excuse me ?There is not enough there to even discuss, sorry.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
excuse me ?There is not enough there to even discuss, sorry.
Yes , I know you opinion, that which is totaly wrong .Things are as they are. The video is beyond weak. It is not, as they say, even wrong.
I could say the same thing to theists who find atheism unconvincing, but that's not an argument by itself. I'd also need to explain why I think going back billions of years ago was evidence for anything, be it atheism or theism.
There are no points, just prejudice and supertition. It is,sadly, not worth my time.Yes , I know you opinion, that which is totaly wrong .
especially when you just talks without discuss the points .
Really !!There are no points, just prejudice and supertition. It is,sadly, not worth my time.
There are a lot more than you seem to think.They are extremely rare, on this forum and in reality.
However, I was interested in something you said, which I highlighted. If one understands their religion and I mean truly understands and decides to reject it, with that rejection being based on some sound logic and investigation, then I would call them a respectable person, a seeker of truth who has just started his or her journey.
Right at the start he says that the "world" or "universe" of the cell has been "proven" to be "clever".Really !!
I see no prejudice or supertition in his speech !!!
for exemple ?
Right at the start he says that the "world" or "universe" of the cell has been "proven" to be "clever".
Doesn't it now?Sounds like something Deepak Chopra would say.
I believe it's Arabic language skills (differents),Right at the start he says that the "world" or "universe" of the cell has been "proven" to be "clever".
That does not actually make any sense. It fails to be even wrong. He should have stopped right there and reconstructed his phrase if he aimed to say something coherent.
Then what makes you convinced about atheism?
Same feeling about atheism lol , it's does not make any sense to me , Dr Adnan called "mind suicide" , I do agree with him.I see no evidence that any god or gods exist, so atheism makes sense to me. Someone's being an atheist doesn't mean that he/she doesn't understand religion or that he/she is being "emotional."
Since some of us can't see the video (I'm on cell data ATM and I'm not going to waste it with your video), what if we start by you telling us the points made in the video that you consider the most compelling or important?So let's discuss the mistakes that he did.
That basically means neither of you has a functional understanding of atheism. Nothing more than that.Same feeling about atheism lol , it's does not make any sense to me , Dr Adnan called "mind suicide" , I do agree with him.
No , I can't imagine that someone believe that he created by natural selective , I feel it's like insane.That basically means neither of you has a functional understanding of atheism. Nothing more than that.
So you associate acceptance of natural selection with atheism? They are actually very separate, almost completely independent even.No , I can't imagine that someone believe that he created by natural selective , I feel it's like insane.
I think you need to realize something: what you're asking is unfair.Really !!
I see no prejudice or supertition in his speech !!!
for exemple ?
That's just one of course . I remember you always associate atheism to natural selectionSo you associate acceptance of natural selection with atheism? They are actually very separate, almost completely independent even.
In any case, you are doing neither justice, sorry to say.