.

 

[Godobeyer]

You know, this reminds of a conversation I was having with two people in real life. I listened to them blather on and on about a subject they didn't really know much about. I then took a few minutes to explain the errors in their thinking. I summed it all up with, "Don't believe me. Look it up. Find out what I'm saying is true!" They both simultaneously roared that that was JUST my opinion. I sat blinking for a sec and reiterated, appealing to their reason that they could simply research the topic and prove me wrong. (I knew with a high level of certainty that the chances of that were slim to nil.) Neither gave an inch and triumphantly felt they had won some contest of wits. It was truly breathtaking. Idiocy in numbers does not a reality make.

Whatever.
My truth is different than yours.