They in my case, drove me into madness.
I at least understand this.
Lots of "gods" one can find. At some point it can drive you mad.
That's why I had to let go of all gods to regain my sanity.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They in my case, drove me into madness.
Love enlightens. Without love, people tend to ignore those they hate, or only show negative reactions. Haters don't believe anything good can come from those they despise.
There is none of us so good that we aren't capable of evil. And none of us so evil that we don't have the potential for good. - Edgar Cayce
I at least understand this.
Lots of "gods" one can find. At some point it can drive you mad.
That's why I had to let go of all gods to regain my sanity.
Without love or hate, there is no reason to ignore.
You seem to imply love is needed to counter hate.
How about not playing with either?
A life where you dismiss the value love? Is that what you mean?
A life where you dismiss nothing.
Hate, love, greed, charity etc...
Lots of emotions/feelings avail themselves.
Nothing wrong with any of them as long as you don't get attached.
I think detachment from emotions is healthy (suppressing them isn’t). But I think love is more than an emotion - love is the most powerful energy in the universe, it is the source of creation, the alpha and the omega.
In my opinion, as a certain poster often says.
Ok, fair enough.
I can't say my view is the correct one. I see love as a biochemical reaction in the brain.
Has anyone felt God's presence?
I have, and I would describe it as enlightening.
Was it actually God? IDK, but the experience seemed to fit he bill of what I thought God's presence ought to feel like.
So we feel this presence and through it, justify our belief in God.
Through this personal experience.
Do you justify your belief through such an experience or do you have other means of justifying your belief in God?
Personal experiences and feelings are never trustworthy - the mind is extremely powerful, often beyond our imagination. One must have an external or impartial gauge in order to determine the reality and significance of their alleged epiphany.Has anyone felt God's presence?
I have, and I would describe it as enlightening.
Was it actually God? IDK, but the experience seemed to fit he bill of what I thought God's presence ought to feel like.
So we feel this presence and through it, justify our belief in God.
Through this personal experience.
Do you justify your belief through such an experience or do you have other means of justifying your belief in God?
Has anyone felt God's presence?
I have, and I would describe it as enlightening.
Was it actually God? IDK, but the experience seemed to fit he bill of what I thought God's presence ought to feel like.
So we feel this presence and through it, justify our belief in God.
Through this personal experience.
Do you justify your belief through such an experience or do you have other means of justifying your belief in God?
Surely this is the issue - since you might be primed to interpret any such experience as being 'God's presence'. How could one determine this is the case from any number of other quite similar experiences or combinations of such to have produced this?
I'll stick with mind processes of an unknown variety - until we have better explanations for all such.When Adam and Eve were kicked out of Eden, God put Satan in charge of Earth. If someone senses a powerful entity, how do they know that they are not sensing Satan?
It is also the sensation of goodness that accompanies the sensation of great power. That is one way to tell if one is in contact with God or Satan. Another way to tell is to analyze the message. God wants you to do things that will help Him and yourself. Save the environment, help the poor, etc. Don't make wars, especially in haste before you determine if your enemy is guilty.
Very useful informationWithout love, people tend to ignore those they hate, or only show negative reactions
apathy or responding hatefully to someone isn't lovingVery useful information
So, if people react negative to me, it means they "lack love"
And if I would reply reacting negative it means I "lack love"
I wasn't talking about "apathy"apathy or responding hatefully to someone isn't loving
I wasn't talking about "apathy"
I do not despise peopleso you took part of the subject matter vs the context; which included despising someone.
having been wronged and being angry about it, isn't a problem. hopefully the offending person would choose to correct the problem and mete justice but that isn't always the case.
despising someone for an instance of wrong, whether corrected, or not, and ignoring they have the potential to do good, and probably are doing some good, is painting a person into a black vs white scenario. it's a spectrum and not a polarization only.