• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Energy, matter, time and existence

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Truth.

Theist has the total human self life nature existing out of his thesis. Not in thesis point position beginning what he wants for machines.

He isn't there. So lying as the human who exists exactly won't give you science...no life there answers.

Then you have men with machines interacting new life in attack data feedback by machines. All just machine conditions. Not any humans position at all. Lying.

Pulse studying human life behaviour he says by data.... makes wiggly comments about a humans own experience. In their study. Then says it's because earths heavens cosmic back drop is wiggly. Lying.

I'm wiggly naturally as a human....scientists are liars.

Comparing falsely is his rich man's life warning's. Past and present same behaviour. No human in thesis means exactly no human.

Satan we said was our human brother. He imposes his machines laws to conditions never ever even a law.

O earth a mass cooling isn't a law it was natural.

It cooled in space naturally... it burst volcanic gas release smoking rolling.

Vacuum void not a law changed those gases. Released position not the same today. A volcano inside a heavens.

Men say rock became rock a seal in space ended as heated radiating position now cold. No further status. No backdrop.

A volcano isn't a law. Isn't something you follow.

Cold clear gas in space is because extra space owns created gases.

As a lying man scientists satanist claim today says so mass can own extra space conditions. Which is the gas only.

As mass doesn't own the extra space gas does allowing it to not be mass.

Gas is that space condition.

Sun blastings wasn't any law either. It was a cause. Then an effect.

Long ago men were Satanists. Learnt by their own brain mind burning prickling lesson caused fallout themselves. In Rome. Rome had burnt. Then kept receiving fallout.

Decided to found a healing centre the church. Said science was forbidden. Legally over ruled it. A long time after Jesus...as they learnt.

Began whipping his body to remind himself just how evil human scientists are. Criminal self destructive just human personalities. Who knew humans life destruction.

By ground and atmospheric terms.

Whipped himself so he would never forget. As he knew it's easy to forget.

Increased changes and returned brain mind attack.1000 years later. No law Jesus terms... as no four day earth rendering occurred. The day didn't go dark either....sink holes hadn't opened.

Not really Jesus just a reminder biology man's life was hurt again after healing evolution of no machines involved.

A teaching only.

Without mass by science or machine life. Life was sacrificed attacked once again.

Notification to all scientists you don't control creation. The human lesson. Documented to be a human warning and lesson. Science never owned it's causes. Natural history had....effects.

Ignored.

Church was founded to stop nuclear progression and has failed. Too late you chose life's destruction is the mans answer.

Which you all lie about. As you began lying you end lying. By human science.

As natural conditions never conjured devil Satan themes. Law was freeze fused. You broke it. Science by human men only had caused it.

Why we said our science brother was the title Satan's theist.

You knew your owned human man memory was a living human spiritual man. A human father. You lied and said he was a God.

Men looking for energy who in science only get it by converting earths mass where his machine came from.

We live inside a gas mass supporting water mass and it's oxygenation that isn't energy. Man in science says not until you make a gas burn. Then a human says I now use gas as energy. Burning.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
The warning of humans to humans about just human theists.

Who use human questions only and give human answers only about any subject they think about.

Not owning any history of the subject.

Earth a planet.

Why it's rock as first in natural law. A planet formed in space nothing.

Sucking space empty void. Like a womb sucks contracts then pushes back upon the mass. Only thought upon position no heavens.

Not relative whatsoever anywhere else. Being put back as rock mass.

However was once one subject thought upon.

So energy was both cooled and pushed back in by spatial heating cooling until Rock formed.

God O earth entity rock law first.

Then its first position was changed. It caused a volcanic release.

Law about rock existing must be ignored says human theist. Changed.

Then the subject about earths dust.

A totally different topic.

When earth owned rock heavens cold clear the sun big bang blasted earth mass.

Made sink holes.

Whilst the tunnel holes formed volcanic mass released into the tunnels.

Some tunnels sealed. Other tunnels combusted volcanic mass also. Remained empty. Earth given collapse status. Weakened inner mass.

The position when earth converted into owning dusts.

Not even related to any human theory about how just rock existed in empty space.

Cave in. Another topic...beneath plate eating and consuming was by sun time. Used by theists as science to earth mass himself.

Carpenter tectonic.

Why a rock planet mass shrunk it's mass. It caved in built up mass by volcanic release.

As a hard core metal plus volcanic mass still existed within. Earth still existed. Other planets blew into star mass fixed.

Plates above hence cave in. Planet becomes smaller mass.

Why smaller mass planets exist in the exact same space nothing position. As all other planets did. As planets move it's why the sun attacked each planet differently.

As known by visionary men human theists. Who gave all questions just humans answers. So always knew the truth.

Therefore he has no excuse to argue now. As some men lie only for human greed and not fact.

Told by his own ancient man's science caused attack on planet earth himself.

Why he knew.

So then the man archaeologist Proved him correct. Yes deep earth digs prove human scientists knew about it. As they had in fact caused it. By evidence.

Fully advised why.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
Maybe you are simply describing the 'organization' of the physical laws. Initially, it seems that things *were* chaotic; high temperatures, high pressures, very little variation. As things cooled, the natural laws allowed for the formation of nuclei, atoms, stars, and galaxies.
That couldn't have happened without the chaos being limited in some way, by some restricting force.

So, yes, things have properties. Those properties are, ultimately, what natural laws describe.[/QUOTE]There are no properties in abject chaos. There is only chaos. There are not rules or laws in abject chaos. There is only chaos. But the universe is not abject chaos. Far from it. It;s an extremely complex organization of forces. And that could not have happen in abject chaos. Because nothing can happen in abject chaos but abject chaos. Hence, some limiting force was present BEFORE time = 0.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
That couldn't have happened without the chaos being limited in some way, by some restricting force.

So, yes, things have properties. Those properties are, ultimately, what natural laws describe.
There are no properties in abject chaos. There is only chaos. There are not rules or laws in abject chaos. There is only chaos. But the universe is not abject chaos. Far from it. It;s an extremely complex organization of forces. And that could not have happen in abject chaos. Because nothing can happen in abject chaos but abject chaos. Hence, some limiting force was present BEFORE time = 0.[/QUOTE]
No, it just shows that whenever matter and energy existed, they had properties. That does not imply any force 'before', only that properties always existed when those things existed.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
No, it just shows that whenever matter and energy existed, they had properties. That does not imply any force 'before', only that properties always existed when those things existed.
There is no evidence that anything existed "before" time = 0 but possibility and limitation.
 
Top